66 Mr Price said that after negotiations with the Crown a fresh indictment was prepared, annexure D to the affidavit, with the Form 1, annexure E. He explained the Form 1, and its contents in the presence of Ms McGowan. The applicant agreed with the contents: Paragraphs [32] & [33]. The applicant pleaded guilty to the three counts in the fresh indictment, with the two additional offences placed on the Form 1. The Crown no billed the remainder from the original indictment. Agreed facts were sent to Mr Price by email, and at 9.30am on 24 April 2008 with Ms McGowan he saw the applicant in the cells. Changes were discussed, noted by Ms McGowan on the document, annexure F to the affidavit. The document also has changes tracked using the facility for that purpose in the computer software. The Crown prepared a fresh set of facts reflecting the majority of the changes, and about 12.30pm Mr Price had a further conference with the applicant with Ms McGowan present. Although he commented that the facts did not read well for him, he sought no further changes when Mr Price commented upon the difficulty reducing it further. He then signed the document, annexure G to the affidavit: Paragraphs [34] - [42]. Mr Price said that the applicant did not express reservations about pleading guilty in accordance the negotiations concluded on his behalf, and said that he consistently informed the applicant that these were serious matters likely to result in a substantial sentence: Paragraphs [43] & [44]. In his evidence the applicant repeated that he has always maintained his innocence, but believed that he would be convicted and wanted to get a deal. He was not told what a Form 1 was, and did not know of it from past experience. He agreed that he signed the facts, but said that this occurred in the dock. He could not recall if he was shown the document in the cells. He agreed that there was conversation in terms of that described by Mr Price, but added that Mr Price said he had spent all night trying to get the best agreed facts. He said that he did not know what the agreed facts were, but signed them because he asked for a deal and thought that this was how it unfolded. He did not think he would be getting sentenced on the agreed facts, but only on the charges.