© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
austlii:cth/CthArbRp/1937/156
defendant. The applications were dismissed. The Court held that it had no jurisdiction to make awards in respect of State railway employees because such employment was not 'industrial' within the meaning of...
This case concerned whether the Commonwealth industrial relations tribunal could make awards setting pay and conditions for employees of State government railway authorities. The Court decided that it could not, because the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act only covered 'industrial' employment relationships between private employers and employees, not the relationship between a State government and its servants. The Court said that running railways was a government function, not a commercial business, so the employment was not 'industrial'. Even though the Constitution had been changed in 1929 to remove a specific exclusion of State railways from Commonwealth power, the Court said this did not automatically bring State railway workers under the existing Act. The Parliament would need to pass new laws to do that.
AI-generated legal information, not legal advice. Zoe can make mistakes. Check the cited source, and for advice about your situation consult a qualified Australian lawyer.
No linked legislation citations have been extracted yet.
alt: Plugin needed - click on link to download file: 156.pdf
The applications were dismissed. The Court held that it had no jurisdiction to make awards in respect of State railway employees because such employment was not 'industrial' within the meaning of the Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904–1934 (Cth) and the State railway authorities were not 'employers' within the meaning of the Act.