Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Green Pacific Energy Ltd
[2024] NSWSC 430
At a glance
Source factsCourt
Supreme Court of NSW
Decision date
2024-04-15
Before
McGrath J, Greenwood J
Catchwords
- [2006] FCA 1254 Carter v New Tel Limited (2003) 44 ACSR 661
- [2003] NSWSC 128 Fexuto Pty Ltd v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Ltd (2001) 37 ACSR 672
Source
Original judgment source is linked above.
Catchwords
Judgment (6 paragraphs)
INTRODUCTION
- This is a paradigm case of the irretrievable breakdown in sibling relations, having their consequences in corporation dissolutions. Thankfully, at least the siblings in these proceedings have been able to agree on that.
- The plaintiffs are Brenton Bullen and Sonja Trask. As there are multiple parties involved who have the same surname, I will refer to each person by their first name to avoid confusion but without intending any disrespect or over-familiarity.
- The other two siblings are Earl Mark Wesley Bullen and Craig Bullen.
- Brenton, Sonja, Mark and Craig are the children of Stafford Bullen and Ida Cleo Bullen.
- The Bullen family were involved in the business of wildlife safari parks from the 1960s onwards. They had a degree of notoriety.
- The operations and landholdings of the Bullen family ultimately resided in three corporate entities which are the subject of the present proceedings, being Earl Courtenay Pty Ltd (first defendant), Droffats Pty Ltd (third defendant) and Fenema Pty Ltd (fourth defendant). The second defendant is Mark.
- Brenton, Sonja, Mark and Craig have now all agreed that each of Earl Courtenay, Droffats and Fenema should be the subject of a winding up order on the just and equitable ground pursuant to s 461(1)(k) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
- I will evaluate the factual matrix to form my own views as to whether there is a sufficient reason for making the order to wind up each of Earl Courtenay, Droffats and Fenema: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Green Pacific Energy Ltd (2006) 59 ACSR 142; [2006] FCA 1254, Greenwood J at [139] (although I note that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission is not the moving party in the present application so there is no requirement that I do so in the public interest).