//
[2025] NSWCCA 144
General information, not legal advice.
Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW)
2025-09-12
Stern JA, Free JA, Rigg J
Original judgment source is linked above.
Zoe will write a short plain-English summary of this judgment and email it to you for free: what it was about, what the court decided and why. It can take up to a minute.
General information, not legal advice.
Or create a free account to save it and ask Zoe follow-up questions.
Source: NSW Caselaw (www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au). Converted to plain text by ZoeLaw. Not the official version.
Medium Neutral Citation: Beattie v R [2025] NSWCCA 144
Hearing dates: 12 September 2025
Date of orders: 12 September 2025
Decision date: 12 September 2025
Before: Stern JA; Free JA; Rigg J
Decision: (1) Grant the applicant leave to appeal from the sentence imposed on him in the District Court on 30 August 2024;
(2) Set aside the sentence and re-sentence the applicant to:
(a) a non-parole period of 3 years and 4 months, commencing on 25 January 2023, and expiring on 24 May 2026, and
(b) a balance of term of one year and eight months, expiring on 24 January 2028.
(3) The applicant will be first eligible for parole on 24 May 2026.
Catchwords: CRIME – appeals – appeal against sentence – driving offences – whether the sentencing judge erred in setting the commencement date of the sentence by failing to give effect to stated intention regarding totality – no question of principle – appeal upheld – applicant re-sentenced
Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37
Lehn v R (2016) 93 NSWLR 205; [2016] NSWCCA 255
Category: Principal judgment
Parties: Luka Beattie (Applicant)
Rex (Respondent)
Representation: Counsel:
R Rodger (Applicant)
F Sullivan (Respondent)
Solicitors:
Legal Aid (NSW) (Applicant)
Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2022/00219232
THE COURT**:** On 30 August 2024 the applicant, Luka Beattie, was sentenced in the District Court for two offences, with a series of offences taken into account on a Form 1. The substantive offences were aggravated dangerous driving occasioning grievous bodily harm, and failing to stop and assist after an impact causing grievous bodily harm. The applicant was sentenced by his Honour Barrow SC DCJ to an aggregate sentence of 5 years imprisonment commencing on 28 February 2023 and expiring on 27 February 2028 with a non-parole period of 3 years and 4 months expiring on 27 June 2026.
The applicant seeks leave to appeal pursuant to s 5(1)(c) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) against the sentence of imprisonment imposed upon him.
The single ground of appeal is that “The sentencing judge erred in setting the commencement date of the sentence by failing to give effect to his Honour’s stated intention with respect to accumulation.” Given the extremely confined nature of the asserted error, there is no need to set out the circumstances of the offending or the applicant’s personal circumstances.
The parties are agreed that his Honour, by oversight, failed to give effect to his stated intention, and that the appropriate commencement date is 25 January 2023.
The offending occurred on 26 July 2022, and on that date the applicant was arrested, charged, and refused bail.
The applicant was on bail for unrelated offending in February 2022 at the time of his arrest for the driving offences, and was also charged after his arrest with stealing two motor vehicles the day before the driving offences. These charges culminated in the imposition in the Local Court on 6 May 2024 of an aggregate 3 year sentence of imprisonment, ordered to commence on 17 July 2023. A non-parole period of 15 months was imposed, expiring on 16 October 2024.
The submission was advanced at first instance for the applicant that the commencement date of his sentence for the driving offences should be 27 July 2022. It is not clear why the day after his arrest was nominated; but the essential proposition was that there should be no accumulation upon the Local Court sentence. The Crown submitted that that applicant should receive credit for the period of approximately a year that was spent in custody between his arrest and the commencement of the sentence imposed in the Local Court, and some further allowance for totality.
His Honour indicated in his sentencing judgment that he proposed to:
“…take into account the period of effectively 12 months from 26 July 2022 to 16 July 2023 plus take into account the sentence currently being served and allow 6 months of that time to be solely referable to the Local Court offences.”
The applicant contends that the commencement date of 28 February 2023 for the driving offences imposed a degree of accumulation upon the Local Court offences greater than the six months his Honour stated he intended to effect; namely, about seven months.
The respondent agrees with this proposition. It is the agreed position of the parties, which we accept, that to reflect his Honour’s intention of six months accumulation upon the sentence imposed in the Local Court the correct commencement date of the sentence should have been 25 January 2023.
Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 does not require the Court to re-exercise the sentencing discretion in connection with an arithmetical error of this kind: see for example Lehn v R (2016) 93 NSWLR 205; [2016] NSWCCA 255 at [72].
For those reasons, the Court makes the following orders:
Grant the applicant leave to appeal from the sentence imposed on him in the District Court on 30 August 2024;
Set aside the sentence and re-sentence the applicant to:
(a) a non-parole period of 3 years and 4 months, commencing on 25 January 2023, and expiring on 24 May 2026, and (b) a balance of term of 1 year and 8 months, expiring on 24 January 2028.
**********
Beattie
R [2025] NSWCCA 144
(2014) 252 CLR 601
(2016) 93 NSWLR 205