[2014] FWC 8342
General information, not legal advice.
Fair Work Commission
2014-12-22
Commissioner Hampton
Original judgment source is linked above.
(#P49_4758) Section 397 of the Act.
(#P52_5119) Gomes v OE & DR Pope Pty Ltd T/A Pope Packaging [2014] FWC 4482.
(#P145_15501) A skilled machine operator in the extrusion section of the Woodville plant.
(#P150_16347) Based upon Randstad invoicing.
(#P163_18653) There was some indication that an additional qualification was required - evidence of Mr Doak. However, there was no requirement of that sort as part of an advertisement recently placed for a position in the stores (Transcript PN1866).
(#P204_22978) Selvachandran v Peterson Plastics Pty Ltd (1995) 62 IR 371 as cited in Potter v WorkCover Corporation, (2004) 133 IR 458 per Ross VP, Williams SDP, Foggo C and endorsed by the Full Bench in Industrial Automation Group Pty Ltd T/A Industrial Automation [2010] FWAFB 8868, 2 December 2010 per Kaufman SDP, Richards SDP and Hampton C at par [36].
(#P207_23658) See s.119 of the Act and Whittaker v Unisys Australia Pty Limited [2010] VSC 9.
(#P214_24577) Chubb Security Australia Pty Ltd v Thomas, 2 February 2000, Print S2679 at [41].
(#P215_24709) Crozier v Palazzo Corporation Pty Ltd (2000) 98 IR 137 at [73].
(#P236_26384) Transcript PN2011.
(#P243_26717) See UES (Int'l) Pty Ltd v Harvey [2012] FWAFB 5241 at [47] in relation to the relevance of a "valid" reason that does not fit within the scope of s.387(a) of the Act.
(#P250_28409) I note that although Kaufman SDP dissented from the majority on certain matters, he agreed at [67] with their approach on the capacity to have regard to the redundancy as a sound reason for dismissal under s.387(h).
(#P255_28888) [2011] FWA 4239.
(#P268_32017) See Ventyx Pty Ltd v Murray [2014] FWCFB 2143.
(#P273_32455) Relying upon Suridge v Boral Window Systems Pty Ltd [2013] FWA 3126.
(#P276_33633) Although set out in the context of s.392 of the Act, the observations of the Full Bench in Technical and Further Education Commission T/A TAFE NSW v Pykett [2014] FWCFB 714 at [35] are apposite.
(#P400_45683) Ibid at [48] to [53] and Anthony Smith v Sinclair (1996) 67 IR 240.
(#P409_46631) Kenley v JB Hi Fi AIRCFB, 22 June 2000, Print S7235 at [36]; Coal & Allied Mining Services Pty Ltd v Lawler [2011] FCAFC 54 and Lindsay Douglas Lawrence v Coal & Allied Mining Services Pty Ltd T/A Mt Thorley Operations/Warkworth [2010] FWAFB 10089.
(#P410_46983) Holcim (Australia) Pty Ltd v Mr Raimond Serafini [2011] FWAFB 7794.
(#P429_49282) PR559429.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
Gomes
OE & DR Pope Pty Ltd [2014] FWC 8342
(1995) 62 IR 371
(2004) 133 IR 458
(2000) 98 IR 137
(1996) 67 IR 240