Fei Yu trading as Jewels 4 Pools v Beadcrete Pty Ltd

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This appeal was dismissed by orders made on 10 September 2014. The parties were then directed to exchange submissions as to costs and file the same within 14 days. 2 The appellants made no submissions. The respondents submitted that the appropriate order was that the appellants pay the respondents' costs of the appeal, referring to EMI Songs Australia Pty Ltd v Larrikin Music Publishing Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 92 at [9] and the principles and authorities there considered. 3 We agree that the appropriate costs order is as contended for by the respondents. This was not a mixed result case and there is no reason to depart from the general principle that a successful party will obtain an order for costs in its favour. I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justices Dowsett, Middleton and Robertson.