© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2018] FCA 493
Federal Court of Australia
2018-04-20
Robertson J
Original judgment source is linked above.
Number of paragraphs: 58
Counsel for the Applicant: Ms C Thomson of the North Queensland Land Council Native Title Representative Body
Solicitor for the State of Queensland: Ms M Stinton of Crown Law
Solicitor for Hinchinbrook Shire Council and Townsville City Council: Gilkerson Legal
Solicitor for Ergon Energy Corporation Limited: Holding Redlich
Solicitor for Telstra Corporation Limited: Herbert Smith Freehills
Solicitor for Tim Fellows, Ted Loveday, Karen Quadrell, Matt Quadrell and David Swindells: Gore & Associates
Solicitor for Crystal Creek Hut Owners Association Inc: Wilson Ryan Grose Lawyers
Solicitor for Halifax Bay Recreation & Lifestyle Association Inc: Mr D Firth of Firth Lawyers
Catherine Maree Bornis, Suzanne Ellen Kettlewell, Allan Leslie West and Robert Henry West: Ms C Bornis and Ms D West
BETWEEN: ROBERTA LIGHTNING First Applicant JOHN ANDERSON Second Applicant GERALD BERRY (and others named in the Schedule) Third Applicant
AND: STATE OF QUEENSLAND First Respondent HINCHINBROOK SHIRE COUNCIL Second Respondent TOWNSVILLE CITY COUNCIL (and others named in the Schedule) Third Respondent
JUDGE: ROBERTSON J DATE OF ORDER: 20 APRIL 2018
BEING SATISFIED that an order in the terms set out below is within the power of the Court, and it appearing appropriate to the Court to do so, pursuant to section 87 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth): BY CONSENT THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
Schedule 1A - Description of Determination Area The determination area comprises all of the land and waters described in Parts 1 and 2 below, to the extent that they are within the external boundary described in Part 3 below, and depicted on the map contained in Schedule 1B, excluding the areas described in Schedule 2. To the extent of any inconsistency, the written description, including as set out in Parts 1, 2 and 3, prevails over the map contained in Schedule 1B. Part 1 - Exclusive Areas All of the land and waters described in the following table and depicted in dark blue on the map contained in Schedule 1B: Area Description Sheet No. Lot 335 on CWL838251 * 2 That part of Lot 123 on NPW597 excluding areas formerly described as: 2 . Portion 37 on CWL1476; . Portion 6 on CWL253; and . Portion 5 on CWL161 That part of Lot 59 on NPW935 that falls within the external boundary and lies adjacent to the southern boundary of former plan FTY1180 7, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 & 21 Lot 122 on CWL3371 13 & 14 Lot 21 on CWL304 10 That part of Lot 405 on CWL3542 excluding the area formerly described as R634 on CWL2191 1 Lot 96 on WG270 24 Lot 97 on WG270 24 Lot 102 on CWL1806 9 & 10 Lot 111 on AP20216 6 & 7 Lot 114 on CWL2255 6 & 7 Lot 116 on CWL2287 6 Lot 141 on SP257765 12 Lot 181 on AP15628 2 Lot 18 on AP11737 16 Lot 19 on AP11737 14 & 15 Lot 1 on AP13626 19 Lot 1 on AP13698 23 Lot 1 on AP15629 2 Lot 1 on AP15898 18 Lot 1 on AP15900 18 Lot 1 on AP4706 20 Lot 1 on AP5501 15 Lot 1 on AP7708 6 Lot 1 on USL39623 2, 3 & 4 Lot 20 on USL39317 14 & 15 Lot 21 on AP13626 17 & 19 Lot 21 on USL39628 2 Lot 24 on SP130995 17 & 18 Lot 251 on CWL1525 5 Lot 25 on USL39624 4 Lot 26 on AP7708 6 Lot 27 on USL42227 22 Lot 2 on AP13527 17 Lot 2 on AP15569 15 Lot 2 on AP15629 2 Lot 2 on AP15898 18 Lot 2 on AP15900 18 Lot 302 on CWL1525 5 Lot 303 on CWL1525 5 Lot 304 on CWL1525 5 Lot 305 on CWL1525 5 Lot 306 on CWL1525 5 Lot 30 on USL42225 24 Lot 32 on USL39628 2 Lot 349 on CWL2348 5 Lot 35 on USL39628 2 Lot 36 on USL39620 1 Lot 378 on CWL2858 1 Lot 37 on USL42228 17 Lot 3 on AP15629 2 Lot 3 on AP7708 6 Lot 3 on P83611 15 Lot 3 on USL42227 8 & 16 That part of Lot 42 on CWL666 excluding Lots F, G and H on AP19665 26, 27 & 28 Lot 46 on AP13626 17 & 19 Lot 479 on AP20196 6 & 7 Lot 47 on USL42230 20 That part of Lot 5 on AP22370 that falls within the external boundary 1 Lot 50 on USL42230 20 Lot 58 on USL42230 17 Lot 5 on USL39321 11 Lot 68 on USL39323 6 & 7 Lot 6 on USL39566 3 & 4 Lot 70 on USL39323 6 & 7 Lot 71 on USL39323 6 & 7 Lot 86 on USL42225 24 Lot 8 on USL39566 3 Lot 95 on AP15524 15 Lot 9 on CP902869 25 Lot 2 on RP741097 * 2 Lot 3 on RP741097 * 2 Lot 1 on SP113476 * 2 Lot 2 on SP113476 * 2 Lot 3 on SP113476 * 2 & 4 Lot 4 on SP113476 * 2 Lot 301 on CWL1525 5
Part 2 - Non-Exclusive Areas All of the land and waters described in the following table and depicted in light blue on the map contained in Schedule 1B: Area Description Sheet No. That part of Lot 123 on NPW597 formerly described as Portion 5 on CWL161 7 Lot 2 on AP19230 16, 17, 20 & 21 That part of Lot 59 on NPW935 that falls within the external boundary excluding the following areas: 7, 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 & 21 . the area that lies adjacent to the southern boundary of former plan FTY1180; . Former Portion 99 on CWL1687; . Former Lot 31 on CWL2458; . Former Lot 32 on CWL2464; . Former Lot 112 on CWL2462; and . Former Portion 38 on CWL352 Lot 394 on CWL3698 3 Lot 101 on CWL2028 12 Lot 106 on WG325 21 Lot 11 on A77414 3 Lot 11 on A7748 3 Lot 120 on CWL3246 7 & 8 Lot 125 on CWL2923 12 Lot 126 on CWL3516 13 & 14 Lot 15 on P8367 15 Lot 17 on P8366 15 Lot 18 on P8366 15 Lot 1 on A77414 3 Lot 1 on AP19230 17, 20 & 21 Lot 1 on CP902870 15 Lot 239 on CWL3400 1, 2 & 3 Lot 29 on SP120103 18 Lot 340 on CWL2296 3 Lot 34 on CWL352 9 & 10 Lot 34 on SP120103 18 Lot 35 on CWL3002 9 Lot 370 on CWL2758 3 That part of Lot 382 on SP136985 excluding the area subject to former trustee lease for Sportsfield and Recreation Purposes and further identified as Drawing Number 277-1 2, 3, 4 & 5 Lot 383 on CWL3014 3 That part of Lot 405 on CWL3542 formerly described as R634 on CWL2191 1 That part of Lot 4 on A7748 excluding areas formerly described as Allotments 1, 2 and 3 of Section 3 on A7742 3 & 4 Lot 501 on A7742 3 Lot 538 on CWL3509 3 & 4 Lot 539 on CWL3509 4 & 5 Lot 545 on CWL666 2, 6 & 28 Lot 88 on CP902870 15 Lot 90 on WG166 17 & 18 Lot 91 on WG183 23 Lot 94 on WG260 25 Lot 98 on CWL1634 12 Lot 98 on WG272 17 & 20 That part of Lot 268 on FTY1271 that falls within the external boundary 9 & 13 and, save for any waters forming part of a lot on plan in one of the tables referred to in Part 1 or Part 2 above, the waters within the external boundary described in Part 3 below
Part 3 - External Boundary Description This determination area covers all lands and waters within the external boundary described below: Commencing at the northernmost point of Lot 405 on CWL3542, being a point on the south eastern bank of Victoria Creek at its mouth, and extending generally southerly and generally south easterly along the High Water Mark (across the mouths of any waterways flowing into the Halifax Bay between the seaward extremities at High Water Mark of each of the opposite banks of each such waterway) to the centreline of Rollingstone Creek; then generally southerly along that centreline to Latitude 19.057024° South; then generally south westerly passing through the following peaks: Longitude ° East Latitude ° South Feature 146.378314 19.070882 146.363272 19.099027 146.372945 19.113140 Mt Halifax
Then southerly to a point on the northern boundary of Lot A on WG318 at Longitude 146.371809° East; then generally north westerly along the boundaries of that lot, Lot 59 on NPW935, Lot 11 on WG155 and southern boundary of Ewan/Mt Spec Road to the boundary of native title determination QUD85/2005 Gugu Badhun People #2 (QCD2012/002); then north easterly, generally northerly, generally easterly, again generally northerly and generally westerly along the boundaries of that determination to Jacobsen Track; then generally northerly along the eastern boundary of that track to a corner at Latitude 18.888853° South; then generally north westerly, generally northerly and generally westerly along a watershed, passing through the following coordinate points, to the source of Plumtree Creek at Longitude 146.058666° East, Latitude 18.866757° South: Longitude ° East Latitude ° South 146.078126 18.888084 146.077700 18.886434 146.076287 18.885043 146.074518 18.884230 146.073026 18.882198 146.073233 18.881117 146.072705 18.879263 146.072941 18.876300 146.073532 18.874735 146.074123 18.872498 146.073591 18.870206 146.075205 18.867622 146.073086 18.867425 146.070177 18.867386 146.068307 18.867425 146.067060 18.868212 146.065398 18.867700 146.063071 18.868959 146.061284 18.868605 146.059539 18.867583
Then generally north easterly along the centreline of that creek to Latitude 18.840700° South; then north easterly to the centreline of Frances Creek at Latitude 18.833670° South; then generally north easterly passing through the following coordinates: Longitude ° East Latitude ° South Feature 146.107159 18.818885 146.122582 18.804267 146.140302 18.788405 146.151674 18.771844 Mt Helen 146.159334 18.765702 146.168522 18.755128 146.180008 18.736778 146.193790 18.720295 146.209541 18.707543 146.214136 18.700079 146.218730 18.686394 146.222668 18.668045 146.226605 18.642853 146.230871 18.625126 146.239750 18.610794 Mt Cordelia 146.246421 18.610210 Mt Catherina
Then easterly to the centreline of Victoria Creek at Longitude 146.274197° East; then generally south easterly and generally north easterly along the centreline of that creek to its mouth; then south easterly back to the commencement point.
Data Reference and source Application boundary data compiled by National Native Title Tribunal based on data sourced from Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Qld. Native title determination QUD85/2005 Gugu Badhun People #2 (QCD2012/002) as determined by the Federal Court on 1 August 2012. Cadastre data sourced from Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Qld (1 August 2014). Rivers/Creeks, watershed and roads based on cadastre, else, derived from 100K topographic maps.
Reference datum Geographical coordinates have been provided by the NNTT Geospatial Services and are referenced to the Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994 (GDA94), in decimal degrees and are based on the spatial reference data acquired from the various custodians at the time.
Use of Coordinates Where coordinates are used within the description to represent cadastral or topographical boundaries or the intersection with such, they are intended as a guide only. As an outcome to the custodians of cadastral and topographic data continuously recalculating the geographic position of their data based on improved survey and data maintenance procedures, it is not possible to accurately define such a position other than by detailed ground survey.
Schedule 2 - AREAS NOT FORMING PART OF THE DETERMINATION AREA The following areas of land and waters are excluded from the Determination Area.
Schedule 3 - NATIVE TITLE HOLDERS
Schedule 4 - OTHER INTERESTS IN THE DETERMINATION AREA The nature and extent of the other interests in relation to the Determination Area are the following as they exist as at the date of the determination:
The land 1 The traditional country is lands and waters in and around Victoria Creek to the north and Rollingstone Creek to the south, west to the Paluma Ranges and east to the waters of Halifax Bay. Halifax Bay is to the north and west of the City of Townsville in the State of Queensland.
The people 2 The Application is made by Ms Roberta Lightning, Mr John Anderson, Mr Gerald Berry, Mr Victor Bligh, Mr Victor Cassady, Ms Bernice Dwyer, Mr Phil Rist, and Ms Vannessa Oui. 3 I have had the advantage of considering the detailed submissions filed on 29 March 2018 on behalf of the Applicant.
The proceedings in the Court 4 The Nywaigi People Application was originally filed on 10 April 2015 with a notification closing date under section 66 of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) of 11 November 2015. An amended Form 1 was filed on 1 September 2017 pursuant to orders made by the Court on 28 August 2017, including amendments to the claim group description. 5 The Application was notified by the Native Title Registrar under section 66 and the period of three months after the notification day referred to in subsections 66(8) and 66(10)(c) of the Native Title Act ended on 11 November 2015. 6 By the Application, the Applicant seeks a determination of native title under section 61 of the Native Title Act, on the Applicant's own behalf and on behalf of the Nywaigi People, over the lands and waters I have described above. 7 The State of Queensland, Hinchinbrook Shire Council, Townsville City Council, Telstra Corporation Limited, Ergon Energy Corporation Limited and various permit holders and people with fishing interests are parties to the Application. 8 All parties to the Application have reached agreement that native title exists and in regard to the nature and extent of those native title rights and interests over the areas covered by the Application (the "Determination Area"). The agreement, made under section 87(2) of the Native Title Act, was filed on 6 April 2018. 9 Details of the Application were entered onto the Register of Native Title Claims on 5 June 2015. 10 The Registrar was satisfied that the Amended Application addressed the criteria of the registration test and the Application remains on the Register of Native Title Claims. 11 The external boundaries of the Determination Area are described in Schedule 1 to the Minute of Proposed Consent Determination of Native Title filed in the Court on 4 April 2018.
Claimants' connection to the claim area 12 As to the assessment of connection materials and connection to country of the native title claimants, the Applicant provided the State and the other Respondents with the following connection material in support of the claimants' connection to the claim area: (a) Affidavit of Phil Rist sworn 1 April 2015 and filed with the Form 1 application 10 April 2015. (b) Affidavit of Carol Berry sworn 20 April 2016 and filed 21 April 2016. (c) Affidavit of Allan (Bodie) Berry sworn 20 April 2016 and filed 21 April 2016. (d) Affidavit of Henry Dennis sworn 3 September 2015 and filed 21 April 2016. (e) Affidavit of Victor Bligh sworn 19 January 2017 and filed 21 April 2016. (f) Affidavit of Henry Dennis sworn 21 April 2016 and filed the same day. (g) Affidavit of Henry Dennis sworn 17 January and filed 24 January 2017. (h) Affidavit of Phillip Rist sworn 23 January 2017 and filed 24 January 2017. (i) Affidavit of Carol Berry sworn 24 January 2017 and filed the same day. (j) Affidavit of Cedric Cassady sworn 23 January 2017 and filed 24 January 2017. (k) Affidavit of Cynthia Payne sworn 25 January 2017 and filed 27 January 2017. (l) Affidavit of Rosalind Dawn Glass sworn 17 July 2017 and filed 1 September 2017 under attachment T of the Amended the Form 1. (m) Mr Daniel Leo, Native Title Connection Report for the Nywaigi People, Girringun Regional Society, North Queensland ('Leo 2016') and filed 27 March 2018. (n) Mr Daniel Leo, Addendum regarding the name of the Regional Society that can be termed 'Southern Rainforest' or 'Girringun' ('Leo 2018') and filed 27 March 2018. (o) Mr Daniel Leo, Amended Addendum regarding Adoption within the Southern Rainforest (Girringun) Regional Society and filed 28 March 2018. (p) Nomination and Consent of Warga Badda Nywaigi Aboriginal Corporation (the Corporation) PBC ICN 8690, filed 22 March 2018.
Authorisation by Claim Group members 13 I have read the affidavits which depose to the attendance by members of the Nywaigi People at an authorisation meeting on 18 December 2014, organised by the North Queensland Land Council Native Title Representative Body (the NQLC). 14 Those affidavits were made by Ms Roberta Lightning, dated 19 January 2015, Mr Phillip Rist, dated 1 April 2015, Mr Victor Cassady, dated 19 January 2015, Mr Victor Bligh, dated 19 January 2015, Mr John Anderson, dated 30 January 2015, Mr Gerald Berry, dated 14 January 2015 and Ms Evelyn Noble, dated 16 January 2015. 15 I am satisfied that proper notice was given of the meeting both by correspondence sent by the NQLC and by public notice. I note the unanimous resolution of the attendees that sufficient notice was given of the meeting for decisions to be made about matters on the agenda; that the meeting was sufficiently representative of members of the Nywaigi claim group to make decisions about matters at the meeting; that the meeting was sufficiently representative of the Nywaigi People to authorise persons to be the applicant; and that the decision-making process followed by the persons attending the meeting was to be: By consensus, the decision-making process will be that the Nywaigi People will break into their family groups. Each family will make the decision on the resolution and appoint a spokesperson to announce their decision. The majority of the families present will decide the resolution or issue. 16 I am satisfied that all decisions at the authorisation meeting were made in accordance with this process. I am also satisfied that in accordance with the decisions made at the authorisation meeting, the NQLC was instructed to take the necessary steps to assist the applicant to file the claim with the Court. 17 I have read the affidavit sworn 29 March 2018 by Cheryl Ann Thomson, a solicitor employed by the NQLC and the solicitor on the record for this native title determination application. 18 Ms Thomson deposes, and I accept, that the Corporation remains an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation. All of the members of the Corporation can be demonstrated to be Nywaigi People as described in Schedule 3 of the Proposed Determination that is part of the Agreement under section 87(2) of the Native Title Act filed by the State on 6 April 2018. The description of 'Nywaigi People' within the Corporation's Rules coincides with that of the Native Title Holders described in Schedule 3 of the Proposed Determination. 19 I find that the Applicant is authorised to consent to the Court making a determination in or consistent with the terms of the Determination. 20 The signatures are those of, or for, the NQLC, the State of Queensland, the Hinchinbrook Shire Council and Townsville City Council, Ergon Energy Corporation Limited, Telstra Corporation Limited, Tim Fellows, Ted Loveday, Karen Quadrell, Matt Quadrell, David Swindells, Crystal Creek Hut Owners Association, Halifax Bay Recreation & Lifestyle Association Inc, Catherine Maree Bornis, Suzanne Ellen Kettlewell, Allan Leslie West and Robert Henry West.
Determination 21 The Applicant submits that it is appropriate for the Court to exercise its discretion under section 87 to make an order in the terms of the Proposed Determination without holding a hearing having regard to the principles in Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People v State of Queensland [2001] FCA 1229; 115 FCR 109 for the following reasons: (a) All parties have had the benefit of independent and competent legal advice and have freely entered into an agreement under section 87 of the Native Title Act relating to the Proposed Determination. (b) It is consistent with objects in the Native Title Act that issues and disputes concerning native title are resolved by mediation. (c) The State has taken a "real interest" in the proceeding on behalf of the community and given appropriate consideration to the Applicant's connection material. (d) The material relied upon by the Applicant is capable of satisfying sections 47A and 47B of the Native Title Act and the respondent parties agree. (e) The connection material filed by the Applicant satisfies section 223 of the Native Title Act and supports the making of the Proposed Determination. (f) The requirements of sections 56, 94A and 225 of the Native Title Act are satisfied. 22 Section 87, so far as relevant, is as follows: 87 Power of Federal Court if parties reach agreement Application (1) This section applies if, at any stage of proceedings after the end of the period specified in the notice given under section 66: (a) agreement is reached between the parties on the terms of an order of the Federal Court in relation to: (i) the proceedings; or (ii) a part of the proceedings; or (iii) a matter arising out of the proceedings; and (b) the terms of the agreement, in writing signed by or on behalf of the parties, are filed with the Court; and (c) the Court is satisfied that an order in, or consistent with, those terms would be within the power of the Court. Power of Court (1A) The Court may, if it appears to the Court to be appropriate to do so, act in accordance with: (a) whichever of subsection (2) or (3) is relevant in the particular case; and (b) if subsection (5) applies in the particular case - that subsection. Agreement as to order (2) If the agreement is on the terms of an order of the Court in relation to the proceedings, the Court may make an order in, or consistent with, those terms without holding a hearing or, if a hearing has started, without completing the hearing. Note: If the application involves making a determination of native title, the Court's order would need to comply with section 94A (which deals with the requirements of native title determination orders). Agreement as to part of proceedings (3) If the agreement relates to a part of the proceedings or a matter arising out of the proceedings, the Court may in its order give effect to the terms of the agreement without, if it has not already done so, dealing at the hearing with the part of the proceedings or the matter arising out of the proceedings, as the case may be, to which the agreement relates. Orders about matters other than native title (4) Without limiting subsection (2) or (3), if the order under that subsection does not involve the Court making a determination of native title, the order may give effect to terms of the agreement that involve matters other than native title. (5) Without limiting subsection (2) or (3), if the order under that subsection involves the Court making a determination of native title, the Court may also make an order under this subsection that gives effect to terms of the agreement that involve matters other than native title. (6) The jurisdiction conferred on the Court by this Act extends to: (a) making an order under subsection (2) or (3) that gives effect to terms of the agreement that involve matters other than native title; and (b) making an order under subsection (5). (7) The regulations may specify the kinds of matters other than native title that an order under subsection (2), (3) or (5) may give effect to. … 23 I find that the requirements of section 87 have been established. 24 In particular, section 87 applies because, first, after the end of the period specified in the notice given under section 66, agreement has been reached between the parties on the terms of an order of the Court in relation to the proceedings. 25 Secondly, the terms of the agreement, in writing signed by or on behalf of the parties, have been filed with the Court. 26 Thirdly, for the reasons which follow, I am satisfied that an order in, or consistent with, those terms is within the power of the Court. 27 As to the Court's power, first, the Application was validly made, having been authorised by the native title claimants according to a decision-making process agreed to and adopted in relation to authorising decisions of that kind, which authorised the Applicant to make the native title determination application, as required by section 251B of the Native Title Act. 28 Secondly, the Application seeks a determination of native title in relation to an area for which there is no approved determination of native title (section 13(1)(a) of the Native Title Act) and there remains no approved determination in relation to the area the subject of the Proposed Determination (section 68 of the Native Title Act). 29 Thirdly, there are no other proceedings before the Court relating to native title determination applications that cover any part of the area the subject of the Proposed Determination which would otherwise require orders to be made under section 67(1) of the Native Title Act. 30 Fourthly, the form of the Proposed Determination complies with sections 94A and 225 of the Native Title Act and the requirements of section 87 are otherwise satisfied. 31 I proceed under section 87(2), which is the section relevant in this particular case. 32 Turning to whether the order is appropriate within section 87(1A), the discretion under section 87 must be exercised judicially and within the subject matter, scope and purpose of the Native Title Act: Lota Warria (on behalf of the Poruma and Masig Peoples) v State of Queensland [2005] FCA 1117; 223 ALR 62 at [7] per Black CJ. This includes the resolution of disputes by agreement: Hughes (on behalf of the Eastern Guruma People) v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 365 at [8] per Bennett J. 33 The focus of the Court in considering whether the orders sought are appropriate is on the making of the agreement by the parties: Lander v State of South Australia [2012] FCA 427 at [11] per Mansfield J, citing with approval what had been said by North J in Lovett on behalf of the Gunditjmara People v State of Victoria [2007] FCA 474 at [36]-[37]. 34 In order to form a view as to whether the legal requirements for the recognition of native title have been met, the Court is not necessarily required to receive evidence or to embark on its own enquiry on the merits of the claim where the Court is satisfied that the parties have freely and on an informed basis come to an agreement: see Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People v State of Queensland [2001] FCA 1229; 115 FCR 109 at [30], Cox on behalf of the Yungngora People v State of Western Australia [2007] FCA 588 at [3] per French J, and Brown v Northern Territory [2015] FCA 1268 at [23] per Mansfield J. 35 The Applicant submits, and I am satisfied, that all parties have had the benefit of independent and competent legal advice and have freely and on an informed basis come to an agreement under section 87. 36 The State has taken "a real interest in the proceeding in the interests of the community generally": Munn for and on behalf of the Gunggari People at [29]. I accept that in so doing, the State (acting in the interests of the community generally, including the claimants), having regard to the requirements of the Native Title Act, and having made its assessment of the sufficiency of the evidence, has satisfied itself that the determination is justified in all the circumstances. I refer in this respect to Western Bundjalung People v Attorney General of New South Wales [2017] FCA 992 at [20], where Jagot J spoke of "ensuring prima facie cogent claims are resolved by agreement in a timely and fair manner, at a reasonable and proportionate cost to claimant groups" as being an important part of the public interest the State is intended to protect and promote. 37 I note that for those reasons, the Applicant has informed the Court that the Applicant considers the Proposed Determination to be within the power of the Court and that it would be appropriate that the Court make the Proposed Determination of native title. 38 In terms of section 223 of the Native Title Act, the Applicant submitted that it had demonstrated to the Court that the proposed orders were "rooted in reality" by providing the Court with the material that had been provided to the respondents, particularly the State, so as to inform the Court why the parties had agreed to compromise in the matter. The Applicant submitted the material needed to answer the following propositions: (a) Do the Nywaigi People, as a society or community, presently observe and acknowledge traditional laws and customs that are normative rules that originate from a pre-sovereignty (in this case, prior to 26 January 1788) Nywaigi society or community? (b) Do the Nywaigi People presently possess the native title in accordance with those traditional laws and customs? (c) Taking account that some change to, or adaptation of, traditional law or custom or some interruption of enjoyment or exercise of native title rights or interests in the period between the Crown asserting sovereignty and the present will not necessarily be fatal to a native title claim, has the normative system of the Nywaigi People had a continuous existence and vitality since sovereignty? (d) Are the rights and interests in the Proposed Determinations recognised by the common law of Australia? 39 The Applicant submitted that the material filed contained a substantial amount of evidence that cumulatively established (or established facts from which it was reasonable to infer) an affirmative answer to each of the propositions in [38(a)-(d)] above, that material being in the following categories: (i) Identification of the native title Claim Group: (a) Archaeological material (b) Anthropological material (c) Linguistic material (d) The pre-sovereignty society and Nywaigi People (e) Evidence from the Nywaigi group (ii) Continuity of connection: (a) Physical, cultural and spiritual connection (b) Traditional concepts of ownership and responsibility (c) Transmission of responsibilities (d) Continuity of connection by Nywaigi People (e) Continuity and transformation into the contemporary land tenure system (f) Traditional law and customs substantially maintained (iii) Normative system of traditional laws and customs (iv) Rights and interests recognised by the Common Law of Australia 40 I accept the submissions on behalf of the Applicant that the material establishes the following. Aboriginal people who spoke a dialect of the Nywaigi language, known as the Nywaigi dialect, used and occupied Nywaigi country prior to 1788. There has been ongoing use of the Nywaigi dialect and acquisition and transfer of Nywaigi cultural knowledge throughout the twentieth century, from which I infer that the Nywaigi People today are descended from a community of people who spoke the Nywaigi dialect of the wider Nywaigi language and who used and occupied Nywaigi country prior to 1788. The material provides a basis for Nywaigi identity and links the Nywaigi People today to land and language through the application of normative rules associated with "dreaming stories". It identifies Nywaigi ancestors and locates them as a community of Nywaigi People in the early days of sustained European contact in Nywaigi country (from the 1870s). It links the Nywaigi People and establishes a basis for inferring that they are descended from a pre-sovereignty community of Nywaigi ancestors. It establishes the Nywaigi People today, and in 1900, as an organised society that possesses native title rights and interests in accordance with observed and acknowledged traditional laws and customs. The material also supports the intergenerational transfer of those laws and customs and I infer that they, as well as the rights possessed in accordance with them, have their origins in a pre-sovereignty Nywaigi society. 41 I also accept the submissions on behalf of the Applicant that the material establishes the continuity of the Nywaigi People as a society possessing native title in accordance with observed and acknowledged traditional law and custom, despite the impact of sustained European settlement in Ingham, the Victoria and Rollingstone Creeks and surrounding districts. While there have been some adaptations of laws and customs as a result of the impacts of sustained European settlement, those changes have not affected the laws and customs of the Nywaigi People such that it can still be said that the rights or interests asserted are possessed under their traditional laws acknowledged and the traditional customs observed. The established laws and customs also provide evidence that supports an inference, which I draw, that the established laws and customs, as well as the rights possessed in accordance with them, have their origins in a pre-sovereignty Nywaigi society. 42 I further accept the submissions on behalf of the Applicant that the material establishes that the rights and interests in the Proposed Determination are not antithetical to fundamental tenets of the common law and, subject to permissible adaptation, existed at sovereignty, survived that fundamental change in legal regime, and now can be enforced and protected. As such, they are recognised by the common law of Australia. 43 I find, in accordance with the submissions on behalf the Applicant, that, first, the connection material demonstrates that from first European contact (and thus from sovereignty) there were Indigenous people in the area now claimed as Nywaigi country. Secondly, the material also establishes the term Nywaigi is used to identify a name of a tribe and this tribe's language. In doing so members from 10 of the 12 known Nywaigi lineages also spoke of family identity, sub-family (branch) identity, and sub-tribal (clan) identity. Thirdly, the Nywaigi People demonstrate the continuity of their territoriality, that is, their traditional ownership of a contiguous tract of land and waters. Fourthly, Nywaigi society from generation to generation maintained its identity and existence, as well as its acknowledgement and observance of its Traditional Laws and Customs. 44 Section 94A states that an order in which the Court makes a determination of native title must set out details of the matters mentioned in section 225 (which defines determination of native title). 45 Section 225 is as follows: 225 Determination of native title A determination of native title is a determination whether or not native title exists in relation to a particular area (the determination area) of land or waters and, if it does exist, a determination of: (a) who the persons, or each group of persons, holding the common or group rights comprising the native title are; and (b) the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the determination area; and (c) the nature and extent of any other interests in relation to the determination area; and (d) the relationship between the rights and interests in paragraphs (b) and (c) (taking into account the effect of this Act); and (e) to the extent that the land or waters in the determination area are not covered by a non-exclusive agricultural lease or a non-exclusive pastoral lease - whether the native title rights and interests confer possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of that land or waters on the native title holders to the exclusion of all others. Note: The determination may deal with the matters in paragraphs (c) and (d) by referring to a particular kind or particular kinds of non-native title interests. 46 The orders the Court makes today constitute such a determination. The description of the native title holders in Schedule 3 of the Proposed Determination satisfies the requirements of section 225(a). It provides a clear identification of the Nywaigi People as a group and the means by which Nywaigi People can be identified as native title holders through descent from identified ancestors, in accordance with the traditional laws and customs of the Nywaigi People. As to the requirements of section 225(b), the native title rights and interests are described in the Proposed Determination. Paragraph 8(b) of the Proposed Determination provides that the native title rights and interests are subject to, and exercisable in accordance with the traditional laws acknowledged, and traditional customs observed, by the native title holders. As to the requirements of section 225(e), the native title rights and interests are clearly described in paragraphs 6 and 7 of the Proposed Determination as "exclusive" or "non-exclusive". The Nywaigi People rely upon section 47A of the Act in relation to certain of the parcels listed as Exclusive Areas under Part 1 of Schedule IA of the Proposed Determination. In addition to areas to which section 47A applies, there are a number of other parcels described in the Proposed Determination as being Exclusive Areas. As to the requirements of sections 225(c) and (d), Paragraphs 11 and 12 of the Proposed Determination, together with Schedule 4 identify all other interests in relation to the Determination Area and establish that, to the extent that there is an inconsistency between those other interests and the determined native title, the other interests will prevail. 47 Section 55 of the Native Title Act provides that if the Court proposes to make an approved determination of native title and the determination is that native title exists at the time of making the determination, the Court must, at the same time as, or as soon as practicable after, it makes the determination, make such determinations as are required by sections 56 and 57. Section 57 is the relevant provision as the Nywaigi People have decided that the Corporation hold their native title "not as trustee" but as agent. 48 Section 57 provides, so far as relevant: 57 Determination of prescribed body corporate etc. … Where not trustee (2) If the determination under section 56 is not as mentioned in subsection (1) of this section, the Federal Court must take the following steps in determining which prescribed body corporate is, after becoming a registered native title body corporate, to perform the functions mentioned in subsection (3): (a) first, it must request a representative of the common law holders to: (i) nominate, in writing given to the Federal Court within a specified period, a prescribed body corporate for the purpose; and (ii) include with the nomination the written consent of the body corporate; (b) secondly, if a prescribed body corporate is nominated in accordance with the request, the Federal Court must determine that the body is to perform the functions; (c) thirdly, if no prescribed body corporate is nominated in accordance with the request, the Federal Court must, in accordance with the regulations, determine which prescribed body corporate is to perform the functions. Functions where not trustee (3) After becoming a registered native title body corporate, the body must perform: (a) any functions given to it as a registered native title body corporate under particular provisions of this Act; and (b) any functions given to it under the regulations (see section 58). 49 I am satisfied that the Corporation is a prescribed body corporate within section 57(2). The regulation is the Native Title (Prescribed Bodies Corporate) Regulations 1999 (Cth). Five conditions must be satisfied for a corporation to be determined as a prescribed body corporate. 50 It must be an Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander corporation (reg 4(1)). Here the Corporation was incorporated and is registered under the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act 2006 (Cth). It is taken to be registered for the purpose of being the subject of a section 56 or 57 determination for the reasons which follow. 51 The purpose of being a registered native title body corporate must be set out in the objects of the corporation (reg 4(2)(a)). The necessary objects are included in the Rules of the Corporation. 52 All members of the corporation must be persons who at the time of the determination are included, or are proposed to be included, in the native title determination as the native title holders (reg 4(2)(b)). The rules of the Corporation provide that membership is only open to natural persons over the age of 18 years and who fall within the definition of "Nywaigi People". 53 All members of the Corporation at the time of making the section 57 determination and at all times after the section 57 determination is made, are persons who have native title rights and interests in relation to the determination area (reg 4(2)(b) and (c)). Only those people who fall within the description of Nywaigi People as set out in the Rules, and mirrored in the definition of the common law holders in the Proposed Determination, will be persons eligible to be members, and thus, the Corporation will at all times, including post-determination, have members that have native title rights and interests in the area to which the determination relates. 54 The corporation must meet the Indigeneity requirement under section 29-5 of the Corporations (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander) Act. The rules of the Corporation provide that membership is confined to Aboriginal persons who fall within the description of Nywaigi People set out in the rules. The rules do not provide for any other class of persons to be members. 55 The written and executed document constituting the common law holders' nomination and the Corporation's consent forms part of the Applicant's material: see [12(p)] above. 56 I determine that the Corporation is to perform the functions mentioned in section 57(3).
Conclusion and orders 57 Today, the Court makes orders by consent which recognise that the native title claimants have, and always have had, native title rights and interests in land and waters within the area the subject of the Application. 58 The Court congratulates the parties in this proceeding for having finalised proposed orders by consent. I certify that the preceding fifty-eight (58) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Robertson.
SCHEDULE OF PARTIES QUD 148 of 2015 Applicants Fourth Applicant: VICTOR BLIGH Fifth Applicant: VICTOR CASSADY Sixth Applicant: BERNICE DWYER Seventh Applicant: PHIL RIST Eighth Applicant: VANESSA OUI Respondents Fourth Respondent: ERGON ENERGY CORPORATION LIMITED Fifth Respondent: TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED CAN 051 775 556 Sixth Respondent: CATHERINE MAREE BORNIS Seventh Respondent: CRYSTAL CREEK HUT OWNERS ASSOCIATION Eighth Respondent: HALIFAX BAY RECREATION & LIFESTYLE ASSOCIATION INC. Ninth Respondent: SUZANNE ELLEN KETTLEWELL Tenth Respondent: ALLAN LESLIE WEST Eleventh Respondent: ROBERT HENRY WEST Twelfth Respondent: TIM FELLOWS Thirteenth Respondent: TED LOVEDAY Fourteenth Respondent: KAREN QUADRELL Fifteenth Respondent: MATT QUADRELL Sixteenth Respondent: DAVID SWINDELLS
Lightning on behalf of the Nywaigi People
State of Queensland