sec.91UGrounds for discretionary extension of prescribed period

### sec.91U Grounds for discretionary extension of prescribed period It is a ground for extending an interlock driver’s prescribed period if— the person drove a nominated vehicle for the person without first providing the vehicle’s prescribed interlock with a specimen of the person’s breath; or The person drove a nominated vehicle for the person immediately after another person provided the vehicle’s prescribed interlock with the specimen of breath that enabled the vehicle to start. the person drove a nominated vehicle for the person when the person knew, or ought reasonably to have known, the vehicle’s prescribed interlock was not operating properly; or the person drove a nominated vehicle for the person when the person knew, or ought reasonably to have known that the vehicle’s prescribed interlock had been interfered with. In this section— interfered with includes tampered with, damaged, destroyed and removed. s 91U ins 2010 No. 13 s 17 amd 2019 No. 25 s 98 (sec.91U-ssec.1) It is a ground for extending an interlock driver’s prescribed period if— the person drove a nominated vehicle for the person without first providing the vehicle’s prescribed interlock with a specimen of the person’s breath; or The person drove a nominated vehicle for the person immediately after another person provided the vehicle’s prescribed interlock with the specimen of breath that enabled the vehicle to start. the person drove a nominated vehicle for the person when the person knew, or ought reasonably to have known, the vehicle’s prescribed interlock was not operating properly; or the person drove a nominated vehicle for the person when the person knew, or ought reasonably to have known that the vehicle’s prescribed interlock had been interfered with. (sec.91U-ssec.2) In this section— interfered with includes tampered with, damaged, destroyed and removed. - (a) the person drove a nominated vehicle for the person without first providing the vehicle’s prescribed interlock with a specimen of the person’s breath; or Example— The person drove a nominated vehicle for the person immediately after another person provided the vehicle’s prescribed interlock with the specimen of breath that enabled the vehicle to start. - (b) the person drove a nominated vehicle for the person when the person knew, or ought reasonably to have known, the vehicle’s prescribed interlock was not operating properly; or - (c) the person drove a nominated vehicle for the person when the person knew, or ought reasonably to have known that the vehicle’s prescribed interlock had been interfered with.