[2016] VCAT 28
General information, not legal advice.
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
2016-01-13
Original judgment source is linked above.
Construction of a part three, part four storey building with roof top terraces accommodating dwellings, reduction from the statutory car parking requirements and alteration of vehicle access to a Road Zone Category 1
Implementation of Sustainable Design Initiatives
Incorporation of Sustainable Design initiatives
Incorporation of Water Sensitive Urban Design initiatives
Maintenance Manual for Water Sensitive Urban Design Initiatives
The WSUD Maintenance Manual may form part of a broader Maintenance Program that covers other aspects of maintenance such as a Builder' User's Guide or a Building Maintenance Guide.
Landscape Plan
Once submitted and approved, the waste management plan must be carried out to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority
Melbourne Water Conditions:
All to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority.
Parking Areas Must Be Available
Upon approval the Response will be endorsed as part of the planning permit and the project must incorporate the Water Sensitive Design initiatives listed.
Incorporation of Water Sensitive Urban Design initiatives
Site Management Water Sensitive Urban Design
In accordance with Section 69 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987, an application may be submitted to the Responsible Authority for an extension of the periods referred to in this condition.
[1] Section 4(2)(d) of the Victorian Civil & Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 states a failure to make a decision is deemed to be a decision to refuse to make the decision.
[2] We have considered the submissions of all the parties that appeared, all the written and oral evidence, all the exhibits tendered by the parties, and all the statements of grounds filed. We do not recite or refer to all of the contents of those documents in these reasons.
[3] Plan Melbourne: Metropolitan Planning Strategy (Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure, 2014).
[4] We note that the Parties all referred to a different maximum height (depending on what plan and where the height was read). We have adopted 13.65 metres for the purpose of this decision as referred to by Mr Sheppard.
Gurner 278 Kings Way Pty Ltd
Port Phillip CC [2016] VCAT 28