(b) five pages from the Incident Report and Case Progress and a one page Attendance Record Enquiry (denied access to victim's name, address, date of birth and telephone number and allegations as well as names and registered numbers of attending police).

1. Exemptions are claimed under Sections 30(1), 33(1) and 35(1)(b).
2. For the reasons previously given the exemption under Section 33(1) should be sustained with respect to this document. I observe with respect to this document and others that Mr Corry is likely already well aware of the names in question. The nature of the 'LEAP' system was not explored in evidence before me. It is sufficiently notorious that I believe I am entitled to notice that it is a computer system used to log the activities of Victoria Police and actual or alleged offences. It is difficult to see that such a computer program could be regarded as part of Victoria Police's deliberative processes or that its contents could be characterised as constituting or revealing opinion, recommendation or advice. The exemption claimed under Section 30(1) is not made out.
3. The exemption with respect to Section 35(1)(b) is claimed in relation to a portion of the printout under the heading 'case progress narrative' and the sub-heading 'additional information'. This additional information includes the substance of the complaint. For reasons which I have given previously I do not believe that the exemption under Section 35(1)(b) should be regarded as made out with respect to this part of the text. Complainants of domestic violence will not be deterred from making complaints by the knowledge that their complaints may be ventilated at some time in the future. Many or most of these complaints are ventilated in court anyway. In so far as this text includes a narrative as distinct from merely names and personal particulars, whilst it could be regarded as personal information, I would not in the circumstances regard the disclosure of such personal information as being unreasonable. Whilst the information might be personal to the complainant (his ex-wife) in this case it is also personal to the applicant. Accordingly, the Section 33(1) exemption with respect to this document is to be regarded as made out only with respect to names and personal particulars, not with respect to narrative details.
4. The next document designated document 4(a) is described as:

Parts of two one page letters dated 23.4.08 from O/Sergeant Storer, Kyabram Uniform to two members of police

Access has been denied to the name and rank of the two members

1. For reasons previously given the exemption under Section 33(1) is made out with respect to these documents.
2. The next document designated 4(b) was described as:

Parts of three one page undated letters from D/A/S/Sergeant Mark, Shepparton CIU to three members of police (denied access to the name and rank of the three members and to the name and other personal information of the civilian who complained against the applicant).

1. For reasons previously given the exemption under Section 33(1) is made out with respect to this document. Again, I observe that the name of the individuals involved are probably already well known to Mr Corry.
2. The next document is described as:

Part of a one page memorandum from A/Inspector Macgregor, Region 3 Ethics and Professional Standards Officer (EPSO) to EPSO Support - Conduct and Professional Standards Division dated 29.4.08 (denied access to name and rank of two police members).

1. The exemption under Section 33(1) is for reasons previously given made out with respect to this document.
2. The next document designated 4(d) is:

Part of a one page memorandum from A/Inspector Cliffe EPSO Region 3 to D/Sgt Mark Shepparton CIU dated 4.11.08 (denied access to name and rank of two police members).

1. For reasons previously given this exemption under Section 33(1) is upheld.
2. The next document is described as:

Part of a one page memorandum from A/Inspector Cliffe to EPSO Support Unit dated 2.12.09 (denied access to name and rank of four police members).

1. For reasons previously given this exemption under Section 33(1) of the Act is upheld.
2. The next document is designated Document 4(f) and described as:

Part of a one page memorandum from A/Inspector Carroll EPSO Region 3 to Superintendent Johns (denied access to information that identifies crime family violence applicants).

1. For reasons previously given this exemption under Section 33(1) is upheld.
2. The next document designated Document 5(a) is described as:

Two page memorandum from a named member of police to S/Sgt Mark responding to applicant's complaint.

1. Access has been denied in full and exemptions have been claimed under Sections 30(1), 33(1) and 35(1)(b ). For the reasons given with respect to Document 1(b) the exemptions relative to Section 30(1) and 35(1)(b) have not been made out with respect to this document. The exemption with respect to Section 33(1) relative to the names and particulars of police officers and complainant for reasons previously given are established under Section 33(1). In my view the same conclusion should be reached with regard to Document 5(b) which is described as:

Two page memorandum from a named member of police to S/Sgt Mark responding to applicant's complaint.

1. Documents six, seven, eight and nine are all the subject of exemption claimed under Section 33(1) relative to the names of police members and names of complainant. For reasons previously given the exemptions under Section 33(1) are upheld.

1. Mr Corry made extensive reference to the public interest invoking the public interest override under Section 50(4) of the Freedom of Information Act. The only exemption which I have upheld are under Section 33(1) of the Freedom of Information Act. By its own terms the public interest override does not avail against this exemption, hence there is no occasion to consider the arguments relative to the public interest override.

(a) Part of a one page email form S/Sgt Hilary Mark to Supt Johns dated 15.10.08 - (denied access to name of police member complained against and to name of support staff member to Supt Johns);

(b) One page email from named member of police to S/Sgt Mark dated 23.9.08 responding to particulars of complaint - (denied in full);

(c) Part of one page email from A/Sgt Storer to two named members of police undated - (denied access to names of members complained against by applicant);

(d) Two page email from two named members of police to A/Sgt Storer dated 5.2.09 responding to applicant's complaint - (denied in full).

Parts of 4 pages of a Patrol Duty Return - (denied access to names of patrolling police members, names and other information of alleged victim and name of other person and date of birth).

Parts of 7 pages of Victoria Police LEAP reports comprising:

(a) one page Family Incident Report Summary - (denied access to name and other identifying details of aggrieved family member and to indicators including opinion);

(b) five pages from the Incident Report and Case Progress and one page Attendance Report Enquiry - (denied access to victim's name, address, date of birth and telephone number and allegations as well as names and registered numbers of attending police).

(a) Parts of two 1-page letters dated 23.4.08 from A/Sergeant Storer, Kyabram Uniform to two members of police - (denied access to the names and rank of the two members);

(b) Parts of three 1-page undated letters from D/A/S/Sergeant Mark, Shepparton CIU to three members of police - (denied access to the names and rank of the three members and to the name and other personal information of the civilian who complained against the applicant);

(c) Part of a one page memorandum from A/Inspector McGregor, Region 3 Ethics and Professional Standards Officer (EPSO) to EPSO Support - Conduct & Professional Standards Division dated 29.4.08 - (denied access to name and rank of two police members);

(d) Part of a one page memorandum from A/Inspector Cliffe EPSO Region 3 to D/Sgt Mark Shepparton CIU dated 4.11.08 - (denied access to name and rank of two police members);

(e) Part of a one page memorandum from A/Inspector Cliffe to EPSO Support Unit dated 2.12.08 - (denied access to name and rank of four police members);

(f) Part of a one page memorandum from A/Inspector Carroll EPSO Region 3 to superintendent Johns - (denied access to personal information that identifies crimes family violence applicant).

(a) Two page memorandum from a named member of police to S/Sgt Mark responding to applicant's complaint - denied in full

(b) Two page memorandum from a named member of police to S/Sgt Mark responding to applicant's complaint - denied in full

Parts of a three page memorandum of investigation report from D/Sgt Mark to Police Service Area (PSA) Manager Shepparton dated 21.10.08 - (denied access to names of police members complained against by applicant and to name of victim)

Parts of the first page of a two page letter from Office of Police Integrity to Ethical Standards Department dated 16.2.09 - (denied access to names of police members complained against by applicant and to name of victim)

Part of a one page Issue Cover Sheet by A/Sgt Storer dated 13.2.08 - (denied access to names of police members and to name and other personal information of victim)

Parts of the three page Ethical Standards Department file C2-5/1895/2007 cover sheet - (denied access to the names of three unsworn members of police (ie. public servants))