Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

Dale v Hatch Pty Ltd [2016] FWCFB 922 | Case summary | Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[2016] FWCFB 922

CTHFWCFB

Dale v Hatch Pty Ltd [2016] FWCFB 922

[2016] FWCFB 922

Fair Work Commission (Full Bench)|2016-02-15|Before: Hatcher VP

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Fair Work Commission (Full Bench)

Decision date

2016-02-15

Before

Hatcher VP

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Plain-English guides

Unfair dismissal at the Fair Work Commission (Form F2)Australia (Commonwealth)
Recover unpaid wages through Fair Work Ombudsman and small claimsAustralia (Commonwealth)
Unfair deactivation for gig and employee-like workersAustralia (Commonwealth)

Judgment (17 paragraphs)

[1]

(#P28_486) [2015] FWC 4970

[2]

(#P29_678) PR572764

[3]

(#P54_3868) Decision at [76]

[4]

(#P59_4812) Decision at [80]-[81]

[5]

(#P60_5095) Decision at [83]-[87]

[6]

(#P67_5673) Decision at [76]

[7]

(#P68_5904) (1998) 84 IR 52 at 66

[8]

(#P69_6052) [1995] IRCA 293

[9]

(#P78_8761) Decision at [76]

[10]

(#P79_9358) Macquarie Online Dictionary

[11]

(#P82_10321) PR904665, [2001] AIRC 500

[12]

(#P91_12538) PR917230, [2002] AIRC 475

[13]

(#P94_12936) [2013] FWC 9791

[14]

(#P181_23861) (1994) 126 ALR 121

[15]

(#P182_24198) (1994) 126 ALR 121 at 125-6; see also Cooper v Darwin Rugby League Inc. (1994) 57 IR 238 and Ledington v University of Sunshine Coast (2003) 127 IR 152

[16]

(#P183_24691) Ledington at [34]

[17]

(#P186_25375) [2015] FWC 4248

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Dale

Respondent/Defendant:

Hatch Pty Ltd [2016] FWCFB 922

Legislation Cited (2)

Work Act 2009

Relations Act 1988

Cases Cited (4)

(1998) 84 IR 52

(1994) 126 ALR 121

(1994) 57 IR 238

(2003) 127 IR 152

Find a lawyer

Employment lawyers across Australia: our picks by city

ZoeLaw is not a law firm. Picks are our opinion; we don't share your details.