[2011] VCAT 748
General information, not legal advice.
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
2011-04-29
Original judgment source is linked above.
Construction of a single storey building for use as a child care centre and associated car park
The plans must be substantially in accordance with the plans submitted with the application but modified to show to the satisfaction of the Responsible Authority:
- a minimum four canopy trees within the Hammer Street front setback with a minimum pot size of 40L.
- a minimum of four canopy trees adjacent to the eastern boundary with a minimum pot size of 40L.
- suitable landscaping adjacent to the western side of the proposed driveway which is of a type which will not impact on the footings of the existing church building.
- provision of landscaping along the eastern side of the proposed driveway.
Parking areas and access lanes must be kept available for these purposes at all times.
The Responsible Authority may extend the periods referred to if a request is made in writing before the permit expires or within three months afterwards.
[1] I have considered all submissions, evidence and accompanying material, assisted by my inspection. I do not recite all of the material presented as all documentation is retained on the Tribunal's file.
[2] 1996/38819 K & B Reichert v Banyule CC
[3] In the previous decision a car park at the rear was proposed for staff parking only, accessed via an existing laneway.
[4] Sheahan & Ors v Hobsons Bay CC [2010] VCAT 64
[5] Sheahan & Ors v Hobsons Bay CC [2010] VCAT 64
Grove & Ors
Hobsons Bay CC [2011] VCAT 748
Sheahan & Ors v Hobsons Bay CC [2010] VCAT 64