[2025] NSWLEC 1763
General information, not legal advice.
Land and Environment Court (NSW)
2025-10-22
O’Neill C
Original judgment source is linked above.
Zoe will write a short plain-English summary of this judgment and email it to you for free: what it was about, what the court decided and why. It can take up to a minute.
General information, not legal advice.
Or create a free account to save it and ask Zoe follow-up questions.
Source: NSW Caselaw (www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au). Converted to plain text by ZoeLaw. Not the official version.
Medium Neutral Citation: Estia Investments Pty Ltd v Georges River Council [2025] NSWLEC 1763
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 17 October 2025
Date of orders: 22 October 2025
Decision date: 22 October 2025
Jurisdiction: Class 1
Before: O’Neill C
Decision: The orders of the Court are:
(1) The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application on 24 September 2025, in accordance with s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), in the agreed sum of $10,000, within 28 days of these orders.
(2) The appeal is upheld.
(3) Development Application No. 2023/0379, for the subdivision of three existing lots into two lots, at 392-394 and 394A Princes Highway, and 4 Torrens Street, Blakehurst NSW, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions at Annexure A.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties - orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 4.16, 8.7, 8.15
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), s 34
George River Local Environmental Plan 2021, cl 4.1
State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6
State Environmental Planning Policy (Transport and Infrastructure) 2021, ss 2.119, 2.122
Principal judgment
Parties: Estia Investments Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Georges River Council (Respondent)
Representation: Counsel:
K Garnock (Solicitor) (Applicant)
S Wilson (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Solicitors:
Mills Oakley (Applicant)
HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2024/475079
Publication restriction: No
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) (EPA Act) against the refusal of Development Application No. DA2023/0379, for subdivision of three (3) existing lots into two (2) lots (the proposal), at 392-394 and 394A Princes Highway, and 4 Torrens Street, Blakehurst (the site), by Georges River Council (the Council).
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 17 October 2025. I presided over the conciliation conference. At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision if the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.
The parties’ decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 4.16 of the EPA Act to grant consent to the development application. There are preconditions to the exercise of power to grant development consent for the proposal.
I am satisfied that the application complies with Ch 2 of the State Environmental Planning Policy (Transport and Infrastructure) 2021 (Transport and Infrastructure SEPP). Section 2.119 of the Transport and Infrastructure SEPP requires that a consent authority be satisfied with certain matters in relation to the safety and efficiency of access to developments from a classified road before consent can be granted. In this respect, the parties submitted the following:
Vehicular access to the Site is provided by a road other than the classified road (the existing driveway crossover on Torrens Street);
The safety, efficiency and ongoing operation of the classified road will not be affected by the development; and
Any future development on the site of a type that is sensitive to traffic noise or emissions will be appropriately located and designed, or include measures to ameliorate potential traffic noise or vehicle emissions within the site arising from the adjacent classified road, and will be assessed as part of a future development application.
As the application is for subdivision of three into two lots with no works proposed, the development is not considered 'Traffic-generating development' for the purposes of s 2.122 of the Transport and Infrastructure SEPP. Accordingly, referral to TfNSW is not required.
• To provide for the housing needs of the community within a high density residential environment.
• To provide a variety of housing types within a high density residential environment.
• To enable other land uses that provide facilities or services to meet the day to day needs of residents.
• To enable other land uses that contribute to the vibrancy of the neighbourhood while ensuring that business centres remain the focus for business and retail activity.
• To encourage development that maximises public transport patronage and promotes walking and cycling.
The orders of the Court are:
The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away as a result of the amendment of the application on 24 September 2025, in accordance with s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), in the agreed sum of $10,000, within 28 days of these orders.
The appeal is upheld.
Development Application No. 2023/0379, for the subdivision of three existing lots into two lots, at 392-394 and 394A Princes Highway, and 4 Torrens Street, Blakehurst, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions at Annexure A.
**********
Estia Investments Pty Ltd
Georges River Council [2025] NSWLEC 1763