Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Billiton Nickel West Pty Ltd [2017] FWCFB 217

(#P60_7374) [2016] FWC 3829, [182].

(#P63_7723) Ibid [200].

(#P66_7811) Ibid [203].

(#P67_7921) Ibid [207]-[216].

(#P98_11450) Re Cram; Ex parte Newcastle Wallsend Coal Co Pty Ltd [1987] HCA 29; (1987) 163 CLR 140 and authorities referred to therein.

(#P99_11879) Ranger Uranium Mines Pty Ltd; Ex parte FMWU [1987] HCA 63; (1987) 163 CLR 656.

(#P120_18106) PR940630.

(#P143_23326) (2002) 123 IR 216, [24]-[26].

(#P148_23984) (2003) 132 IR 13.

(#P155_25248) Re Cram; Ex parte Newcastle Wallsend Coal Co Pty Ltd [1987] HCA 29; (1987) 163 CLR 140, 149.

(#P160_25965) Transcript of proceedings before Commissioner O'Connor, 12 November 2002, [192].

(#P197_30610) "noting that passing references have been made to s 490(2) in AMIEU v Fair Work Australia [2012] FCAFC 85 at [56] (Flick J) (AMIEU v FWA) and CFMEU v Austral Bricks (Vic) Pty Ltd [2014] FWC 5407, [29] and [37] (Gostencnik DP) (Austral Bricks)".

(#P206_31291) cf Bechtel Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd and another [2014] FWC 5900, [37].

(#P211_31983) Zines, p 192. See also Queen Victoria Memorial Hospital v Thornton [1953] HCA 11; (1953) 87 CLR 144.

(#P214_32174) Re Ranger Uranium Mines Pty Ltd; Ex parte Federated Miscellaneous Workers' Union Australia [1987] HCA 63; (1987) 163 CLR 656 at [18] (Mason CJ, Wilson, Brennan, Deane, Dawson, Toohey and Gaudron JJ).

(#P215_32643) Re Ranger Uranium Mines, [25]; Re Dingjan; Ex parte Wagner (1995) 183 CLR 323, 360-361; Zines, 175.

(#P216_32852) "cf the curious contention at [34] of the Respondent's submissions where the erroneous assertion is made that matters of statutory interpretation are a distinctly judicial function".

(#P217_33078) Re Cram; Ex parte NSW Colliery Proprietors' Association Ltd [1987] HCA 28; (1987) 163 CLR 117, 165.

(#P218_33448) Precision Data Holdings Ltd v Wills (1991) 173 CLR 167, 185.

(#P221_33802) "See Bechtel Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd and another [2014] FWC 5900 at [38], where it was also noted that the dispute (which was premised on past behaviour) in substance and having regard to the orders sought was about regulating the future conduct of the permit holders".

(#P222_34288) See generally Bechtel Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd and another [2014] FWC 5900, approved on this point on appeal in Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union and others v Bechtel Construction (Australia) Pty Ltd and another [2015] FWCFB 946 at [21] and [32].

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer