Zoe

United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe
Recently analysed

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court

Zoe

United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe
Recently analysed

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.

Curran v Young - [1965] HCA 14 - HCA 1965 case summary — Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[1965] HCA 14

CTHHCA

Curran v Young

[1965] HCA 14

High Court of Australia|1965-04-08|Before: Owen JJ, Hilbery J, Devlin J

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

High Court of Australia

Decision date

1965-04-08

Before

Owen JJ, Hilbery J, Devlin J

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (1 paragraphs)

[1]

For the reasons given by Taylor J. I agree that the appeal should be dismissed.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Curran

Respondent/Defendant:

Young

Cases Cited (1)

High Court of Australia Barwick C.J. McTiernan, Kitto, Taylor and Owen JJ. Curran v Young [1965] HCA 14

Cited By (1)

Trustees of the Sydney Grammar School v Winch