Ballymont P/L & Anor v Ipswich City Council & Ors [2002] QCA 233
[2002] QCA 233
Court of Appeal (Qld)|2002-06-28|Before: McMurdo P, Fryberg and Wilson JJSeparate reasons, for judgment of each member of the court, each concurring as to the orders, made.
McMurdo P, Fryberg and Wilson JJSeparate reasons, for judgment of each member of the court, each concurring as to the orders, made.
Catchwords
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – Development control – Consents,
approvals and permits – Whether development conflicted
with the relevant
planning scheme – Whether judge took the relevant planning scheme criteria
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – Development control – Consents,approvals and permits – Whether development conflictedwith the relevantplanning scheme – Whether judge took the relevant planning scheme criteriainto accountENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING – Development control – Consents,approvals and permits – Where application must be refused–Interpretation of Local Government (Planning and Environment) Act 1990, s4.13(5A)Local Government (Planning and Environment) Act 1990 (Qld), s4.13(5), s 4.13(5A)Zhang v Canterbury City Council [2001] NSWCA 167(2001) 51 NSWLR 589,considered
Judgment (1 paragraphs)
[1]
Ballymont P/L & Anor v Ipswich City Council & Ors [2002] QCA 233 | Case summary | Zoe
City Solicitor - Ipswich City Council for the first respondent