Now, moving to where we left off, the risk management scale - would you be prepared to be - you've given high scores on each of plans lacking feasibility, high possibility of exposure to destabilisers, high probability of noncompliance and high probability of stress exposure. Would you be prepared to modify each of those?---I would. There is one entry, however, in this report that says that his accommodation has not been confirmed.
No, and don't worry, we're making contact with Mr [D] as the case is progressing, but if you just accept the assumption that the accommodation is available to him. Assuming that, would you be prepared to modify each of those particular factors?---I would.
To what level? You've given them a high ranking?---Yes, I do understand what you mean. Probably to low to moderate.
Low to moderate, yes. I suppose factors which would lead you to that are even though he's in a dry community there's the possibility that he could still travel into a community where there is alcohol - come into town?---And also there is no place where there is 100 per cent dry community.
Exactly. There's no place where there are no females?---That's correct.
But it is fair to say this, is it not, that upon reading Ms Harris's report and accepting that that's the plan for him if there be supervision, you'd be hard-pressed to say that it doesn't lack feasibility, wouldn't you?---I agree.
And on the issue of high probability of noncompliance, at least the plan and his commitment to remaining alcohol-free seems to be genuine?---Yes.
His genuineness in that regard is something that even though it might have been expressed crudely and simply, that he did indicate to you in interview?---Yes.