//
© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2016] WASCA 123
Court of Appeal (WA)
2016-07-13
Mr P, Lure P, Mazza JA, Mitchell J, Jenkins J
Original judgment source is linked above.
56 MITCHELL J: I agree with the orders proposed by Mazza JA for the reasons given by McLure P and Mazza JA.
Al Jrood v The State of Western Australia [2016] WASCA 73
Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520
Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (2005) 228 CLR 357
Markovic v The Queen [2010] VSCA 105; (2010) 30 VR 589
Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39; (2011) 244 CLR 120
Nguyen v The Queen [2001] WASCA 72; (2001) 118 A Crim R 519
R v Lee [2013] WASCA 216
R v Ng [2012] WASCA 180
R v Zerafa [2013] NSWCCA 222; (2013) 235 A Crim R 265
Rimington v The State of Western Australia [2015] WASCA 102
Ryan v The Queen [2001] HCA 21; (2001) 206 CLR 267
The State of Western Australia v Baldini [2015] WASCA 39
The State of Western Australia v Chapman [2012] WASCA 203
Trompler v The State of Western Australia [2008] WASCA 265
Vagh v The State of Western Australia [2007] WASCA 17
Veen v The Queen [No 2] [1988] HCA 14; (1988) 164 CLR 465
Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584
15 A statement of agreed facts was read in open court by the prosecutor. Those facts were, in substance, repeated in her Honour's sentencing remarks: R v Kleindyk [2015] WASCSR 78. The facts of the offending were described by her Honour as follows:
(2010) 242 CLR 520
(2005) 228 CLR 357
(2010) 30 VR 589
(1990) 108 FLR 370
(2011) 244 CLR 120
(2001) 206 CLR 267
(1988) 164 CLR 465
(2001) 207 CLR 584