Argument against new clauses 25.7 and 25.8 (Andrews v Australia and New... [2015] FWCFB 1549 | Case summary

(#P40_1060) The Full Bench is constituted by Watson SDP, O'Callaghan SDP and Cribb C and is listed for hearing on 16 March 2015.

Fair Work Commission (Full Bench)|2015-03-11

(#P40_1060) The Full Bench is constituted by Watson SDP, O'Callaghan SDP and Cribb C and is listed for hearing on 16 March 2015.

(#P74_4781) Section 138

(#P81_5747) Section 136(1)

(#P84_6004) Section 136(2)

(#P85_6237) Section 142 (1)

(#P86_6304) Section 142 (2)

(#P95_7302) See footnote 1

(#P124_11703) [2012] HCA 30; (2012) 247 CLR 205 at 227, [45] - [46] and at 236, [78]

(#P125_11890) Ibid at 227, [44] - [45] and at 232 - 233, [62] - [63]

(#P136_13979) See footnote 1

(#P139_14564) See s.136 and s.139(1)(e)

(#P152_16971) Section 323(3) relevantly provides that if a modern award specifies a particular "method" by which the money (wages) must be paid, then the employer must pay the money by that method.

(#P153_17280) See Transcript PN127-PN129 and PN300

(#P154_17486) See footnote 1

(#P179_21384) Ibid

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

Argument against new clauses 25.7 and 25.8 (Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd

At a glance

Court

Decision date

Source

Judgment (17 paragraphs)

Parties

Legislation Cited (1)

Cases Cited (1)