/

/

Where to start with an Australian legal problem: plain-English guides, with the legislation and case law behind them.

Platform

Legislation
Cases
Guides
Find a lawyer
Absurdities
Ask Zoe
Graph
Recently analysed

Free tools

Bond claim checker
Barking dog and noise diary
Support at Home statement check
All tools

Lawyers: our picks

Lawyers in Sydney
Lawyers in Melbourne
Lawyers in Brisbane
Lawyers in Perth
Family lawyers
Employment lawyers
Criminal lawyers
Wills and estates lawyers
Find a lawyer

Company

Pricing
API
Privacy
Terms
Support
X
LinkedIn
Instagram

Jurisdictions

Commonwealth
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
Australian Capital Territory
Northern Territory

© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.

Zoe gives general legal information, not legal advice. For the authoritative text, check the official register of the law's own jurisdiction, such as the Federal Register of Legislation for Commonwealth laws.

AB v Thryv Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 2590 | Case summary | Zoe

Legislation Cases Guides Find a lawyer Absurdities Ask Zoe Graph Pricing

Home/Cases/[2025] FWC 2590

CTHFWC

AB v Thryv Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 2590

[2025] FWC 2590

Fair Work Commission|2025-09-02

View original source

Ask Zoe how this case applies to you

Free, no account needed. General information, not legal advice.

General information, not legal advice.

At a glance

Source facts

Court

Fair Work Commission

Decision date

2025-09-02

Source

Original judgment source is linked above.

Related plain-English guides

Unfair dismissal at the Fair Work Commission (Form F2)Australia (Commonwealth)
Recover unpaid wages through Fair Work Ombudsman and small claimsAustralia (Commonwealth)
Unfair deactivation for gig and employee-like workersAustralia (Commonwealth)

Judgment (4 paragraphs)

[1]

The application is dismissed. An order [PR791334] will be issued with this decision.

[2]

[3] Sayer v Melsteel [2011] FWAFB 7498, [20].

[3]

[4] Walton v Mermaid Dry Cleaners Pty Ltd [1996] IRCA 267; (1996) 142 ALR 681, 685.

[4]

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

Parties

Applicant/Plaintiff:

AB

Respondent/Defendant:

Thryv Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 2590

Legislation Cited (2)

Work Act 2009

Work Regulations 2009

Cases Cited (5)

AB v Thryv Australia Pty Ltd [2025] FWC 2590 (2 September 2025)

[34] When considering whether there is a valid reason for termination, the decision of North J in Selvachandran v Peterson Plastics Pty Ltd [1995] IRCA 333; (1995) 62 IR 371 at 373 provides guidance as to what the Commission must consider:

(1995) 62 IR 371

(1995) 185 CLR 410

(1996) 142 ALR 681

Find a lawyer

Employment lawyers across Australia: our picks by city

ZoeLaw is not a law firm. Picks are our opinion; we don't share your details.