The Western Australian Industrial Relations Commission dismissed an employment-related application because the applicant failed to attend a scheduled hearing, despite being warned that non-attendance would result in dismissal. This is a standard procedural outcome when a party does not pursue their case.

Christopher York S Tan v The Bank's Family Trust Trading As QuantumBusiness Development [2004] WAIRComm 12458 (23 August 2004)

CITATION NO. 2004 WAIRC 12458

Result Application dismissed for want of prosecution

WHEREAS this is an application pursuant to section 29(1)(b)(ii) of the Industrial Relations Act 1979; and

WHEREAS the matter was listed for a show cause hearing on 23 August 2004 and the applicant was advised that failure to attend would lead to the application being dismissed; and

NOW THEREFORE, the Commission, pursuant to the powers conferred on it under the Industrial Relations Act 1979, hereby orders -

THAT the application be and is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution.

Christopher York S Tan v The Bank's Family Trust Trading As QuantumBusiness Development [2004] WAIRComm 12458

At a glance

Result

Cited legislation

Plain English Summary

Judgment (8 paragraphs)

Christopher York S Tan v The Bank's Family Trust Trading As QuantumBusiness Development [2004] WAIRComm 12458 (23 August 2004)

Parties

Legislation Cited (1)

AI Analysis