United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe
Recently analysed

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court

District of Columbia

© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.

King v Patrick Projects Pty Ltd [2015] FWCFB 2679 - FWCFB 2015 case summary — Zoe

Legislation Cases Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Home/Cases/[2015] FWCFB 2679

CTHFWCFB

King v Patrick Projects Pty Ltd [2015] FWCFB 2679

[2015] FWCFB 2679

Fair Work Commission (Full Bench)|2015-05-04

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Fair Work Commission (Full Bench)

Decision date

2015-05-04

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (6 paragraphs)

[1]

(#P24_488) King v Patrick Projects Pty Ltd [2015] FWC 1221.

[2]

(#P62_4523) Fair Work Act 2009, s.400(1).

[3]

(#P63_4606) [2010] FWAFB 5343 at [27].

[4]

(#P98_9650) [2013] FCA 291.

[5]

(#P107_11957) [2012] FWA 1789 at [8]

[6]

(#P116_12996) Asciano Services Pty Ltd v Zac Hadfield [2015] FWCFB 2618 at [19]; Oratis v Melbourne Business School [2014] FWC 2838; Decision upheld by the Full Bench in Oratis v Melbourne Business School [2014] FWCFB 3869.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

# King

Respondent/Defendant:

Patrick Projects Pty Ltd \[2015\] FWCFB 2679

Legislation Cited (1)

Work Act 2009