Fair Work Act 2009

s.437 - Application for a protected action ballot order

Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union

Proposed protected action ballot of employees of Central Goldfields Shire Council

• [1] This is an application by the Australian Municipal, Administrative, Clerical and Services Union (ASU or Applicant) made under s.437 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act) for a protected action ballot order in relation to certain employees of Central Goldfields Shire Council (Central Goldfields Shire or Employer). I observe that the original application cited an additional respondent[1] that is also subject to the same single interest employer authorisation[2] that covers Central Goldfields Shire. The ASU subsequently advised that it sought to have the order made only against the Employer.

• [2] On 1 September 2025, the Commission was advised that the Employer, in effect, did not object to the Application.

• [3] In the circumstances, I have decided to grant leave to amend the application and determine the matter on the papers without holding a hearing.

• [4] On the basis of the material before me, including the declaration of Zoe Edwards, Deputy Branch Secretary, setting out the steps taken by the ASU in bargaining with the Employer and that it has been, and is, genuinely trying to reach agreement with Central Goldfields Shire, I am satisfied that there is a notification time in relation to the proposed agreement and that all of the requirements in s.443(1) of the Act have been met.

• [5] The ballot is to be conducted by Fair Vote Services Pty Ltd (Fair Vote). Fair Vote has been approved as an eligible protected action ballot agent under s.468A of the Act and consequently is authorised to conduct the ballot.

• [6] For the purposes of s.443(3)(c) of the Act, the Commission has determined that the date by which voting is to close is 16 September 2025.[3] This also establishes the ballot period for the purpose of s.448A(2) of the Act.
• [7] An Order has been separately issued in PR791294.

• [8] This matter will be assigned to another Member of the Commission to conduct the s.448A compulsory conciliation conference. That Member will issue an Order requiring the attendance of all bargaining representatives in the proposed enterprise agreement at the conference. It is likely that Directions will also be issued to ensure that the parties attend the conference ready to conduct meaningful negotiations.

[3] This is, in effect, 14 calendar days from the making of the Order and was the period sought in the application.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer