Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

Health Services Union v Department of Human Services [2014] FWC 6722 | Case summary | Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[2014] FWC 6722

CTHFWC

Health Services Union v Department of Human Services [2014] FWC 6722

[2014] FWC 6722

Fair Work Commission|2014-09-26|Before: Commissioner Bissett

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Fair Work Commission

Decision date

2014-09-26

Before

Commissioner Bissett

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Plain-English guides

Unfair dismissal at the Fair Work Commission (Form F2)Australia (Commonwealth)
Recover unpaid wages through Fair Work Ombudsman and small claimsAustralia (Commonwealth)
Unfair deactivation for gig and employee-like workersAustralia (Commonwealth)

Judgment (7 paragraphs)

[1]

(#P104_7538) [2004] HCA 40; (2004) 221 CLR 309.

[2]

(#P105_7681) Explanatory Memorandum, paragraphs 661-666.

[3]

(#P170_13372) FSU v GIO Australia Pty Ltd PR9191615 at [33], Bain; ex parte Cadbury Schweppes Australia Ltd [1984] HCA 9; (1983) 159 CLR 163 per Murphy J at 168.

[4]

(#P203_17908) (2005) 142 IR 289.

[5]

(#P204_18268) Ibid, [7]-[27].

[6]

(#P269_27166) [1947] HCA 26; (1947) 74 CLR 31.

[7]

(#P290_29450) Toyota Motor Corporation v Mamara & Ors [2014] FCAFC 84.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Health Services Union

Respondent/Defendant:

Department of Human Services [2014] FWC 6722

Legislation Cited (4)

Work Act 2009

Superannuation Act 1988

Powers) Act 2009

Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904

Cases Cited (4)

(2004) 221 CLR 309

(1983) 159 CLR 163

(2005) 142 IR 289

(1947) 74 CLR 31

Find a lawyer

Employment lawyers across Australia: our picks by city

ZoeLaw is not a law firm. Picks are our opinion; we don't share your details.