(e) Although the police had been in the shed adjacent to the house during the course of the afternoon and had taken some photographs of the interior, Senior Constable Keightly had, during the course of the evening at about 10.30 p.m., returned to the shed to make a search of his own. Inside the shed and adjacent to the work bench were a number of cupboards. In the bottom of the left hand cupboard, and behind other material and a yellow box, he recovered a green jacket which was "rolled up" and appeared to have "stains" on it. He unravelled the jacket and found in one of its pockets a balaclava. He also found a plastic bag on a shelf above where he had found the jacket. That plastic bag contained black and white gloves and a number of condoms. Cruz later identified these items. She had told the applicant to take the condoms out of the bedroom in the house when a young child had come to stay. The gloves, she said, were used for gardening purposes. The stains on the jacket which had been recovered by Keightly were later analysed by a forensic biologist and found to be blood stains. Some of the stains were "contact stains" and others were "droplets". They were widely distributed over the jacket and the stains were subjected to DNA analysis by a forensic biologist, Mr. Hall. He prepared a "DNA chart" setting out his results on 14 of the stains. Most of them, he said, were blood stains emanating from the deceased, some were stains of the applicant's blood and others were a mixture of the two. With respect to those which were consistent with the DNA profile of the deceased, he expressed the opinion that the blood was 6.53 billion times more likely to have come from the deceased than any other female of the Victorian caucasian population.