© 2026 Zoe. All rights reserved.
Zoe is a legal information platform. Always consult the Federal Register of Legislation for authoritative text.
[2016] FCA 1447
Federal Court of Australia
2016-12-01
Ms J, Mr J, Reeves J
Original judgment source is linked above.
BEING SATISFIED that an order in the terms set out below is within the power of the Court, and it appearing appropriate to the Court to do so, pursuant to s 87A of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth), BY CONSENT THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
Part 2 -- Non-Exclusive Areas Save for any waters forming part of a lot on a plan, all waterways, natural lakes, creeks and rivers within the external boundary described in Part 3 - External Boundary Description. All of the land and waters described in the following table and depicted in light blue on the Determination map: Area Description (at date of Description) Sheet No. That part of Lot 154 on Plan FTY1972 excluding the areas formerly described as Portion 8 on DY400 and Portion 3 on DY381 12, 13 That part of Lot 168 on Plan FTY1337 excluding the area formerly described as Closed Road on FTY1254 (currently described as part of Lot 168 on FTY1337) 14 That part of Lot 216 on Plan SP142106 excluding the area formerly described as Area to be Added between stations 2-3-5-9-10-11-12-13-14-2 on SP142106 25 Part of Lot 227 on Plan NPW89 excluding the southern portion identified on Plan NPW89 as 'Closed Road' 14 That part of Lot 236 on Plan SP192344 excluding the area formerly described as Road Closed between stations I-F-E-D-C-N-M-L-K-J-I on MH839259 23 That part of Lot 265 on Plan SP126298 excluding the area formerly described as Area to be Added between stations A-B-C-D-A on SP126298 22 That part of Lot 37 on Plan MH878 excluding the area formerly described as Portion 26 on MH309 20 That part of Lot 41 on Plan MH778 excluding the area formerly described as Portion 46 on MH234 16 That part of Lot 48 on Plan FTY1383 excluding the area formerly described as Portion 5V on CVN79 28 That part of Lot 5 on Plan MH867 excluding the area formerly described as Closed Road between stations 18-20-21-23 on Plan MH867 23 That part of Lot 51 on Plan SP188020 excluding the area formerly described as Lot 47 on PG432 6, 9 Lot 1 on Plan AP13826 18 Lot 1 on Plan CVN131 28 Lot 1 on Plan F6903 2, 4 Lot 1 on Plan G47101 23 Lot 1 on Plan Y56914 16 Lot 1 on Plan SP157031 23 Lot 1 on Plan Y5698 16 Lot 1 on Plan SP227663 2, 4 Lot 1 on Plan CP883123 23 Lot 2 on Plan DY233 6 Lot 2 on Plan Y56916 16 Lot 2 on Plan SP227663 2, 4 Lot 2 on Plan G4791 23 Lot 2 on Plan T5865 29 Lot 3 on Plan CVN300 31 Lot 3 on Plan G4771 22 Lot 3 on Plan SP142104 12 Lot 3 on Plan CVN238 28 Lot 4 on Plan DY662 11 Lot 4 on Plan PG170 6 Lot 4 on Plan CVN138 28 Lot 5 on Plan BLM722 3 Lot 5 on Plan PG266 6 Lot 6 on Plan CVN415 31 Lot 6 on Plan PG468 2 Lot 6 on Plan PG474 14 Lot 7 on Plan CVN302 32 Lot 7 on Plan MH853 23 Lot 8 on Plan PG205 2 Lot 8 on Plan PG208 6 Lot 9 on Plan CVN100 29 Pt Lot 9 on Plan BLM68 35 Lot 10 on Plan CVN434 29 Lot 11 on Plan CVN9 28 Lot 11 on Plan DY229 11 Lot 12 on Plan CVN9 28 Lot 12 on Plan DY1073 6 Lot 13 on Plan CVN240 31 Lot 13 on Plan PG342 6 Lot 13 on Plan PG359 6 Lot 14 on Plan MH449 14 Lot 14 on Plan BLM604 1 Lot 14 on Plan CVN323 31 Lot 15 on Plan CVN301 31 Lot 15 on Plan DY166 11 Lot 15 on Plan G4770 22 Lot 16 on Plan MH890 14 Lot 16 on Plan DY233 6 Lot 16 on Plan MH288 16 Lot 16 on Plan G4770 22 Lot 16 on Plan PG380 8 Lot 16 on Plan MH827 14 Lot 17 on Plan MH565 14 Lot 17 on Plan PG143 8 Lot 17 on Plan G4770 22 Lot 17 on Plan BLM680 1 Lot 17 on Plan SP229053 31 Pt Lot 18 on Plan BLM80 1 Lot 18 on Plan MH838 23 Lot 19 on Plan CAR3449 31 Lot 19 on Plan CVN191 27 Lot 19 on Plan CVN812605 33 Lot 20 on Plan CVN341 28 Lot 20 on Plan CVN291 29 Lot 20 on Plan CP888665 23 Lot 20 on Plan MH805184 25 Lot 21 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 21 on Plan CVN305 29 Lot 21 on Plan MH337 16 Lot 22 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 22 on Plan PG167 6 Lot 22 on Plan CVN426 25 Lot 22 on Plan PG318 14 Lot 23 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 23 on Plan CVN2 28 Lot 24 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 24 on Plan PG389 11 Lot 25 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 25 on Plan CVN283 28 Lot 25 on Plan SP205944 25 Lot 26 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 26 on Plan T5861 29 Lot 26 on Plan PG168 11 Lot 27 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 27 on Plan CVN277 28 Lot 27 on Plan MH459 20 Lot 28 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 28 on Plan PG281 4 Lot 28 on Plan SP265895 28 Lot 28 on Plan MH43 17 Lot 29 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 30 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 31 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 32 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 32 on Plan PG459 5 Lot 32 on Plan CVN97 27 Lot 33 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 34 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 34 on Plan CVN255 27 Lot 35 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 35 on Plan CVN239 33 Lot 35 on Plan CVN255 27 Lot 36 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 36 on Plan CVN253 28 Lot 37 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 38 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 38 on Plan CAR347 27 Lot 38 on Plan MH728 20 Lot 39 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 39 on Plan PG459 5 Pt Lot 39 on Plan DY516 11 Lot 39 on Plan BLM140 2 Lot 40 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 40 on Plan PG466 2 Lot 40 on Plan BLM785 2 Lot 41 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 41 on Plan FTY296 2 Lot 42 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 42 on Plan PG321 7 Lot 42 on Plan MH585 22 Lot 43 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 43 on Plan PG18 2 Lot 43 on Plan MA3437 21 Lot 44 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 45 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 46 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 46 on Plan PG82 2 Lot 47 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 48 on Plan MH764 25 Lot 48 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 49 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 49 on Plan MH134 19 Lot 50 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 50 on Plan PG413 9 Lot 51 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 51 on Plan PG475 9 Lot 51 on Plan MH823 25 Lot 52 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 53 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 54 on Plan PG485 9 Lot 54 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 55 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 56 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 57 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 57 on Plan FTY609 6 Lot 58 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 59 on Plan G6771 18 Pt Lot 59 on Plan BLM216 34 Lot 59 on Plan FTY610 6 Lot 60 on Plan G6771 18 Lot 60 on Plan FTY776 6 Lot 65 on Plan MH811 19 Lot 75 on Plan FTY767 2 Lot 77 on Plan MH271 20 Pt Lot 79 on Plan FTY1967 13, 14, 15 Lot 80 on Plan MH627 16 Pt Lot 81 on Plan FTY1766 15 Lot 82 on Plan MH697 19 Lot 87 on Plan MH689 15 Lot 88 on Plan MH690 15 Lot 89 on Plan SP140808 16 Lot 95 on Plan MH881 15 Lot 96 on Plan MH170 28 Lot 103 on Plan DY900 13 Lot 108 on Plan DY1071 13 Lot 109 on Plan MH1 17 Lot 109 on Plan D36972 15 Lot 110 on Plan SP171826 16 Lot 114 on Plan MH219 20 Lot 127 on Plan FTY441 14 Lot 129 on Plan MH842553 23 Lot 131 on Plan NPW669 1 Lot 144 on Plan NPW682 6 Pt Lot 150 on Plan FTY1000 12 Lot 189 on Plan FTY1608 13 Lot 192 on Plan MH538 22 Lot 193 on Plan MH887 22 Lot 194 on Plan MH837 22 Lot 202 on Plan MH836 22 Lot 204 on Plan MH545 22 Lot 205 on Plan MH545 22 Lot 206 on Plan MH545 22 Lot 212 on Plan MH625 25 Lot 215 on Plan FTY440 14 Lot 219 on Plan FTY614 14 Pt Lot 220 on Plan FTY209 11 Lot 227 on Plan FTY1855 6 Lot 230 on Plan FTY1058 14 Lot 232 on Plan CLV3475 14 Pt Lot 232 on Plan FTY828 13 Lot 235 on Plan MH773 25 Lot 237 on Plan MH882 25 Lot 238 on Plan MH713 25 Lot 242 on Plan MH735 24 Lot 248 on Plan CP867508 24 Lot 252 on Plan MH836 22 Lot 261 on Plan CP899679 25 Lot 263 on Plan C819 23 Lot 264 on Plan SP272382 22 Pt Lot 267 on Plan NPW466 13 Lot 272 on Plan CLV3474 14 Lot 304 on Plan SP178709 25 Lot 306 on Plan MH889 25 Lot 310 on Plan MH883 23 Pt Lot 329 on Plan PH1750 13, 14 Pt Lot 341 on Plan FTY1881 14 Lot 2978 on Plan SP276272 14 Lot 3147 on Plan PH1511 14 Lot 37 on Plan SP116300 9 Lot 5324 on Plan PH1744 31 That part of Lot 24 on G472, excluding the areas bounded by the following approximate coordinates: Area 1 (Tennis Court) - Longitude Latitude (East) (South) 150.301767 -28.545092 150.301685 -28.545524 150.300818 -28.545395 150.300900 -28.544964 Area 2 (Swimming Pool) - Longitude Latitude (East) (South) 150.300819 -28.545378 150.301689 -28.545507 150.301589 -28.546032 150.300719 -28.545903 Area 3 (Restroom) - Longitude Latitude (East) (South) 150.302087 -28.546109 150.302135 -28.545861 150.302271 -28.545881 150.302223 -28.546129 Area 4 (Childcare Centre) - Longitude Latitude (East) (South) 150.302087 -28.546108 150.301951 -28.546088 150.301998 -28.545840 150.302134 -28.545861
Data Reference and source Cadastral data sourced from Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Qld (August 2016) Reference datum Geographical coordinates are referenced to the Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994 (GDA94), in decimal degrees. Prepared by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (7 September 2016). Part 3 -- External Boundary Description This application area covers all lands and waters within the external boundary described below: Commencing at the intersection of the New South Wales - Queensland Border and the southern boundary of the Macintyre Brook watershed, north westerly of the Township of Texas, and extending generally westerly along that State Border to Longitude 149.676692° East; then generally north westerly passing through the following coordinate points: Longitude (East) Latitude (South) 149.679790 28.613495 149.672157 28.593771 149.658073 28.571512 149.645099 28.547181 149.630502 28.527717 149.591578 28.462834 149.574186 28.447433 149.550646 28.425801 149.525591 28.393401 149.512571 28.367355 149.497507 28.347668 149.484534 28.311983 149.451184 28.289219 149.408392 28.292940 149.369320 28.309684 149.337690 28.320846 149.317890 28.339911 149.303153 28.343504 149.288138 28.351219 149.275658 28.359798 149.239664 28.379669 149.210342 28.389628 149.195129 28.389765 149.161310 28.367760 149.125580 28.349340 149.096890 28.330100 149.062700 28.310690 149.030880 28.292240 149.020890 28.285340 148.999470 28.272140 148.966770 28.247750 148.936050 28.226910
Then north westerly to a point approximately 38 kilometres southeast of the Township of St George at Longitude 148.919302° East and Latitude 28.204870° South; then generally north easterly passing through the following coordinate points: Longitude (East) Latitude (South) 148.951670 28.178710 148.992580 28.153330 149.049680 28.095820 149.075660 28.053030 149.119810 28.021940 149.135040 28.007850
Then north easterly to the centreline of Moonie River at Longitude 149.166497° East; then generally easterly and generally north easterly along the centreline of that river and the centreline of Teelba Creek to Latitude 27.794790° South; then generally north easterly and generally easterly passing though the following coordinate points: Longitude (East) Latitude (South) 149.411070 27.777196 149.605041 27.752949 149.848859 27.723215 150.123897 27.644421 150.234960 27.570935 150.286851 27.520291 150.403210 27.408453 150.481252 27.371987 150.534133 27.347660 150.607791 27.332272 150.666675 27.333492 150.752710 27.343340 150.793880 27.356010
Then easterly to the intersection of the line joining Longitude 150.793880° East, Latitude 27.356010° South and Longitude 150.835970° East, Latitude 27.368300° South with the south western boundary of the Condamine River watershed; then generally southerly, generally easterly and again generally southerly along that watershed to its intersection with the line joining Longitude 151.125600° East, Latitude 27.802770° South and Longitude 151.125600° East, Latitude 27.833340° South; then generally southerly passing through the following coordinate points: Longitude (East) Latitude (South) 151.125600 27.833340 151.124630 27.858290 151.121580 27.881990 151.120030 27.896420 151.118280 27.909150 151.110020 27.929610 151.098030 27.951260 151.092600 27.971170 151.081170 27.995050 151.068760 28.021590 151.061730 28.044510 151.053110 28.070420 151.040150 28.097860 151.036560 28.119890 151.030760 28.142410 151.026540 28.167350 151.021280 28.188960 151.017820 28.214980 151.016180 28.239980 151.013960 28.262750 151.012780 28.294560 151.017410 28.320720 151.022500 28.347980 151.028350 28.381740 151.033690 28.405540 151.040640 28.432070 151.045590 28.463620 151.053170 28.492650 151.063060 28.522060 151.073560 28.551110 151.088930 28.582880
Then south easterly to the intersection of the line joining Longitude 151.088930° East, Latitude 28.582880° South and Longitude 151.098730° East, Latitude 28.619720° South with the southern boundary of the Macintyre Brook watershed; then generally westerly along that watershed back to the commencement point. Note Data Reference and source Drainage basin sub-area data depicts a subdivision of the major drainage basins (catchment) in Queensland, Dataset sourced from Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Qld (20 Feb 2009). Cadastral data Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Qld (20 Feb 2009). Topographic vector data is © Commonwealth of Australia (Geoscience Australia) 2003. Reference datum Geographical coordinates have been provided by the NNTT Geospatial Services and are referenced to the Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994 (GDA94), in decimal degrees and are based on the spatial reference data acquired from the various custodians at the time. Use of Coordinates Where coordinates are used within the description to represent cadastral or topographical boundaries or the intersection with such, they are intended as a guide only. As an outcome to the custodians of cadastral and topographic data continuously recalculating the geographic position of their data based on improved survey and data maintenance procedures, it is not possible to accurately define such a position other than by detailed ground survey. Prepared by Geospatial Services, National Native Title Tribunal (25 May 2015) Map of Determination Area Schedule 2 -- AREAS NOT FORMING PART OF THE DETERMINATION AREA The following areas of land and waters are excluded from the Determination Area. Part 1 -- Excluded as Previous Exclusive Possession Acts
Data Reference and source Cadastral data sourced from Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Qld (August 2016) Reference datum Geographical coordinates are referenced to the Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994 (GDA94), in decimal degrees. Prepared by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines (7 September 2016) Schedule 3 -- NATIVE TITLE HOLDERS
REEVES J: 1 On 14 April 2009, Russell Doctor, Arthur Georgetown, Cheryl Moggs, Tony Turnbull, George Hopkins, Gary Woodbridge and Veronica Jarrett, acting as the authorised applicant of the Bigambul People, applied in accordance with the provisions of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) (the NTA) for a determination that native title exists over certain land and waters in the South Western Downs region of Queensland (the Bigambul application). 2 The claim area of the Bigambul application covers approximately 20,000 square kilometres. It encompasses country watered by the Weir River and its tributaries. Its southern limit is defined in part by the Macintyre River (which becomes the Barwon River at its junction with the Weir River) and a portion of the Dumaresq River. The Moonie River defines part of its western boundary. In the north, it extends to encompass Western Creek (a tributary of the Weir River) and in the east, Cecil Plains and Texas. Goondiwindi is the largest town in the claim area. 3 There were three earlier native title determination applications lodged or filed by the Bigambul People. The first of those was lodged with the National Native Title Tribunal on 22 September 1998. That application was dismissed on 18 August 2000. Two further applications were filed with this Court, one in 2001 and the other in 2008. Those applications were either dismissed or discontinued. The current application was initially accepted for registration on 4 June 2009 and remains on the Register of Native Title Claims. 4 The remaining respondents to the Bigambul application are: the Goondiwindi, Toowoomba and Western Downs Regional Councils; the Balonne Shire Council; Ergon Energy Corporation Limited; Telstra Corporation Limited; and various mining and pastoral entities. 5 On 18 October 2016, the Court made orders splitting the Bigambul application into Parts A and B. Bigambul Part A comprises the vast majority of the claim area. It is described in considerable detail in Schedule 1 of the orders I will make today. Bigambul Part B comprises six lots within the claim area in relation to which the Bigambul Applicant has disputed whether the grants over those lots of previous exclusive possession acts under s 23B of the NTA have resulted in the extinguishment of native title rights and interests with respect to them. That issue is awaiting the outcome of an appeal to the Full Court from my decision in Doyle on behalf of the Iman People #2 v State of Queensland [2016] FCA 13. 6 The parties have now informed the Court that they have reached agreement to resolve the Bigambul application in relation to all of the Bigambul Part A portion of the claim area. Accordingly, they have requested that the Court make a determination of native title under s 87A of the NTA in the terms of the agreement filed with the Court on 11 November 2016 (the s 87A agreement). Since this agreement relates to a part of the claim area covered by the application, I am satisfied that s 87A applies to it (see s 87A(1)(b)). 7 I have made orders by consent in a number of native title determination applications in recent times and on each occasion I have commented on the length of time it has taken to finally determine those applications (see, for example, Kearns on behalf of the Gunggari People #2 v State of Queensland [2012] FCA 651, Doyle on behalf of the Iman People #2 v State of Queensland [2016] FCA 743 and Congoo on behalf of the Bar Barrum People #2 v State of Queensland [2016] FCA 693). Some of those applications had been filed in the Court as long as 20 years ago. In those judgments, I made specific reference to the Court's grave concern regarding the length of time it is taking to finalise native title applications. The same concern arises with this matter. By comparison to the proceedings referred to above, the fact that this application was filed approximately 7½ years ago would make it relatively young. However, that ignores the fact that the first Bigambul application was lodged with the National Native Title Tribunal about 18½ years ago (see at [3] above). In that period, many of the knowledgeable Bigambul elders have undoubtedly passed away without seeing their native title recognised. To attempt to avoid this state of affairs and to attempt to reduce these sorts of delays occurring in its native title lists, in recent years, particularly since the 2009 amendments to the NTA and the introduction of Pt VB to the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), the Court has sought to make full use of its case management powers. 8 As is already mentioned above, in this matter, the power of the Court to give effect to the parties' agreement is founded on s 87A of the NTA. That section sets out the various conditions which will trigger the jurisdiction of the Court in the event that the parties reach agreement on the terms of an order to resolve a proceeding where the agreement relates to a part of the claim area (s 87A(1)(b)). The first condition is that the notice period under s 66 of the NTA must have ended prior to the parties' written agreement being filed with the Court (s 87A(1)(b)). The National Native Title Tribunal's notification of the Bigambul application was completed in 2009 and so that condition has been met. Secondly, the agreement of the parties must relate to an area (the determination area) which is included in the area covered by the application (s 87A(1)(b)). As I have already observed above, in this instance the agreement of the parties relates to Part A of the Bigambul application, which comprises the vast majority of the claim area, so that condition is also met. Thirdly, all of the parties described in s 87A(1)(c) must be parties to the agreement. The Commonwealth of Australia withdrew as a party in 2015. Aside from it, all the other parties there described are parties to the s 87A agreement. Fourthly, the terms of the agreement must be in writing and signed by or on behalf of those parties (s 87A(1)(d)). It is apparent from the s 87A agreement filed with the Court on 11 November 2016 that that condition has also been met. 9 Having satisfied those matters, the next condition is that the Court must be satisfied that an order in the terms of the order sought, or an order consistent with those terms, would be within the power of the Court (s 87A(4)(a)). An order will be within the power of the Court if it complies with s 94A of the NTA, if the rights and interests included in the proposed determinations are recognisable by the common law of Australia and if there is no other determination in existence over the area the subject of the proposed determinations. 10 Section 94A requires the Court, in making a determination, to set out the details of the matters mentioned in s 225 of the NTA. Section 225 outlines the content of a determination of native title as: A determination of native title is a determination whether or not native title exists in relation to a particular area (the determination area) of land and waters and, if it does exist, a determination of: (a) who the persons, or each group of persons, holding the common or group rights comprising the native title are; and (b) the nature and extent of the native title rights and interests in relation to the determination area; and (c) the nature and extent of any other interests in relation to the determination area; and (d) the relationship between the rights and interests in paragraphs (b) and (c) (taking into account the effect of this Act); and (e) to the extent that the land or waters in the determination area are not covered by a non-exclusive agricultural lease or a non-exclusive pastoral lease - whether the native title rights and interests confer possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of that land or waters on the native title holders to the exclusion of all others. (Emphasis in original; note omitted) 11 Having regard to the materials described below (at [15]-[23]) and having examined the draft consent determination attached to the s 87A agreement, I am satisfied that each of the matters outlined in s 94A is properly articulated therein. I am also satisfied that there is no other determination of native title in existence over any part of the determination area. Finally, I am satisfied that the native title rights and interests of the Bigambul People in the determination area are recognisable by the common law of Australia. 12 As to the remaining subsections of s 87A (with the exception of s 87A(4)(b): see below), in accordance with s 87A(3), on 14 November 2016, a Registrar of the Court gave notice to all remaining parties that the proposed determination had been filed with the Court. No objections were made by any of the other parties so the provisions of s 87A(8) do not arise for consideration in this instance. As well, none of the parties has elected to file an agreed statement of facts for the purposes of this proposed determination so I do not need to concern myself with ss 87A(9) to 87A(12) inclusive. 13 The final condition the parties need to meet in order to have the Court make a consent determination under s 87A of the NTA concerns the operation of s 87A(4)(b). That section requires the Court to be satisfied that it is appropriate to make a determination in terms of the parties' agreement. 14 In Nelson v Northern Territory of Australia (2010) 190 FCR 344; [2010] FCA 1343 (at [5]-[13]), I canvassed the authorities that identified the factors to which the Court will routinely have regard in determining this question of "appropriateness" under s 87. In my view, the same factors apply to s 87A. It is not necessary for me to repeat all those observations here, it will suffice to set out the concluding summary as follows (at [14]): It follows from all these considerations that the central issue in an application for a consent determination under s 87 is whether there exists a free and informed agreement between the parties. In this respect, the process followed by the State party respondent, particularly how it goes about assessing the underlying evidence as to the existence of native title is critical. Other critical factors, all directed to the processes that lead to the agreement and what was agreed, that have been previously identified by the Court include: whether the parties have independent and competent legal representation..; whether the terms of the proposed order are unambiguous and clear …; and whether the agreement has been preceded by a mediation process … 15 The s 87A agreement in this matter was reached after extensive mediation, case management and expert conferences. In that process, the following reports were commissioned and filed by the various parties at different stages: (a) Anthropological Expert Reports of Mr Michael Niblett - June 2003 and January 2008; (b) Bigambul Native Title Determination Application Report of Ms Karen L McFadden - December 2008; (c) Anthropology Reports prepared for Queensland South Native Title Services by Dr Anna Kenny - 27 June 2011 and 16 January 2015; (d) Anthropological Report of Mr Nathan Woolford - October 2012; (e) Expert Genealogical Report: Bigambul Research Area of Ms Kate Waters - 16 January 2015; (f) Expert Historical Report: Bigambul Research Area of Ms Kate Waters - 6 January 2015; (g) Supplementary Anthropology Report of Dr Fiona Powell - 23 February 2015; (h) Anthropological Assessment of the Expert and Lay Evidence Filed for the Bigambul Native Title Claim of Mr Daniel Leo - February 2015. 16 The Bigambul Applicant has filed detailed submissions in support of this proposed consent determination. Those submissions explain that this determination will recognise that native title is held by the descendants of the following people who are identified in the Genealogical Report of Ms Waters (see [15(e)] above): (a) Nellie Yumbeina; (b) Queen Susan of Welltown; (c) Jack Noble; (d) Sally Murray; (e) Susan (mother of Duncan Daniels); or (f) Jack and James Armstrong. 17 The submissions also refer to a number of affidavits provided by members of the Bigambul claim group: Ms Daphne Jarrett, Mr Cyril Logan, Ms Katherine Hippi, Mr Herbert Noble, Mr Leslie Woodbridge and Ms Jennifer Clevens. Those affidavits illustrate in detail the transmission of the stories that support the beliefs held by the Bigambul People as they relate to hunting of kangaroo, possum, turkey, goanna and bandicoot and the collection and preparation of bush tucker. For example, in his affidavit, Mr Herbert Noble refers to being taught to hunt and fish by his father and uncles to provide food. He has said that porcupine was his favourite meal and was cooked in fire pits. All of the deponents speak of learning about the observance of their traditional laws and customs and the kinship of the claim group from grandparents and parents. 18 This direct evidence from the Bigambul claimants in relation to the exercise of their native title rights and interests is supplemented by the extensive anthropological material outlined above. For example, in her Report dated 27 June 2011, Dr Kenny (see at [15(c)] above) examines the laws and customs that give rise to the rights and interests in land which she says derive from a broader regional society that includes a number of individual groups holding tenurial rights to particular stretches of country in southern Queensland and northern New South Wales. In that Report, Dr Kenny says: 277 The Bigambul and their neighbours such as the Kamilaroi, Yuwaalaraay and Mandandanji as well as other groups such as the Kooma acknowledge and observe the same body of laws and customs relating to rights and interests in land and waters. They and others constitute the society that acknowledges a common system of laws and customs in relation to the acquisition and possession of rights and interests in land. 278 Therefore, the common body of laws and customs that determined and determines the ownership of country was and is adhered to on both 'local' and regional level by the claimants and the other groups of their regional society. The rights and interests held in a country were endorsed within and amongst the relevant groups of the regional society who acknowledged and observed the same system of laws and customs in relation to land and waters. 19 European settlement of the claim area commenced when Mr Allan Cunningham led the first expedition into the Darling Downs in 1827. Dr Powell's report refers to records which show that land was first taken up along the Macintyre River in the late 1830s and, by the second half of the 1840s, pastoral stations were: [e]stablished along the frontages on both sides of the Macintyre River with the lower Weir River frontages taken up soon after. The pastoral occupation of the lower Moonie frontages was slower. The late 1840s saw pastoralists moving up the lower Moonie and downstream from the headwaters, but it was not until the second half of the 1850s that the whole of the frontages had been taken up (Waters 2015a:18). 20 The establishment of the pastoral industry allowed many Bigambul People to maintain their connection to their country and family. Dr Kenny, at paragraph 465 of her 27 June 2011 Report, says that: Aboriginal men were employed as stockmen, drovers, stickpickers, woodcutters, ringbarkers, fencers and station hands. Aboriginal women were mainly employed as domestic servants and cooks. Bigambul people appear to have lived and worked on stations for generations, which facilitated the intergenerational transmission of some traditional skills and knowledge about country. Thus, station work allowed Aboriginal people to remain on or close to their country and to maintain local and ecological knowledge. 21 And further (at paragraph 494): The management and dissemination of traditional knowledge, including appropriate social conduct, occurred through work and residence on pastoral properties and in the tightly knit fringe camps or reserves at or near such places as Boggabilla, Goondiwindi, Toobeah, Bungunya, and Mungundi. 22 The Bigambul Applicant relies on all this evidence to demonstrate the continued acknowledgement and observance of a range of Bigambul laws and customs with respect to cultural knowledge, spiritual beliefs, sites, decision making and resource use to support exclusive native title rights over that part of the determination area which is described in Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the proposed orders (other than in relation to the use and enjoyment of water) and the non-exclusive native title rights (other than in relation to the use and enjoyment of water) over the determination area, which is described in Part 2 of Schedule 1 of the proposed orders. 23 Having regard to the evidence summarised above, the submissions of the Bigambul Applicant, the fact that all the parties have had the advantage of competent legal representation and the fact I have already mentioned above, that the proposed consent determination was preceded by an intense process of mediation, case management and expert conferences, I am satisfied that the parties have reached a free and informed agreement to seek a consent determination of the Bigambul native title rights and interests in the claim area. Finally, I am also satisfied that the terms of the proposed orders are unambiguous and clear. I am therefore satisfied it is appropriate to make orders in the terms of the draft determination attached to the s 87A agreement. 24 Pursuant to s 56(2) of the NTA, the Bigambul Applicant has nominated the Bigambul Native Title Aboriginal Corporation ICN 8479 (the Corporation) to be the prescribed body corporate to hold the native title of the claimant group in trust following the making of this determination. The Corporation was registered on 20 September 2016. That nomination is in writing and the Corporation has given its consent to it. I am therefore satisfied that the relevant requirements of the NTA and of the Native Title (Prescribed Bodies Corporate) Regulations 1999 (Cth) have been met. 25 For these reasons, I am satisfied that the Bigambul Applicant and the other parties have met all the conditions set out in s 87A of the NTA to allow me to make the determination of native title that they have sought in the s 87A agreement. I will therefore proceed to make orders consistent with the determination proposed by the parties in that agreement. 26 The achievement of a settlement of a native title claim by agreement is to be encouraged and the work and commitment of all those involved to be commended. In particular, it is worth mentioning that this agreement could not have been achieved without the cooperation and goodwill of all the parties, the guidance provided to them by their legal, anthropological and other advisers and the assistance provided by the Court's Native Title Registrars and staff. Finally, I would make this concluding observation. The orders that I will now make determine, under the laws of Australia, that native title exists in the determination area according to the traditional laws and customs of the Bigambul People. It is, however, important to record that this determination, made as it is under the NTA, does not grant native title to the Bigambul People. Instead, it recognises, under the laws of Australia, the native title the Bigambul People have long held in the determination area under their traditional laws and customs. I certify that the preceding twenty-six (26) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Reeves.
SCHEDULE OF PARTIES QUD 101 of 2009 Respondents Second Respondent BALONNE SHIRE COUNCIL Third Respondent GOONDIWINDI REGIONAL COUNCIL Fourth Respondent: TOOWOOMBA REGIONAL COUNCIL Fifth Respondent: WESTERN DOWNS REGIONAL COUNCIL Sixth Respondent: ERGON ENERGY CORPORATION LIMITED Seventh Respondent: TELSTRA CORPORATION LIMITED Eighth Respondent: ANVIL AUSTRALIAN PETROLEUM PTY LTD Ninth Respondent: AUSTRALIA PACIFIC LNG PTY LIMITED Tenth Respondent: BRIDGEFIELD PTY LIMITED Eleventh Respondent: DELHI PETROLEUM PTY LTD Twelfth Respondent: MAUREEN JEAN HOPE Thirteenth Respondent: ROBERT BRUCE HOPE Fourteenth Respondent: MOONIE PIPELINE COMPANY PTY LTD Fifteenth Respondent: ORIGIN ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED Sixteenth Respondent: SANTOS AUSTRALIA HYDROCARBONS PTY LTD Seventeenth Respondent: SANTOS LIMITED Eighteenth Respondent: SANTOS QNT PTY LTD Nineteenth Respondent: SANTOS RESOURCES PTY LTD Twentieth Respondent: VAMGAS PTY LTD Twenty-First Respondent: SCOTT THOMAS BARKLA Twenty-Second Respondent: JUDITH MAHONEY FELTON-TAYLOR Twenty-Third Respondent: KIM FELTON-TAYLOR Twenty-Fourth Respondent: SCOTT KENNETH GLASSER Twenty-Fifth Respondent: JENNIFER SHIRLEY HUNT Twenty-Sixth Respondent: ELIZABETH REID MORRIS Twenty-Seventh Respondent: ROBERT HAROLD MORRIS Twenty-Eighth Respondent: THE TRUST COMPANY LIMITED
Doctor on behalf of the Bigambul People
State of Queensland