The matter to be heard is not of a complex legal matter, only to decide whether I took all reasonable steps to avoid the relevant event. Therefore Legal Representation on behalf of the QBSA would complicate the hearing."

1. The Objects of the Act, as contained in section 3 and the Tribunals functions as set out in section 4, are to ensure that matters are dealt with fairly, economically, informally and quickly to ensure that costs are minimised. Clearly there are cases which involve complexities justifying the need for legal representation, however this is not one of those cases. The basic facts are set out in the submissions already filed by the applicant and although these facts will be tested by the Authority, it does not seem to me that it will not be at a disadvantage if it is restricted to using one of it's own legal officers.

2. Importantly, the Authority's legal officers are familiar with the statutory

regime in which the Authority operates not only the Queensland Building Services Authority Act, but also associated legislation. This knowledge is of great assistance to the Tribunal when determining, not only applications for review of it's decisions, but also in contractual disputes between home owner and licensees. This also then results in the efficient conduct of hearings in which the Authority is involved. They are also experienced in conducting hearings in the Tribunal.

1. For the reasons stated, I have come to the conclusion that the application

for legal representation will be refused. However, it is appropriate that the Authority, be given leave pursuant to Rule 53 for it to appear through one of it's own legal practitioners.

[3] 4 (2005) CCT Q200-04 as well as 170 Coastal Constructions Pty Ltd v Queensland Building Services Authority (2008) QCCTB 111

[5] (2008) QCCTB 199

[6] Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Rules

[7] Delonga v QBSA (2004) QCCTB 26

[8] Letter to Commercial and Consumer Tribunal 25 November 2009