//
[2026] VSC 47
General information, not legal advice.
Supreme Court of Victoria
2026-02-18
Irving AsJ
Original judgment source is linked above.
[2] Mr Miglani filed further affidavits which were not relevant to the issues in dispute.
[3] Specifically, Mr Miglani contends action should be commenced under Australian Consumer Law and Fair Trading Act 2012.
[4] [2013] VSCA 158; (2013) 42 VR 27, 40 [35].
[11] [2019] VSC 174, [51].
[12] [2009] FCA 398. See, in particular, [2]-[12] of his Honour's judgment.
[13] In Victoria, the designated local regulatory authority for the purposes of Chapter 5 of the LPUL is the VLSC: Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014, sch 1, s 10(1).
[15] See D'Orta-Ekenaike v Victoria Legal Aid [2005] HCA 12; (2005) 223 CLR 1, 30-1 [84]-[87].
[16] Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Gargan (No 2) [2009] FCA 398, [2] (Perram J), cited in LL v MM [2019] VSC 174, [51] (Ginnane J).
[17] (2019) 269 CLR 333, 339-40 [3] (Kiefel CJ, Bell, Keane and Gordon JJ), 355-6 [63] (Gageler J), 358 [70] (Nettle J), 369 [99] (Edelman J).
[18] Ibid 339 [1] (Kiefel CJ, Bell, Keane and Gordon JJ).
Miglani
Crisp [2026] VSC 47
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Extended litigation restraint orders - Application under s 17 of the Vexatious Proceedings Act 2014 (Vic) - Where leave to apply not sought under s 16 - Granting application constituting extreme remedy - Whether the applicant's commencement of proceedings is habitual and persistent - Number of proceedings commenced not rising to required level of frequency - Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Gargan (No 2) [2009] FCA 398 and LL v MM [2019] VSC 174 considered - Application refused.
(2013) 42 VR 27
(2005) 223 CLR 1
(2019) 269 CLR 333