© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2004] FCA 906
Federal Court of Australia
2004-04-30
Emmett J
Original judgment source is linked above.
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & MULTICULTURAL & INDIGENOUS AFFAIRS
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 In proceedings numbered 2434 of 2003, 2435 of 2003, 2741 of 2003, 2742 of 2003, 2743 of 2003, 2744 of 2003, 2745 of 2003, 2746 of 2003 and 2747 of 2003, these matters was commenced in the High Court by the filing either on 29 May or 11 June 2003 of draft order nisisupported by an affidavit. In each case the affidavit annexes the reasons for decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal ('the Tribunal') affirming a decision of the Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs ('the Minister') not to grant protection visa to the applicant together with a chronology. 2 The forms of order nisi in these matters consist of the same terms. They claim constitutional writ relief in respect of the decision of the Tribunal in question on the ground that the applicant was denied natural justice and procedural fairness. The particulars set out in the orders nisi refer generally to circumstances similar to those that were under consideration by the High Court in its decision in Muin v Refugee Review Tribunal & Ors, Lie v Refugee Review Tribunal & Ors (2002) 190 ALR 601 and the Tribunal. However, there is no evidence in support of the assertions contained in the orders nisi. 3 On the material presently before the Court, there is no arguable case shown for the grant of any constitutional relief. Accordingly, it is appropriate to refuse orders nisi. That, of course, would not necessarily preclude an applicant from commencing another proceeding seeking relief in respect of the decision of the Tribunal supported by appropriate evidence if such evidence is available. In each case I order that Order 51A rule 5(1) not apply. I refuse order nisi. I certify that the preceding three (3) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Emmett.
Solicitor for the Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor
Applicant S281 of 2003
Refugee Review Tribunal
(2002) 190 ALR 601