[2025] VCC 705
General information, not legal advice.
County Court of Victoria
2025-05-30
Original judgment source is linked above.
Sentence: 15 months' imprisonment, Community correction orders 24 months with conditions, $200 fine
I am not fucking joking. I don't give a fuck. Open the fucken register now. I'm gonna whack you the fuck over the head, yeah. There's a big sting, yeah. Go straight to your fucking brain, yeah. I'm a brain surgeon. Bitch, open the fucking register.
I will break your fucking head open. I'll kill you. I will fucking kill you. You have five seconds before I smash your fucking head open ... open the fucken register.
Mr Brugman, you have relatively few prior convictions. 2. On 5 December 2011, on two charges of burglary, a charge of theft and a charge of criminal damage, you were convicted and placed on a community-based order for 12 months with conditions including that you undergo assessment and treatment for alcohol or drug addiction. You breached that order and on
19 September 2012. The contravention was found proven, and the original order was confirmed. 3. On 1 September 2023, without conviction, you were directed to write a letter of apology to the Bacchus Marsh Police for damage caused to police cells in May 2023 and you were ordered to donate $500 to the Blue Ribbon Foundation. That penalty was imposed in respect to a charge of doing an act prejudicial to the security, order and management of a gaol.
Mr Brugman submitted that this was in response to a number of personal issues, including your mother's and father's illnesses, and the death of a friend. You instructed Mr Brugman that you tried to 'wipe' yourself out with drugs. 4. Mr Brugman also referred to the fact that this is your first time in prison and because of your mental health issues you have struggled within the prison environment. You are placed in the psychiatric unit at Ravenhall Prison and you are experiencing difficulty with your fellow prisoners. However, notwithstanding those difficulties, you have been working as a yard billet and have completed several courses, including a positive parenting course. You maintain weekly telephone contact with your mother and father. 5. Mr Brugman relied on the reports of Ms Cidoni and Professor Darjee as to the burden of imprisonment upon you given your diagnosis of ASD, cognitive impairment, and Adjustment Disorder. 6. Professor Darjee, as I earlier stated, considers that your ASD has predisposed you to difficulties in prison and that your problems with stress, anxiety, coping and
self-harm warrant an additional diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder. 7. At paragraph 55 of his report, Professor Darjee states that due to your ASD, you have had problems coping in prison and you struggle to interact with others and to deal with the unfamiliar environment. This has led to distress, anxiety and
self-harm. In his view, prison is likely to be significantly more difficult for you than for people without your mental health issues. He considers you will remain vulnerable to further deterioration, with anxiety, distress, dysregulation, suicidal ideation and self-harm in prison. 8. Mr Brugman submitted that your sentence should be moderated on account of the psychological evidence giving rise to Verdins' principles 5 and 6. 9. Regarding the risk of you committing similar offences in the future, Mr Brugman submitted that you are not normally a violent person and have no prior convictions for violent offences. 10. He also submitted that your pleas of guilty were entered early and reflect your genuine remorse, noting that when you learned of what you had done, you expressed shock, disgust and embarrassment. 11. Mr Brugman submitted that a combination sentence was open and that a community correction order is both punitive and may also serve to assist in your rehabilitation. 12. Ms Pezzimenti submitted that armed robbery and attempted armed robbery are serious offences, and your conduct has had a profound and significant impact on Ms Liu. It was also submitted that the victims of the other offences, although not having provided victim impact statements, would also have been frightened by your conduct. They were all persons who were working and who should have a right to work without being confronted by someone such as yourself behaving in the way you did while armed with a weapon. There is a strong need,
Ms Pezzimenti submitted, for others minded to commit armed robberies to be deterred. 13. Ms Pezzimenti did not take issue with your cognitive difficulties and the diagnoses set out in the reports of Ms Cidoni and Professor Darjee. No issue was taken with the application of Verdins' principles 5 and 6 as 'going some way to moderating the sentence' to be imposed. Notwithstanding those matters, Ms Pezzimenti submitted that you should be sentenced to a term of imprisonment with a
non-parole period as this would best reflect the seriousness of your offending.
Ms Cidoni, Professor Darjee, Ms Stephen and your mother. 4. Ms Cidoni writes that you expressed confusion and disbelief over the situation, describing it as a nightmare and asserting that you would never have acted violently if sober. You said you were shocked when you heard and saw the recordings of your aggressive behaviour and felt terrible about what you did. You expressed similar sentiments to Professor Darjee. 5. Although your drug use does not excuse what you did, in the circumstances of this case, I consider it has some impact on my assessment of the level of your moral culpability, as does your low level of cognitive functioning. Ms Cidoni considers you are cognitively impaired and recommended further investigation by a neuropsychologist to determine your strengths and weaknesses and to assess whether you have a comorbid disability. 6. Significant weight must attach to general deterrence, denunciation and just punishment. Persons who commit offences of the kind you committed, or who are tempted to commit such offences, should understand that they risk stern punishment should they do so. Your conduct, committed against persons going about their daily work must also be strongly denounced through the sentence to be imposed. There is also a need for the sentence to deter you from further offending, although the need for this is to be moderated given your limited criminal history and the deterrent effect that your period on remand appears to have had upon you. 7. The sentence to be imposed should also give effect to your rehabilitation, notwithstanding that your prospects of rehabilitation, in my opinion, are guarded at this time. Although you enjoy the support of your family, have only a limited criminal history, and have used your time in custody well, including working as a billet, undertaking courses, and being involved with the prison fellowship, you nevertheless have significant mental health and substance abuse issues that require appropriate treatment. 8. I accept, based on the reports of Ms Cidoni and Professor Darjee, that your cognitive impairment and mental health issues will render imprisonment a heavier burden upon you than on other prisoners who are not suffering mental health problems. I also accept that there is a serious risk of your condition deteriorating while in custody. Some moderation in sentence will be made on account of Verdins' principles 5 and 6. 9. In sentencing you I have also had regard to the comparative cases to which I was referred as well as other comparative sentencing decisions. Sentences passed in other cases may provide some assistance in informing the instinctive synthesis, but they are not precedents that must be followed. Each case must ultimately be decided by reference to the circumstances personal to the offender, the circumstances of the offending, and the aggravating and mitigating features present in the case. 10. Protection of the community from you is also an important sentencing consideration and in formulating the appropriate sentence, I have had significant regard to that consideration. I will return to it shortly.
DPP
White [2025] VCC 705