[2025] VCAT 468
General information, not legal advice.
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
2025-05-29
Original judgment source is linked above.
Use and development of a cafe, take away food premises with ancillary drive-through facility, playland, carpark and landscaping.
The fences shall be designed to provide an acoustic barrier between the site and adjacent residential properties. The acoustic fence shall be maintained in a good condition to the satisfaction of the City of Boroondara, the Responsible Authority
The landscaping shown on the endorsed plan shall be completed prior to the commencement of the use and the occupation of the development hereby permitted to the satisfaction of the City of Boroondara, the Responsible Authority.
The time within which the use, development, matter or thing is to be commenced or completed, may be extended upon application to the City of Boroondara, the Responsible Authority, provided that application is made before or within three months after the expiry of this permit.
If a nuisance by reason of smell occurs the operator of the Café hereby permitted shall upon written notification from the City of Boroondara, the Responsible Authority, investigate and provide additional devices to reduce the emissions of smell from the premises.
The removal of waste/garbage from the site shall be carried out between the hours of 8am and 7pm and be so conducted as to cause minimum interference with other vehicular traffic and noise nuisance to adjacent residential properties.
If in the opinion of the City of Boroondara, the Responsible Authority, noise levels generated through activity on the site are exceeding the levels set by the above described policies the use shall be regulated to the satisfaction of the City of Boroondara, the Responsible Authority, to ensure compliance and if necessary additional noise devices shall be installed in consultation with an acoustic engineer and to the satisfaction of the City of Boroondara, the Responsible Authority.
The site works plan shall be in accord with the proper specifications and requirements of the Technical Services Department of the City of Boroondara, Kew Distract Office to the satisfaction of the City of Boroondara, the Responsible Authority.
The works shown on the approved site works plan shall be constructed in accordance with the said plan prior to the commencement of use or the occupation of the development hereby permitted to the satisfaction of the City of Boroondara, the Responsible Authority.
Drainage works constructed pursuant to the permit shall at all times be maintained and repaired to the satisfaction of the City of Boroondara, the Responsible Authority.
The area set aside for the parking of vehicles together with the aisles and drives shall be properly formed to such levels that it can be utilised in accordance with the said plan and shall be drained and sealed with an all weather seal coat which shall be capable of being marked.
The boundaries of all car spaces shall be clearly marked in accordance with the details shown on the endorsed plan.
The 12 car park spaces adjacent to 2, 6 and 8 Pakington Street and all car parking spaces on the east side of the internal vehicular accessway shall be closed to patron use (but available for staff use) by a device physically preventing access to these spaces approved by the Responsible Authority in accordance with condition 25 between 1.00am and 6.00am the following day to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
No public access to this part of the site is permitted.
(a) Surveillance and security measures.
(b) Site management.
(c) Restaurant management.
(d) Complaints management, including recording of all incidents occurring on site via logbook or other appropriate method.
(e) Litter patrol and removal.
(f) Delivery services.
(g) Car parking hours signage, including the hours specified under this permit when the car park is closed to patrons.
(h) How the car park area to the west of the access driveway (adjacent to High Street) shall be closed to patron use by chain or other device between 10.00pm and 6.00am the following day.
(i) The means by which all on site car parking will be restricted to staff use only between 1:00am and 6:00am each day, including any physical barriers or the like, and management of the use of those spaces, and any other management methods for this purpose.
(j) The inspection of the existing acoustic fence at specified intervals to identify any gaps or damage, and undertake repairs within a reasonable period of time.
(k) How the external patron seating areas will be closed to patron use between 1:00am and 6:00am the following day.
A copy of the approved SMP must be provided to all managers, supervisors and the like once every six months, and at any time the SMP is varied, to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
The approved SMP must be implemented to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
(a) Consider impacts from fixed plant and equivalent average and maximum noise levels with respect to car park and drive-thru through activities between 1.00am and 6.00am.
(b) Include any recommended mitigation measures (where additional to the acoustic fence required by condition 2) to ensure that noise from fixed plant and car park and drive-thru activities between 1.00am and 6.00am comply with applicable noise limits and criteria (as advised by the acoustic consultant).
Any mitigation measures recommended to be undertaken in the acoustic report must be implemented before the commencement of the use as a 24-hour 7 day a week operation, to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
(a) Verify that the noise from fixed plant and car park and drive-thru activities between 1.00am and 6.00am results in compliance with noise limits and criteria as specified in the acoustic report endorsed pursuant to condition 26.
(b) If the testing identifies any non-compliances with noise limits and criteria specified in the acoustic report endorsed pursuant to condition 26, identify any further mitigation measures required to ensure conformance.
Any further mitigation measures identified in this report must be implemented as soon as reasonably practicable after finalisation of that report, to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
(a) Acoustic screening to the MAC-90 refrigeration unit
(b) The western and northern site acoustic fencing be sealed and repaired as necessary including certification that the fence addresses noise emissions in accordance with the Noise Protocol (Publication 1826, Noise Limit and Assessment Protocol for the Control of Noise from Commercial, Industrial and Trade Premises and Entertainment Venues).
[1] The submissions and evidence of the parties, any supporting exhibits given at the hearing and the statements of grounds filed have all been considered in the determination of the proceeding. In accordance with the practice of the Tribunal, not all of this material will be cited or referred to in these reasons.
[2] It is acknowledged that this 'criteria' is not a requirement in Victoria. Further discussion of this is set out further below.
[3] This amendment application was made pursuant to section 72 of the PE Act.
[4] Some of the descriptions in this section are taken from the council's written submissions.
[5] Source: the council's submissions, Attachment 4.
[6] This northern inaccessible part of the site is excluded when reference is made in these reasons to the northern and western boundaries.
[7] Source: Attachment 3 of the council's submissions.
[8] Source: document provided by the respondent to Ms Li during cross examination of Ms Li on day 2 of the hearing, 20 February 2025.
[9] Clause 02.01-4 'Economic Development'.
[11] Clause 02.03 'Strategic Directions'
[13] Who were also joint applicants for review, except Ms Giannakopoulos.
[14] Acoustics Expert Evidence by Mr Ross Leo of Clarity Acoustics Pty Ltd dated 4 February 2025, Tribunal Book pages 833 - 862.
[15] Acoustics Expert Evidence by Mr Nicholas Peters of Renzo Tonin & Associates Pty Ltd dated 5 February 2025, Tribunal Book pages 893 - 977.
[16] Intermittency is defined as more than 2 rapid variations in noise over the 30-minute period.
[17] Addendum to Statement of Mr Ross Leo.
[18] Paragraph 1.7 of Mr Peters' addendum evidence statement.
[19] Paragraph 6.2.1 of Mr Peters' evidence statement.
[20] Paragraph 2.5 of Mr Peters' evidence statement.
[21] Paragraph 5.2.4 of Mr Leo's evidence statement.
[22] Paragraph 57 of Mr Pagliaro's evidence statement.
[23] Swancom Pty Ltd v Yarra City Council VCAT 923 (10 June 2009).
[24] Paragraph 19 of Ms Brest's evidence statement.
Heselev
Boroondara C [2025] VCAT 468