austlii:cth/AICmr/2025/52
General information, not legal advice.
AICmr
2025-03-21
Original judgment source is linked above.
'AUP' and the Department of Health and Aged Care (Freedom of information) [2025] AICmr 52 (21 March 2025)
Decision and reasons for decision of Rocelle Ago
General Manager Freedom of Information Commissioner Case Management
Delegate of the Australian Information Commissioner for the purposes of s 55K of the Freedom of Information Act 1982
Freedom of Information - Respondent to process request following removal of practical refusal reason claim
s 54L of the FOI Act. 6. During the course of the IC review, the Department suggested a further revision to the applicant's request, which the applicant accepted. The revised request was for correspondence to and from 2 named individuals mentioning another named individual and an identified COVID-19 vaccine, excluding duplicates and email attachments. The Department has indicated that it no longer maintains that processing the applicant's revised request would amount to a substantial and unreasonable diversion of the Department's resources from its other operations (s 24AA(1)(a)(i)), and that it is able to process the revised request. 7. In an IC review of an access refusal decision, the Department bears the onus of establishing that their decision is justified or that I should give a decision adverse to the IC review applicant (s 55D(1)). 8. Based on the information before me, I am satisfied that the practical refusal reason no longer exists. 9. The Department must now process the applicant's request and notify the applicant of its decision within 30 days of receipt of this decision.
General Manager, Freedom of Information Case Management
Delegate of the Australian Information Commissioner for the purposes of s 55K of the Freedom of Information Act 1982
If a party to an IC review is unsatisfied with an IC review decision, they may apply under s 57A of the FOI Act to have the decision reviewed by the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART). The ART provides independent merits review of administrative decisions and has power to set aside, vary, or affirm an IC review decision.
An application to the ART must be made within 28 days of the day on which the applicant is given the IC review decision (see s 18(1) of the Administrative Review Tribunal Act 2024 and rule 5(3) of the Administrative Review Tribunal Rules 2024). An application fee may be payable when lodging an application for review to the ART. Further information is available on the ART's website (www.art.gov.au) or by telephoning 1800 228 333.
Making a complaint to the Commonwealth Ombudsman
If you believe you have been treated unfairly by the OAIC, you can make a complaint to the Commonwealth Ombudsman (the Ombudsman). The Ombudsman's services are free. The Ombudsman can investigate complaints about the administrative actions of Australian Government agencies to see if you have been treated unfairly.
If the Ombudsman finds your complaint is justified, the Ombudsman can recommend that the OAIC reconsider or change its action or decision or take any other action that the Ombudsman considers is appropriate. You can contact the Ombudsman's office for more information on 1300 362 072 or visit the Commonwealth Ombudsman's website at http://www.ombudsman.gov.au.
If you would like access to the information that we hold about you, please contact FOIDR@oaic.gov.au. More information is available on the Access our information page on our website.
[1] On the question of the processing deadlines that now apply, see Fletcher and Prime Minister of Australia [2013] AICmr 11 [33] - [38].