QLDIn ForceAct
Fisheries Act 1994
sec.174ARecovery of particular costs of investigation
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.174A
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Fisheries Act 1994.
### sec.174A Recovery of particular costs of investigation
This section applies if—
a court convicts a person of an offence against this Act; and
the chief executive applies to the court for an order against the person for the payment of particular costs incurred by the State for the investigation of the offence; and
the court finds the costs—
were not, and could not reasonably have been, expected to be incurred for the investigation of the offence; and
were reasonably incurred.
The court may order the person to pay the State an amount equal to the costs if it is satisfied it would be just to make the order in the circumstances of the particular case.
In deciding whether to make the order, the court must have regard to—
the extent to which the person’s conduct during the investigation contributed to the costs being incurred; and
whether the offence was committed, wholly or partly, for a commercial purpose; and
any other relevant matter.
This section does not limit the court’s powers under the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 or another law.
An application to a court under this section, and any order made by the court on the application, is a judgment in the court’s civil jurisdiction.
Any issue is to be decided on the balance of probabilities.
s 174A ins 2019 No. 6 s 20
(sec.174A-ssec.1) This section applies if— a court convicts a person of an offence against this Act; and the chief executive applies to the court for an order against the person for the payment of particular costs incurred by the State for the investigation of the offence; and the court finds the costs— were not, and could not reasonably have been, expected to be incurred for the investigation of the offence; and were reasonably incurred.
(sec.174A-ssec.2) The court may order the person to pay the State an amount equal to the costs if it is satisfied it would be just to make the order in the circumstances of the particular case.
(sec.174A-ssec.3) In deciding whether to make the order, the court must have regard to— the extent to which the person’s conduct during the investigation contributed to the costs being incurred; and whether the offence was committed, wholly or partly, for a commercial purpose; and any other relevant matter.
(sec.174A-ssec.4) This section does not limit the court’s powers under the Penalties and Sentences Act 1992 or another law.
(sec.174A-ssec.5) An application to a court under this section, and any order made by the court on the application, is a judgment in the court’s civil jurisdiction.
(sec.174A-ssec.6) Any issue is to be decided on the balance of probabilities.
- (a) a court convicts a person of an offence against this Act; and
- (b) the chief executive applies to the court for an order against the person for the payment of particular costs incurred by the State for the investigation of the offence; and
- (c) the court finds the costs— (i) were not, and could not reasonably have been, expected to be incurred for the investigation of the offence; and (ii) were reasonably incurred.
- (i) were not, and could not reasonably have been, expected to be incurred for the investigation of the offence; and
- (ii) were reasonably incurred.
- (i) were not, and could not reasonably have been, expected to be incurred for the investigation of the offence; and
- (ii) were reasonably incurred.
- (a) the extent to which the person’s conduct during the investigation contributed to the costs being incurred; and
- (b) whether the offence was committed, wholly or partly, for a commercial purpose; and
- (c) any other relevant matter.