QLDIn ForceAct
Youth Justice Act 1992
sec.56Custody of child if not released by court
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.56
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Youth Justice Act 1992.
### sec.56 Custody of child if not released by court
This section applies if—
a court remands a child in custody; and
the child does not remain the prisoner of the court; and
the child is not already in the custody of the chief executive.
The commissioner of the police service must—
take immediate custody of the child; and
deliver the child into the custody of the chief executive as soon as reasonably practicable after the date the chief executive notifies to the commissioner under subsection (3) .
However, subsection (2) (b) stops applying if a child is in custody in a watch-house and the child turns 18 years. See section 276A .
The chief executive must—
notify the commissioner of the police service of the date from which delivery of the child into the chief executive’s custody will be accepted; and
fulfil the duty under paragraph (a) as soon as reasonably practicable in all the circumstances, including, for example, the number of children held by the commissioner and the capacity of detention centres.
In deciding the date, the chief executive must have regard to the information available to the chief executive about the following matters—
the child’s needs, having regard to—
the child’s age and sex; and
the child’s cultural background; and
the child’s historic and current self-harm risk and suicide risk; and
the child’s medical conditions, if any; and
the child’s physical health and mental health issues, if any; and
the child’s substance misuse and withdrawal issues, if any; and
the child’s cognitive capacity; and
the location and date of the child’s next court appearance; and
any other issue the chief executive considers may affect the child’s health or wellbeing in a watch-house environment; and
any other issue the chief executive considers may affect the child’s health or wellbeing while the child is being transported between a watch-house and a detention centre;
if 1 or more other children are being held by the commissioner of the police service—the relative needs of the child and the other children having regard to the matters mentioned in paragraph (a) ;
the effect the delivery of the child is likely to have on—
the chief executive’s ability to comply with section 263 ; and
the chief executive’s ability to fulfil the chief executive’s duties as an employer; and
the commissioner of the police service’s ability to fulfil the commissioner’s duties as an employer; and
the commissioner of the police service’s ability to fulfil the commissioner’s responsibility for—
the security and management of watch-houses; and
the safety and wellbeing of people detained in watch-houses.
A failure of the chief executive to provide procedural fairness to the child in deciding the date under subsection (4) does not affect the validity of the decision.
However, in deciding the date, the chief executive must not have regard to the effect of section 276A .
Subsection (2) does not apply to a person who is an adult being dealt with for an offence committed by the person as a child if, under section 135 , the person must be held in a corrective services facility.
Subsection (8) applies to jurisdiction conferred by an Act on a court—
to commit a person to a place of detention (other than a detention centre) pending appearance before a court; and
to give directions to the person in charge of the place.
The jurisdiction is taken, if the person is a child and this section applies, instead to confer jurisdiction on the court to remand the child into the custody of the chief executive and to give directions to the chief executive.
If a court remands a child into the custody of the chief executive under subsection (8) , subsection (2) applies to the child.
Subject to subsection (11) , the chief executive may keep a child mentioned in subsection (1) who is in the chief executive’s custody in places that the chief executive determines from time to time.
The chief executive can not determine under subsection (10) that a child is to be kept in a prison.
For the purposes of the Human Rights Act 2019 , section 43 (1) , it is declared that this section has effect—
despite being incompatible with human rights; and
despite anything else in the Human Rights Act 2019 .
This subsection and subsections (12) and (14) expire on 31 December 2026.
A regulation may postpone the expiry of this subsection and subsections (12) and (13) but can not postpone the expiry for more than 1 year after 31 December 2026.
s 56 amd 1996 No. 22 ss 19 , 3 sch 1 ; 1998 No. 39 s 26 ; 2002 No. 39 s 18 ; 2019 No. 38 s 84
sub 2023 No. 21 s 70
amd 2024 No. 54 s 12
(12)–(14) exp 31 December 2026 (see s 56(13))
(sec.56-ssec.1) This section applies if— a court remands a child in custody; and the child does not remain the prisoner of the court; and the child is not already in the custody of the chief executive.
(sec.56-ssec.2) The commissioner of the police service must— take immediate custody of the child; and deliver the child into the custody of the chief executive as soon as reasonably practicable after the date the chief executive notifies to the commissioner under subsection (3) . However, subsection (2) (b) stops applying if a child is in custody in a watch-house and the child turns 18 years. See section 276A .
(sec.56-ssec.3) The chief executive must— notify the commissioner of the police service of the date from which delivery of the child into the chief executive’s custody will be accepted; and fulfil the duty under paragraph (a) as soon as reasonably practicable in all the circumstances, including, for example, the number of children held by the commissioner and the capacity of detention centres.
(sec.56-ssec.4) In deciding the date, the chief executive must have regard to the information available to the chief executive about the following matters— the child’s needs, having regard to— the child’s age and sex; and the child’s cultural background; and the child’s historic and current self-harm risk and suicide risk; and the child’s medical conditions, if any; and the child’s physical health and mental health issues, if any; and the child’s substance misuse and withdrawal issues, if any; and the child’s cognitive capacity; and the location and date of the child’s next court appearance; and any other issue the chief executive considers may affect the child’s health or wellbeing in a watch-house environment; and any other issue the chief executive considers may affect the child’s health or wellbeing while the child is being transported between a watch-house and a detention centre; if 1 or more other children are being held by the commissioner of the police service—the relative needs of the child and the other children having regard to the matters mentioned in paragraph (a) ; the effect the delivery of the child is likely to have on— the chief executive’s ability to comply with section 263 ; and the chief executive’s ability to fulfil the chief executive’s duties as an employer; and the commissioner of the police service’s ability to fulfil the commissioner’s duties as an employer; and the commissioner of the police service’s ability to fulfil the commissioner’s responsibility for— the security and management of watch-houses; and the safety and wellbeing of people detained in watch-houses.
(sec.56-ssec.5) A failure of the chief executive to provide procedural fairness to the child in deciding the date under subsection (4) does not affect the validity of the decision.
(sec.56-ssec.4A) However, in deciding the date, the chief executive must not have regard to the effect of section 276A .
(sec.56-ssec.6) Subsection (2) does not apply to a person who is an adult being dealt with for an offence committed by the person as a child if, under section 135 , the person must be held in a corrective services facility.
(sec.56-ssec.7) Subsection (8) applies to jurisdiction conferred by an Act on a court— to commit a person to a place of detention (other than a detention centre) pending appearance before a court; and to give directions to the person in charge of the place.
(sec.56-ssec.8) The jurisdiction is taken, if the person is a child and this section applies, instead to confer jurisdiction on the court to remand the child into the custody of the chief executive and to give directions to the chief executive.
(sec.56-ssec.9) If a court remands a child into the custody of the chief executive under subsection (8) , subsection (2) applies to the child.
(sec.56-ssec.10) Subject to subsection (11) , the chief executive may keep a child mentioned in subsection (1) who is in the chief executive’s custody in places that the chief executive determines from time to time.
(sec.56-ssec.11) The chief executive can not determine under subsection (10) that a child is to be kept in a prison.
(sec.56-ssec.12) For the purposes of the Human Rights Act 2019 , section 43 (1) , it is declared that this section has effect— despite being incompatible with human rights; and despite anything else in the Human Rights Act 2019 .
(sec.56-ssec.13) This subsection and subsections (12) and (14) expire on 31 December 2026.
(sec.56-ssec.14) A regulation may postpone the expiry of this subsection and subsections (12) and (13) but can not postpone the expiry for more than 1 year after 31 December 2026.
- (a) a court remands a child in custody; and
- (b) the child does not remain the prisoner of the court; and
- (c) the child is not already in the custody of the chief executive.
- (a) take immediate custody of the child; and
- (b) deliver the child into the custody of the chief executive as soon as reasonably practicable after the date the chief executive notifies to the commissioner under subsection (3) .
- (a) notify the commissioner of the police service of the date from which delivery of the child into the chief executive’s custody will be accepted; and
- (b) fulfil the duty under paragraph (a) as soon as reasonably practicable in all the circumstances, including, for example, the number of children held by the commissioner and the capacity of detention centres.
- (a) the child’s needs, having regard to— (i) the child’s age and sex; and (ii) the child’s cultural background; and (iii) the child’s historic and current self-harm risk and suicide risk; and (iv) the child’s medical conditions, if any; and (v) the child’s physical health and mental health issues, if any; and (vi) the child’s substance misuse and withdrawal issues, if any; and (vii) the child’s cognitive capacity; and (viii) the location and date of the child’s next court appearance; and (ix) any other issue the chief executive considers may affect the child’s health or wellbeing in a watch-house environment; and (x) any other issue the chief executive considers may affect the child’s health or wellbeing while the child is being transported between a watch-house and a detention centre;
- (i) the child’s age and sex; and
- (ii) the child’s cultural background; and
- (iii) the child’s historic and current self-harm risk and suicide risk; and
- (iv) the child’s medical conditions, if any; and
- (v) the child’s physical health and mental health issues, if any; and
- (vi) the child’s substance misuse and withdrawal issues, if any; and
- (vii) the child’s cognitive capacity; and
- (viii) the location and date of the child’s next court appearance; and
- (ix) any other issue the chief executive considers may affect the child’s health or wellbeing in a watch-house environment; and
- (x) any other issue the chief executive considers may affect the child’s health or wellbeing while the child is being transported between a watch-house and a detention centre;
- (b) if 1 or more other children are being held by the commissioner of the police service—the relative needs of the child and the other children having regard to the matters mentioned in paragraph (a) ;
- (c) the effect the delivery of the child is likely to have on— (i) the chief executive’s ability to comply with section 263 ; and (ii) the chief executive’s ability to fulfil the chief executive’s duties as an employer; and (iii) the commissioner of the police service’s ability to fulfil the commissioner’s duties as an employer; and (iv) the commissioner of the police service’s ability to fulfil the commissioner’s responsibility for— (A) the security and management of watch-houses; and (B) the safety and wellbeing of people detained in watch-houses.
- (i) the chief executive’s ability to comply with section 263 ; and
- (ii) the chief executive’s ability to fulfil the chief executive’s duties as an employer; and
- (iii) the commissioner of the police service’s ability to fulfil the commissioner’s duties as an employer; and
- (iv) the commissioner of the police service’s ability to fulfil the commissioner’s responsibility for— (A) the security and management of watch-houses; and (B) the safety and wellbeing of people detained in watch-houses.
- (A) the security and management of watch-houses; and
- (B) the safety and wellbeing of people detained in watch-houses.
- (i) the child’s age and sex; and
- (ii) the child’s cultural background; and
- (iii) the child’s historic and current self-harm risk and suicide risk; and
- (iv) the child’s medical conditions, if any; and
- (v) the child’s physical health and mental health issues, if any; and
- (vi) the child’s substance misuse and withdrawal issues, if any; and
- (vii) the child’s cognitive capacity; and
- (viii) the location and date of the child’s next court appearance; and
- (ix) any other issue the chief executive considers may affect the child’s health or wellbeing in a watch-house environment; and
- (x) any other issue the chief executive considers may affect the child’s health or wellbeing while the child is being transported between a watch-house and a detention centre;
- (i) the chief executive’s ability to comply with section 263 ; and
- (ii) the chief executive’s ability to fulfil the chief executive’s duties as an employer; and
- (iii) the commissioner of the police service’s ability to fulfil the commissioner’s duties as an employer; and
- (iv) the commissioner of the police service’s ability to fulfil the commissioner’s responsibility for— (A) the security and management of watch-houses; and (B) the safety and wellbeing of people detained in watch-houses.
- (A) the security and management of watch-houses; and
- (B) the safety and wellbeing of people detained in watch-houses.
- (A) the security and management of watch-houses; and
- (B) the safety and wellbeing of people detained in watch-houses.
- (a) to commit a person to a place of detention (other than a detention centre) pending appearance before a court; and
- (b) to give directions to the person in charge of the place.
- (a) despite being incompatible with human rights; and
- (b) despite anything else in the Human Rights Act 2019 .