© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2010] VCAT 1778
Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
2010-11-05
Warren J
Original judgment source is linked above.
In permit application 469/2008/P a permit is granted and directed to be issued for the land at 211-212 Nepean Highway, Seaford. The permit will allow development of the land for 19 dwellings and create access to a road in a Road Zone Category 1 in accordance with endorsed plans and subject to the following conditions.
Parking areas and access lanes must be kept available for these purposes at all times.
Precautions are to include, appropriate signage to AS 1743 road works signing code of practice, the provision of adequate barricading of works, including trenches of Service Authorities and any other road openings sufficient to ensure public safety. All relevant permits are to be obtained from Council for works within the existing road reserves in addition to the planning permit.
Any variations to these requirements must be approved by the Responsible Authority in writing and supervised onsite by an arborist.
The Responsible Authority may extend the periods referred to if a request is made in writing before the permit expires or within three months afterwards.
[1] As shown on the plans substituted at the Tribunal.
[2] Noting that the clauses referred to are those in the State Planning Policy Framework (SPPF) amended by Amendment VC71 that was gazetted on 20 September 2010. The amendment incorporated a policy neutral translation of the SPPF but also includes new State planning policies that give expression to the adopted Government policies The Victorian Housing Strategy and Melbourne @ 5 Million.
[3] I have considered all submissions and evidence presented by the parties although I do not recite all of the contents in these reasons.
[4] As indicated on the Housing Directions Map at Clause 21.04 of the Scheme.
[6] Standard B6 at Clause 55.03-1 of the Scheme that would require a front setback of 7.8 metres with balconies to 5.3 metres.
[7] Seaford 7 Design Guidelines Neighbourhood Character Precinct Brochure referred to in the decision guidelines of DDO6 of the Scheme
[8] Comments from Council's urban designer dated 16 September 2 - 9 and provided by Mr Crack at the hearing.
[10] Although I note that there are currently sections of solid metal fencing dividing 211 and 212 towards the rear of the properties.
[11] Comments from Council's urban designer dated 16 September 2 - 9 and provided by Mr Crack at the hearing.
[12] Standard B22 at Clause 55.04-6 of the Scheme.
[14] In a letter to VCAT dated 14 April 2010.
[16] Prepared by Geoaquitards Environmental dated 4 August 2010.
[17] Clauses 12.02-2 Appropriate development of coastal areas and 13.01-1 Coastal inundation and erosion
Ausbuild Constructions Pty Ltd
Frankston CC [2010] VCAT 1778