QLDIn ForceAct
Gaming Machine Act 1991
sec.257Seizure of document wrongly used as evidence of age
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.257
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Gaming Machine Act 1991.
### sec.257 Seizure of document wrongly used as evidence of age
If a contravention of section 255 consists in production of—
a genuine document that is, for the purposes of this Act, acceptable evidence of age of the person specified in the document; or
a false document that could reasonably be taken, for the purposes of this Act, to be genuine acceptable evidence of age;
the person to whom the document is produced must seize and confiscate the document and give it to an inspector or a police officer.
Maximum penalty—25 penalty units.
A person does not commit an offence by contravening subsection (1) if the person is not aware of the falsity of the representation as to age made by producing the document.
Subsection (1) does not require a person to seize or confiscate a document stored or displayed on a digital device if—
the device is used in the contravention of section 255 ; and
in contravening the section a person produced the device to display the following things, or an image or other design purporting to be the thing—
a digital authority;
a digital evidence of age;
a digital evidence of identity.
s 257 ins 1992 No. 35 s 12
amd 2020 No. 21 s 4
(sec.257-ssec.1) If a contravention of section 255 consists in production of— a genuine document that is, for the purposes of this Act, acceptable evidence of age of the person specified in the document; or a false document that could reasonably be taken, for the purposes of this Act, to be genuine acceptable evidence of age; the person to whom the document is produced must seize and confiscate the document and give it to an inspector or a police officer. Maximum penalty—25 penalty units.
(sec.257-ssec.2) A person does not commit an offence by contravening subsection (1) if the person is not aware of the falsity of the representation as to age made by producing the document.
(sec.257-ssec.3) Subsection (1) does not require a person to seize or confiscate a document stored or displayed on a digital device if— the device is used in the contravention of section 255 ; and in contravening the section a person produced the device to display the following things, or an image or other design purporting to be the thing— a digital authority; a digital evidence of age; a digital evidence of identity.
- (a) a genuine document that is, for the purposes of this Act, acceptable evidence of age of the person specified in the document; or
- (b) a false document that could reasonably be taken, for the purposes of this Act, to be genuine acceptable evidence of age;
- (a) the device is used in the contravention of section 255 ; and
- (b) in contravening the section a person produced the device to display the following things, or an image or other design purporting to be the thing— (i) a digital authority; (ii) a digital evidence of age; (iii) a digital evidence of identity.
- (i) a digital authority;
- (ii) a digital evidence of age;
- (iii) a digital evidence of identity.
- (i) a digital authority;
- (ii) a digital evidence of age;
- (iii) a digital evidence of identity.