Determination
21 The Applicant submits that it is appropriate for the Court to exercise its discretion under section 87 to make an order in the terms of the Proposed Determination without holding a hearing having regard to the principles in Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People v State of Queensland [2001] FCA 1229; 115 FCR 109 for the following reasons:
(a) All parties have had the benefit of independent and competent legal advice and have freely entered into an agreement under section 87 of the Native Title Act relating to the Proposed Determination.
(b) It is consistent with objects in the Native Title Act that issues and disputes concerning native title are resolved by mediation.
(c) The State has taken a "real interest" in the proceeding on behalf of the community and given appropriate consideration to the Applicant's connection material.
(d) The material relied upon by the Applicant is capable of satisfying sections 47A and 47B of the Native Title Act and the respondent parties agree.
(e) The connection material filed by the Applicant satisfies section 223 of the Native Title Act and supports the making of the Proposed Determination.
(f) The requirements of sections 56, 94A and 225 of the Native Title Act are satisfied.
22 Section 87, so far as relevant, is as follows:
87 Power of Federal Court if parties reach agreement
Application
(1) This section applies if, at any stage of proceedings after the end of the period specified in the notice given under section 66:
(a) agreement is reached between the parties on the terms of an order of the Federal Court in relation to:
(i) the proceedings; or
(ii) a part of the proceedings; or
(iii) a matter arising out of the proceedings; and
(b) the terms of the agreement, in writing signed by or on behalf of the parties, are filed with the Court; and
(c) the Court is satisfied that an order in, or consistent with, those terms would be within the power of the Court.
Power of Court
(1A) The Court may, if it appears to the Court to be appropriate to do so, act in accordance with:
(a) whichever of subsection (2) or (3) is relevant in the particular case; and
(b) if subsection (5) applies in the particular case - that subsection.
Agreement as to order
(2) If the agreement is on the terms of an order of the Court in relation to the proceedings, the Court may make an order in, or consistent with, those terms without holding a hearing or, if a hearing has started, without completing the hearing.
Note: If the application involves making a determination of native title, the Court's order would need to comply with section 94A (which deals with the requirements of native title determination orders).
Agreement as to part of proceedings
(3) If the agreement relates to a part of the proceedings or a matter arising out of the proceedings, the Court may in its order give effect to the terms of the agreement without, if it has not already done so, dealing at the hearing with the part of the proceedings or the matter arising out of the proceedings, as the case may be, to which the agreement relates.
Orders about matters other than native title
(4) Without limiting subsection (2) or (3), if the order under that subsection does not involve the Court making a determination of native title, the order may give effect to terms of the agreement that involve matters other than native title.
(5) Without limiting subsection (2) or (3), if the order under that subsection involves the Court making a determination of native title, the Court may also make an order under this subsection that gives effect to terms of the agreement that involve matters other than native title.
(6) The jurisdiction conferred on the Court by this Act extends to:
(a) making an order under subsection (2) or (3) that gives effect to terms of the agreement that involve matters other than native title; and
(b) making an order under subsection (5).
(7) The regulations may specify the kinds of matters other than native title that an order under subsection (2), (3) or (5) may give effect to.
…
23 I find that the requirements of section 87 have been established.
24 In particular, section 87 applies because, first, after the end of the period specified in the notice given under section 66, agreement has been reached between the parties on the terms of an order of the Court in relation to the proceedings.
25 Secondly, the terms of the agreement, in writing signed by or on behalf of the parties, have been filed with the Court.
26 Thirdly, for the reasons which follow, I am satisfied that an order in, or consistent with, those terms is within the power of the Court.
27 As to the Court's power, first, the Application was validly made, having been authorised by the native title claimants according to a decision-making process agreed to and adopted in relation to authorising decisions of that kind, which authorised the Applicant to make the native title determination application, as required by section 251B of the Native Title Act.
28 Secondly, the Application seeks a determination of native title in relation to an area for which there is no approved determination of native title (section 13(1)(a) of the Native Title Act) and there remains no approved determination in relation to the area the subject of the Proposed Determination (section 68 of the Native Title Act).
29 Thirdly, there are no other proceedings before the Court relating to native title determination applications that cover any part of the area the subject of the Proposed Determination which would otherwise require orders to be made under section 67(1) of the Native Title Act.
30 Fourthly, the form of the Proposed Determination complies with sections 94A and 225 of the Native Title Act and the requirements of section 87 are otherwise satisfied.
31 I proceed under section 87(2), which is the section relevant in this particular case.
32 Turning to whether the order is appropriate within section 87(1A), the discretion under section 87 must be exercised judicially and within the subject matter, scope and purpose of the Native Title Act: Lota Warria (on behalf of the Poruma and Masig Peoples) v State of Queensland [2005] FCA 1117; 223 ALR 62 at [7] per Black CJ. This includes the resolution of disputes by agreement: Hughes (on behalf of the Eastern Guruma People) v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 365 at [8] per Bennett J.
33 The focus of the Court in considering whether the orders sought are appropriate is on the making of the agreement by the parties: Lander v State of South Australia [2012] FCA 427 at [11] per Mansfield J, citing with approval what had been said by North J in Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474 at [36]-[37].
34 In order to form a view as to whether the legal requirements for the recognition of native title have been met, the Court is not necessarily required to receive evidence or to embark on its own enquiry on the merits of the claim where the Court is satisfied that the parties have freely and on an informed basis come to an agreement: see Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People v State of Queensland [2001] FCA 1229; 115 FCR 109 at [30], Cox on behalf of the Yungngora People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 588 at [3] per French J, and Brown v Northern Territory [2015] FCA 1268 at [23] per Mansfield J.
35 The Applicant submits, and I am satisfied, that all parties have had the benefit of independent and competent legal advice and have freely and on an informed basis come to an agreement under section 87.
36 The State has taken "a real interest in the proceeding in the interests of the community generally": Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People at [29]. I accept that in so doing, the State (acting in the interests of the community generally, including the claimants), having regard to the requirements of the Native Title Act, and having made its assessment of the sufficiency of the evidence, has satisfied itself that the determination is justified in all the circumstances. I refer in this respect to Western Bundjalung People v Attorney General of New South Wales [2017] FCA 992 at [20], where Jagot J spoke of "ensuring prima facie cogent claims are resolved by agreement in a timely and fair manner, at a reasonable and proportionate cost to claimant groups" as being an important part of the public interest the State is intended to protect and promote.
37 I note that for those reasons, the Applicant has informed the Court that the Applicant considers the Proposed Determination to be within the power of the Court and that it would be appropriate that the Court make the Proposed Determination of native title.
38 In terms of section 223 of the Native Title Act, the Applicant submitted that it had demonstrated to the Court that the proposed orders were "rooted in reality" by providing the Court with the material that had been provided to the respondents, particularly the State, so as to inform the Court why the parties had agreed to compromise in the matter. The Applicant submitted the material needed to answer the following propositions:
(a) Do the Nywaigi People, as a society or community, presently observe and acknowledge traditional laws and customs that are normative rules that originate from a pre-sovereignty (in this case, prior to 26 January 1788) Nywaigi society or community?
(b) Do the Nywaigi People presently possess the native title in accordance with those traditional laws and customs?
(c) Taking account that some change to, or adaptation of, traditional law or custom or some interruption of enjoyment or exercise of native title rights or interests in the period between the Crown asserting sovereignty and the present will not necessarily be fatal to a native title claim, has the normative system of the Nywaigi People had a continuous existence and vitality since sovereignty?
(d) Are the rights and interests in the Proposed Determinations recognised by the common law of Australia?
39 The Applicant submitted that the material filed contained a substantial amount of evidence that cumulatively established (or established facts from which it was reasonable to infer) an affirmative answer to each of the propositions in [38(a)-(d)] above, that material being in the following categories:
(i) Identification of the native title Claim Group:
(a) Archaeological material
(b) Anthropological material
(c) Linguistic material
(d) The pre-sovereignty society and Nywaigi People
(e) Evidence from the Nywaigi group
(ii) Continuity of connection:
(a) Physical, cultural and spiritual connection
(b) Traditional concepts of ownership and responsibility
(c) Transmission of responsibilities
(d) Continuity of connection by Nywaigi People
(e) Continuity and transformation into the contemporary land tenure system
(f) Traditional law and customs substantially maintained
(iii) Normative system of traditional laws and customs
(iv) Rights and interests recognised by the Common Law of Australia
40 I accept the submissions on behalf of the Applicant that the material establishes the following. Aboriginal people who spoke a dialect of the Nywaigi language, known as the Nywaigi dialect, used and occupied Nywaigi country prior to 1788. There has been ongoing use of the Nywaigi dialect and acquisition and transfer of Nywaigi cultural knowledge throughout the twentieth century, from which I infer that the Nywaigi People today are descended from a community of people who spoke the Nywaigi dialect of the wider Nywaigi language and who used and occupied Nywaigi country prior to 1788. The material provides a basis for Nywaigi identity and links the Nywaigi People today to land and language through the application of normative rules associated with "dreaming stories". It identifies Nywaigi ancestors and locates them as a community of Nywaigi People in the early days of sustained European contact in Nywaigi country (from the 1870s). It links the Nywaigi People and establishes a basis for inferring that they are descended from a pre-sovereignty community of Nywaigi ancestors. It establishes the Nywaigi People today, and in 1900, as an organised society that possesses native title rights and interests in accordance with observed and acknowledged traditional laws and customs. The material also supports the intergenerational transfer of those laws and customs and I infer that they, as well as the rights possessed in accordance with them, have their origins in a pre-sovereignty Nywaigi society.
41 I also accept the submissions on behalf of the Applicant that the material establishes the continuity of the Nywaigi People as a society possessing native title in accordance with observed and acknowledged traditional law and custom, despite the impact of sustained European settlement in Ingham, the Victoria and Rollingstone Creeks and surrounding districts. While there have been some adaptations of laws and customs as a result of the impacts of sustained European settlement, those changes have not affected the laws and customs of the Nywaigi People such that it can still be said that the rights or interests asserted are possessed under their traditional laws acknowledged and the traditional customs observed. The established laws and customs also provide evidence that supports an inference, which I draw, that the established laws and customs, as well as the rights possessed in accordance with them, have their origins in a pre-sovereignty Nywaigi society.
42 I further accept the submissions on behalf of the Applicant that the material establishes that the rights and interests in the Proposed Determination are not antithetical to fundamental tenets of the common law and, subject to permissible adaptation, existed at sovereignty, survived that fundamental change in legal regime, and now can be enforced and protected. As such, they are recognised by the common law of Australia.
43 I find, in accordance with the submissions on behalf the Applicant, that, first, the connection material demonstrates that from first European contact (and thus from sovereignty) there were Indigenous people in the area now claimed as Nywaigi country. Secondly, the material also establishes the term Nywaigi is used to identify a name of a tribe and this tribe's language. In doing so members from 10 of the 12 known Nywaigi lineages also spoke of family identity, sub-family (branch) identity, and sub-tribal (clan) identity. Thirdly, the Nywaigi People demonstrate the continuity of their territoriality, that is, their traditional ownership of a contiguous tract of land and waters. Fourthly, Nywaigi society from generation to generation maintained its identity and existence, as well as its acknowledgement and observance of its Traditional Laws and Customs.
44 Section 94A states that an order in which the Court makes a determination of native title must set out details of the matters mentioned in section 225 (which defines determination of native title).
45 Section 225 is as follows:
225 Determination of native title
A determination of native title is a determination whether or not native title exists in relation to a particular area (the determination area) of land or waters and, if it does exist, a determination of:
(a) who the persons, or each group of persons, holding the common or group rights comprising the native title are; and
(b) the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the determination area; and
(c) the nature and extent of any other interests in relation to the determination area; and
(d) the relationship between the rights and interests in paragraphs (b) and (c) (taking into account the effect of this Act); and
(e) to the extent that the land or waters in the determination area are not covered by a non-exclusive agricultural lease or a non-exclusive pastoral lease - whether the native title rights and interests confer possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of that land or waters on the native title holders to the exclusion of all others.
Note: The determination may deal with the matters in paragraphs (c) and (d) by referring to a particular kind or particular kinds of non-native title interests.
46 The orders the Court makes today constitute such a determination. The description of the native title holders in Schedule 3 of the Proposed Determination satisfies the requirements of section 225(a). It provides a clear identification of the Nywaigi People as a group and the means by which Nywaigi People can be identified as native title holders through descent from identified ancestors, in accordance with the traditional laws and customs of the Nywaigi People. As to the requirements of section 225(b), the native title rights and interests are described in the Proposed Determination. Paragraph 8(b) of the Proposed Determination provides that the native title rights and interests are subject to, and exercisable in accordance with the traditional laws acknowledged, and traditional customs observed, by the native title holders. As to the requirements of section 225(e), the native title rights and interests are clearly described in paragraphs 6 and 7 of the Proposed Determination as "exclusive" or "non-exclusive". The Nywaigi People rely upon section 47A of the Act in relation to certain of the parcels listed as Exclusive Areas under Part 1 of Schedule IA of the Proposed Determination. In addition to areas to which section 47A applies, there are a number of other parcels described in the Proposed Determination as being Exclusive Areas. As to the requirements of sections 225(c) and (d), Paragraphs 11 and 12 of the Proposed Determination, together with Schedule 4 identify all other interests in relation to the Determination Area and establish that, to the extent that there is an inconsistency between those other interests and the determined native title, the other interests will prevail.
47 Section 55 of the Native Title Act provides that if the Court proposes to make an approved determination of native title and the determination is that native title exists at the time of making the determination, the Court must, at the same time as, or as soon as practicable after, it makes the determination, make such determinations as are required by sections 56 and 57. Section 57 is the relevant provision as the Nywaigi People have decided that the Corporation hold their native title "not as trustee" but as agent.
48 Section 57 provides, so far as relevant:
57 Determination of prescribed body corporate etc.
…
Where not trustee
(2) If the determination under section 56 is not as mentioned in subsection (1) of this section, the Federal Court must take the following steps in determining which prescribed body corporate is, after becoming a registered native title body corporate, to perform the functions mentioned in subsection (3):
(a) first, it must request a representative of the common law holders to:
(i) nominate, in writing given to the Federal Court within a specified period, a prescribed body corporate for the purpose; and
(ii) include with the nomination the written consent of the body corporate;
(b) secondly, if a prescribed body corporate is nominated in accordance with the request, the Federal Court must determine that the body is to perform the functions;
(c) thirdly, if no prescribed body corporate is nominated in accordance with the request, the Federal Court must, in accordance with the regulations, determine which prescribed body corporate is to perform the functions.
Functions where not trustee
(3) After becoming a registered native title body corporate, the body must perform:
(a) any functions given to it as a registered native title body corporate under particular provisions of this Act; and
(b) any functions given to it under the regulations (see section 58).
49 I am satisfied that the Corporation is a prescribed body corporate within section 57(2). The regulation is the Native Title (Prescribed Bodies Corporate) Regulations 1999 (Cth). Five conditions must be satisfied for a corporation to be determined as a prescribed body corporate.
50 It must be an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation (reg 4(1)). Here the Corporation was incorporated and is registered under the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Cth). It is taken to be registered for the purpose of being the subject of a section 56 or 57 determination for the reasons which follow.
51 The purpose of being a registered native title body corporate must be set out in the objects of the corporation (reg 4(2)(a)). The necessary objects are included in the Rules of the Corporation.
52 All members of the corporation must be persons who at the time of the determination are included, or are proposed to be included, in the native title determination as the native title holders (reg 4(2)(b)). The rules of the Corporation provide that membership is only open to natural persons over the age of 18 years and who fall within the definition of "Nywaigi People".
53 All members of the Corporation at the time of making the section 57 determination and at all times after the section 57 determination is made, are persons who have native title rights and interests in relation to the determination area (reg 4(2)(b) and (c)). Only those people who fall within the description of Nywaigi People as set out in the Rules, and mirrored in the definition of the common law holders in the Proposed Determination, will be persons eligible to be members, and thus, the Corporation will at all times, including post-determination, have members that have native title rights and interests in the area to which the determination relates.
54 The corporation must meet the Indigeneity requirement under section 29-5 of the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act. The rules of the Corporation provide that membership is confined to Aboriginal persons who fall within the description of Nywaigi People set out in the rules. The rules do not provide for any other class of persons to be members.
55 The written and executed document constituting the common law holders' nomination and the Corporation's consent forms part of the Applicant's material: see [12(p)] above.
56 I determine that the Corporation is to perform the functions mentioned in section 57(3).