austlii:cth/FWCA/2025/4061
General information, not legal advice.
FWCA
2025-12-18
Original judgment source is linked above.
s.185 - Enterprise agreement
Application for approval of the Bidfood Adelaide Enterprise Agreement 2025
[1] Cater Plus Pty Ltd trading as Bidfood Adelaide (the Employer) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Bidfood Adelaide Enterprise Agreement 2025 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Agreement will apply to employees who are covered by either the Storage Services and Wholesale Award 2020 (Storage Award), Road Transport and Distribution Award 2020 (Road Transport Award), Clerks - Private Sector Award 2020 (Clerks Award), Commercial Sales Award 2020 (Commercial Award), or Meat Industry Award 2020 (Meat Award).
Inconsistencies with the National Employment Standards (NES)
[3] The Commission raised the following clauses of the Agreement with the Employer which appeared to be inconsistent with the NES:
Clause 3.5.4 provides that on termination the Employee authorises the Employer to deduct an amount equivalent to any overpayment of wages or allowances owed by an Employee from the Employee's termination monies. These provisions do not appear to limit the source of monies which may be deducted. The effect of this is that this clause appears to permit the employer to deduct employee's entitlements under the NES, inconsistent with Chapter 2 Part 2.2 Division 2 of the Act.
Clause 7.6.4 states that the Employer may deduct an amount for the loss or damage of protective clothing. This appears inconsistent with s.324 of the Act which provides for permitted deductions.
Clause 7.1.6 provides that employees may be required to undergo absenteeism management plans, which may specify the types of evidence an employee may provide to substantiate personal leave and require employees to provide notice of absence by deadlines. This provision is stated to operate notwithstanding any evidence requirements of the Act and therefore appears to attempt to exclude the NES.
[4] In accordance with the NES precedence term in clause 1.3.5 of the Agreement, these clauses will be read and interpreted in conjunction with the NES.
[5] The Commission raised the following issues with the Employer which are relevant to whether employees are better off overall under the Agreement compared to the relevant Award:
[6] The Employer provided written undertakings, submissions and spreadsheets to address the above BOOT issues. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Schedule 1.
[7] I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement. The undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
[8] I am satisfied that the patterns of work in the spreadsheets provided by the Employer are reasonably foreseeable for the purpose of s.193A(6) of the FW Act.
[9] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[10] The United Workers' Union (UWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it.
[11] In accordance with s.201(2), I note that the Agreement covers the UWU.
[12] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 December 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 October 2028.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer