Ghali v Sutherland Shire Montessori Society

(#P97_13406) [2014] FWC 2060 at [56] - [63], [79].

(#P100_13679) [2014] FWC 2060 at [64] - [69], [79].

(#P103_13819) [2014] FWC 2060 at [80].

(#P104_13914) [2014] FWC 2060 at [82].

(#P107_14245) [2014] FWC 2060 at [70].

(#P108_14571) [2014] FWC 2060 at [79].

(#P109_14922) [2014] FWC 2060 at [71] - [73].

(#P127_18166) See Appellant's Outline of Submissions (Exhibit S1) at [30].

(#P138_20161) See Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd v Australian Industrial Relations Commission [2000] HCA 47; (2000) 203 CLR 194 at 205.

(#P143_20873) Ibid at [21].

(#P146_21027) [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499

(#P149_21428) Ibid at 505.

(#P154_21703) Ibid at 504-505.

(#P157_22113) See s.400 of the Act.

(#P160_22336) The way in which the public interest requirement in s.400(1) may be attracted has been described as follows in GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd v Colin Makin [2010] FWAFB 5343 at [27]:

"...the public interest might be attracted where a matter raises issues of importance and general application, or where there is a diversity of decisions at first instance so that guidance from an appellate court is required, or where the decision at first instance manifests an injustice, or the result is counter intuitive or that the legal principles applied appear disharmonious when compared with other recent decisions dealing with similar matters."

(#P213_29859) (1893) 6 R 67.

(#P214_29974) [2014] FCAFC 15 at [74] - [78] per Mansfield and Gilmour JJ.

(#P231_33256) (1893) 6 R 67.

(#P236_35524) [2014] FWC 2060 at [92].

(#P237_35637) [2014] FWC 2060 at [90].

(#P252_39819) [2014] FWC 2060 at [84].

(#P255_40912) [2014] FWC 2060 at [91].

(#P256_41244) [2014] FWC 2060 at [64] - [69].

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer