Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Zoe

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.

Aspen Pty Ltd v State Planning Commission [2012] WASAT 135 | Case summary | Zoe

Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Ask Zoe →

Home/Cases/[2012] WASAT 135

WAWASAT

Aspen Pty Ltd v State Planning Commission

[2012] WASAT 135

State Administrative Tribunal (WA)|2012-07-02

View original source

At a glance

Source facts

Court

State Administrative Tribunal (WA)

Decision date

2012-07-02

Catchwords

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Catchwords

Judgment (3 paragraphs)

[1]

The application for review is dismissed.
The decision of the respondent to impose condition 1 is affirmed.

[2]

I certify that this and the preceding [84] paragraphs comprise the reasons for decision of the State Administrative Tribunal.

[3]

___________________________________

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

Aspen Pty Ltd

Respondent/Defendant:

State Planning Commission

Legislation Cited (1)

Development Act 2005

Cases Cited (5)

SCHOFIELD and WESTERN AUSTRALIAN PLANNING COMMISSION [2012] WASAT 135 (2 July 2012)

Goldin & Anor v Minster for Transport [2002] NSWLEC 75; (2002) 121 LGERA 101

Mader and Western Australian Planning Commission [2011] WASAT 41

(2002) 121 LGERA 101

(2006) 149 LGERA 117