© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2025] FWC 543
defendant. The application under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) made by Mr Johnathan Black on 8 September 2024 is dismissed.
The Fair Work Commission dismissed Mr Black's unfair dismissal claim because he failed to attend two scheduled conciliation conferences and stopped responding to the Commission's attempts to contact him. The Commission has power under section 587 of the Fair Work Act to dismiss applications where the applicant is not actively pursuing their case. The Commission found that Mr Black's conduct showed he was no longer willing to participate, and it was appropriate to dismiss his application rather than continue with proceedings he was not pursuing.
AI-generated legal information, not legal advice. Zoe can make mistakes. Check the cited source, and for advice about your situation consult a qualified Australian lawyer.
1 cited instrument linked from this judgment.
s.394 - Unfair dismissal
Application for an unfair dismissal remedy - lack of prosecution - dismissal under s.587(3)(a) at the Commission's initiative.
1. The application under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) made by Mr Johnathan Black on 8 September 2024 is dismissed.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
Johnathan Black
Arden Architectural Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 543
The application under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) made by Mr Johnathan Black on 8 September 2024 is dismissed.