The application
11 The applicant's application was filed on 6 November 2013. It seeks a determination of native title on behalf of the Woppaburra People over land and waters within the external boundaries of the claim area. An amended application was filed on 25 November 2014.
12 The respondents to the application are the State of Queensland, the Commonwealth of Australia, Livingstone Shire Council, Michael Robert Fikus, Francis Valentine Hayward, Ted Loveday, Gary Sikes, and Sojourn Properties Pty Ltd.
13 There are no overlapping or competing native title claims over the land and waters covered in this application. There are no approved determinations of native title that affect any part of the claim area.
14 All parties to the application have reached agreement that native title exists in the claim area, and as to the nature and extent of those native title rights and interests in relation to the claimed area. That agreement, made under s 87(1) of the NTA, was filed on 28 October 2021.
15 The evidence of connection filed in the Court by the applicant includes that of Frederick Saunders, Hendrick Van Issum, Julie Ann Blair, Nellie Ann Richards, Samala Cronin, Vanessa Kirk, Angela Leitch, Debbra Witteman, Gordon Barney and Nerark Morris. The evidence of members of the native title claim group about their traditional laws and customs and rights and responsibilities in respect to land and waters is of the highest importance: Sampi v Western Australia [2005] FCA 777 at [48].
16 The applicant also relies on reports of an expert anthropologist, Dr Kevin Mayo, as follows:
(1) Expert Anthropological Report dated 11 March 2019, filed on 15 March 2019.
(2) Supplementary Expert Anthropological Report dated 20 February 2020, filed on 21 February 2020.
17 The Woppaburra People are the descendants of one or more of the following persons:
(1) Yulowa "Weerobilling";
(2) Nellie "Ooroong-ooran";
(3) Oyster Maggie;
(4) Fanny Lohse/Singh.
18 The evidence filed by the applicant provides cogent evidence that the Woppaburra People have maintained a continuous presence on their country to the extent possible within the context of the decimation of the population and removal from traditional lands and waters. The evidence supports the claim that the traditional laws acknowledged and the customs observed by the Woppaburra People give them the right to possess, occupy, use and enjoy the land and waters in the claim area.
19 The anthropological reports detail the continued acknowledgement and observance by the Woppaburra People of a range of laws and customs in respect of language, cultural knowledge, totemic and spiritual beliefs, sites, dispute resolution, decision-making, bush tucker and medicines.
20 In his 2019 report, Dr Mayo states at paragraph 177:
…[T]he clear identification of Woppaburra families has continued within the context of removal and resettlement until the present day. It has been marked not only by knowledge of family lines but by recognition of themselves as "salt water people" from the Keppel Islands with a deep knowledge of and spiritual attachment to the sea; retention of values and behaviours related to kinship, communal sharing and reciprocity, respect for elders, and transmission of knowledge and skills; retention of aspects of language and naming; knowledge of creation stories and totems specifically related to the Keppel Islands; belief in ancestral spirits and ancestral attachment to the Keppel Islands; and an assertion of connectedness through activism and cultural practices. This set of understandings, beliefs, and practices held by contemporary Woppaburra people all intersect in their acknowledgement of ancestors in ancestral place. This has a deep continuity with traditional belief and traditional law and custom that defines the holders of rights and interests in unalienable lands and waters.
21 Dr Mayo further states at paragraph 295:
…[I]t is possible to clearly identify the Woppaburra descent groups. It is possible to clearly identify the area of the Woppaburra Native Title claim without overlap of other claims. The body of traditional laws and customs of the wider society that were operative at effective Sovereignty can be identified or inferred and these include identification of a land holding group. That the Woppaburra were the traditional holders of rights in interests in the lands and waters of the Keppel Islands is apparent from these communal laws and customs and they were, and still are, acknowledged by neighbouring groups. The contemporary claimants have asserted this connection for generations. This connection has been expressed and is still expressed through recognition of descent as the primary means of incorporation, maintenance of family connections through traditional behaviours and values; through language and naming practices; through the transmission of knowledge and skills in fishing and in close relation with coastal areas; through the retention of spiritual beliefs and stories, especially related to the Mugga Mugga as the Woppaburra totem, through spiritual beliefs that link ancestors to country and to future generations, and through active engagement with the process of reclaiming acknowledgement of Woppaburra connection to the Keppel Islands.