CTHFCA
Gale v Homewood
[2024] FCA 1165
Federal Court of Australia|2024-09-20|Before: Perram J, Kennett J
View original sourceAt a glance
Source factsCourt
Federal Court of Australia
Decision date
2024-09-20
Before
Perram J, Kennett J
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Judgment (7 paragraphs)
[1]
BY CONSENT, THE COURT ORDERS THAT: Endorsement pursuant to Rule 41.06 PENAL NOTICE - Rule 41.06 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) TO: WADE JOHN HOMEWOOD IF YOU (BEING THE PERSON BOUND BY THIS ORDER):
- REFUSE OR NEGLECT TO DO ANY ACT WITHIN THE TIME SPECIFIED IN THIS ORDER FOR THE DOING OF THIS ACT; OR
- DISOBEY THE ORDER BY DOING AN ACT WHICH THE ORDER REQUIRES YOU NOT TO DO, YOU WILL BE LIABLE TO IMPRISONMENT, SEQUESTRATION OF PROPERTY OR OTHER PUNISHMENT. ANY OTHER PERSON WHO KNOWS OF THIS ORDER AND DOES ANYTHING WHICH HELPS OR PERMITS YOU TO BREACH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER MAY BE SIMILARLY PUNISHED.
- Pursuant to s 104.14(7)(c) of the Schedule to the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) (Criminal Code), the interim control order made in relation to the Respondent on 20 March 2024, and varied on 11 April 2024, be confirmed without variation in the terms of the confirmed control order set out in the Annexure to this order.
- This confirmed control order be in force until and including 19 March 2025.
- The Respondent's lawyer may attend the AFP Sydney office at 110 Goulburn Street, Sydney, NSW 2000 between 9.00 am to 4.00 pm, Monday to Friday in order to obtain a copy of this order. THE COURT NOTES THAT:
- This confirmed control order relates to the Respondent, Wade John Homewood.
- It is satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the Respondent has been convicted in Australia of an offence relating to terrorism (s 104.4(1)(c)(iv) of the Criminal Code).
- It is satisfied on the balance of probabilities that each of the conditions to be imposed (and the combined effect of all the conditions) on the Respondent by the order is reasonably necessary, and reasonably appropriate and adapted, for the purposes of:
- protecting the public from a terrorist act (s 104.4(1)(d)(iii) of the Criminal Code); or
- preventing the provision of support for or the facilitation of a terrorist act (s 104.4(1)(d)(iv) of the Criminal Code). Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT KENNETT J: