United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe
Recently analysed

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court

District of Columbia

© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.

Cameron v O'Donnell - [2005] FCA 1413 - FCA 2005 case summary — Zoe

Legislation Cases Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Home/Cases/[2005] FCA 1413

CTHFCA

Cameron v O'Donnell

[2005] FCA 1413

Federal Court of Australia|2005-10-04|Before: Mr J, Marshall J

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Federal Court of Australia

Decision date

2005-10-04

Before

Mr J, Marshall J

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (8 paragraphs)

[1]

INDUSTRIAL LAW DOUGLAS CAMERON V ERIN O'DONNELL NSD 1465 OF 2005 MARSHALL J 4 OCTOBER 2005 MELBOURNE

[2]

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY NSD 1465 OF 2005

[3]

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

The application is dismissed. Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

[4]

VICTORIA REGISTRY NSD 1465 OF 2005

[5]

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 This proceeding was heard at the same time as Donnelly v O'Donnell [2005] FCA 1412. The issues for determination in this matter are not materially different from those raised in Donnelly. For the reasons given in Donnelly, this application must also be dismissed. I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Marshall.

[6]

Dated: 4 October 2005 Counsel for the Applicant: Mr J Pearce

[7]

Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J Beach QC and Dr S Donaghue

[8]

Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Cameron

Respondent/Defendant:

O'Donnell

Cases Cited (1)

[2005] FCA 1412