© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
austlii:cth/CthArbRp/1960/62
defendant. The application by the Federated Clerks Union of Australia was dismissed. The Commission held that neither the Clerks (Wool Stores Etc) Award 1955 nor the Wool Brokers Staff Interim Award 1954...
This case decided that clerks working at wool stores owned by petroleum companies weren't covered by wool industry awards. The court said that just because a company stores wool doesn't mean its clerks work 'in the wool industry.' The companies' main business was selling petrol, not wool. The wool storage was just a side activity. To be covered by a wool industry award, the work needed to have a real and substantial connection with the wool industry, not just an incidental one. The petroleum companies weren't wool brokers either, so a second award also didn't apply.
AI-generated legal information, not legal advice. Zoe can make mistakes. Check the cited source, and for advice about your situation consult a qualified Australian lawyer.
No linked legislation citations have been extracted yet.
alt: Plugin needed - click on link to download file: 62.pdf
Federated Clerks Union of Australia
Ampol
The application by the Federated Clerks Union of Australia was dismissed. The Commission held that neither the Clerks (Wool Stores Etc) Award 1955 nor the Wool Brokers Staff Interim Award 1954 applied to the clerical employees of Ampol Petroleum Ltd and Alba Petroleum Pty Ltd working at their wool stores.