[2026] FWC 1143

Fair Work Act 2009

s.236 - Application for a majority support determination

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia

Application for a majority support determination. QLD High Loads Pty Ltd.

[1] On 25 February 2026, the Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia - Queensland and Northern Territory Divisional Branch (the Applicant/ETU) made an application to the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) under section 236 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) for a majority support determination.

[2] The ETU, sought to negotiate a single-enterprise agreement with the following coverage:

"Employees of Qld High Loads Pty Ltd performing work in Queensland, other than employees in managerial or administrative roles."

[3] The ETU contend that a majority of relevant employees who would be covered by a proposed enterprise agreement want to bargain with their employer. Accompanying the application were the statement of Mr Leonard Lane and copies of correspondence between the ETU and the QLD High Loads Pty Ltd (the employer).

[4] The ETU wrote to the employer on 10 December 2025 formally requesting the commencement of negotiations for an Enterprise Agreement. The employer responded by way of an email, dated 16 January 2026, stating that:

"QHL does not consider that enterprise bargaining is necessary or appropriate in the circumstances"

[5] No further advice was received from the employer in relation to this matter, as such the employer had not agreed to bargain.

[6] On 3 March 2026, I issued Directions requiring the parties to file material with respect to the application including material relating to the petitions referred to in the application and a list of all employees to be covered by the proposed agreement. This material was provided to the Commission only, so as to ensure confidentiality.

[7] I note that parties were invited to raise any objections, but no objections were raised by either party.

[8] Upon receiving the required materials from the parties, I conducted an analysis to determine if a majority of eligible employees had signed the petition, indicating that they wished to bargain.

[9] In completing this analysis, I compared the names of employees who had signed the petition against the list of employees provided by the employer and was satisfied that a majority of employees wanted to bargain for an enterprise agreement.

[10] The Commission must make a majority support determination if an application for the determination has been made and if the Commission is satisfied of those matters set out in section 237(2) of the Act. An application for a determination is made pursuant to section 236 of the Act, which provides as follows:

(1) A bargaining representative of an employee who will be covered by a proposed single enterprise agreement may apply to the FWC for a determination (a majority support determination) that a majority of the employees who will be covered by the agreement want to bargain with the employer, or employers, that will be covered by the agreement.

(a) the employer, or employers, that will be covered by the agreement; and

(b) the employees who will be covered by the agreement.

[11] I must make a majority support determination if an application has been made before the Commission that satisfies the criteria contained in section 237 of the Act. Section 237 of the Act provides as follows:

237 When the FWC must make a majority support determination

(1) The FWC must make a majority support determination in relation to a proposed single enterprise agreement if:

(a) an application for the determination has been made; and

(b) the FWC is satisfied of the matters set out in subsection (2) in relation to the agreement.

Matters of which the FWC must be satisfied before making a majority support determination

(i) who are employed by the employer or employers at a time determined by the FWC;

(b) the employer, or employers, that will be covered by the agreement have not yet agreed to bargain, or initiated bargaining, for the agreement; and

(c) that the group of employees who will be covered by the agreement was fairly chosen; and

(d) it is reasonable in all the circumstances to make the determination.

(3) For the purposes of paragraph (2)(a), the FWC may work out whether a majority of employees want to bargain using any method the FWC considers appropriate.

(3A) If the agreement will not cover all of the employees of the employer or employers covered by the agreement, the FWC must, in deciding for the purposes of paragraph (2)(c) whether the group of employees who will be covered was fairly chosen, take into account whether the group is geographically, operationally or organisationally distinct.

(4) The determination comes into operation on the day on which it is made.

[12] With respect to the requirements of section 236, the ETU is a bargaining representative of the employees in question and is entitled under its registered rules to represent the industrial interests of those employees. The ETU's application specifies the employer and employees who will be covered by the agreement and as such, has been validly made.

[13] The first matter prescribed by section 237 is whether the Commission is satisfied that a majority of the relevant employees who are employed by the employer at a time determined by the Commission want to bargain.

[14] The employer has submitted that there will be 5 employees who will be covered by the proposed enterprise agreement. However, material from the ETU indicates that there will be 6 employees covered by the proposed agreement. I note that, for the purpose of this decision, it is not necessary to determine this issue, as there is a clear majority regardless of which figure is accepted.

[15] A comparison of these employees, against the petitions provided by the ETU confirms that at least 4 of those employees want to bargain. I am therefore satisfied that the requirements of section 237(2)(a) have been met.

[16] It is evident from the material provided that the Respondent has not yet agreed to bargain or initiated bargaining in respect of the proposed enterprise agreement. As such, I am satisfied that the requirements of section 237(2)(b) have been met.

[17] Finally, pursuant to section 237(2)(d), given that the statutory requirements have been met and no other relevant issues arise, I am satisfied that it is reasonable in all the circumstances to make a determination.

• [18] Having formed the requisite satisfaction in relation to the matters in section 237(2) of the Act, I must make a majority support determination. A determination will be issued with this Decision.[1]

[1] PR798287.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer