United States legal-change intelligence across legislation, regulation, and case law. Separate data plane, same Zoe spine.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Ask Zoe
Recently analysed

Company

Pricing
API
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Federal
Supreme Court

District of Columbia

© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the official source for authoritative text.

Australian Horizons (Vic) PL v Stonnington CC [2003] VCAT 2044 - VCAT 2003 case summary — Zoe

Legislation Cases Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Home/Cases/[2003] VCAT 2044

VICVCAT

Australian Horizons (Vic) PL v Stonnington CC [2003] VCAT 2044

[2003] VCAT 2044

Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal|2003-07-16

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal

Decision date

2003-07-16

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Judgment (5 paragraphs)

[1]

Australian Horizons (Vic) PL v Stonnington CC [2003] VCAT 2044 (16 July 2003)

[2]

Section 119 of The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 199; Order correcting a clerical mistakes.

[3]

RESPONDENTS: Stonnington City Council, Mirvac Projects Pty Ltd, Frances and Alan Kirzner and others

[4]

The responsible authority has drawn the Tribunal's attention to a clerical mistake in its order of 19 June 2003. Sub-clauses (g) and (h) of Condition No.6 should be numbered (f) and (g) respectively and in Condition No.9(f) the expression "posed' should read, 'posted'.

[5]

The Tribunal's order of 19 June 2003 is corrected, accordingly, pursuant to section 119 of The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998.

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

# Australian Horizons (Vic) PL

Respondent/Defendant:

Stonnington CC \[2003\] VCAT 2044