QLDIn ForceRegulation
Supreme Court (Admission) Rules 2004
sec.24Appeal from registrar’s decision under mutual recognition legislation
Start here
Get a plain-English read of sec.24
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Supreme Court (Admission) Rules 2004.
### sec.24 Appeal from registrar’s decision under mutual recognition legislation
A decision of the registrar in relation to the admission of a person under a mutual recognition Act as a lawyer in Queensland is not subject to appeal or review by the court or the Court of Appeal.
Under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992 (Cwlth) , section 34 and the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Act 1997 (Cwlth) , section 33 , a person may apply for the review of a decision of a local registration authority in relation to its functions under that Act.
Subrule (1) applies despite the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 , rules 791 and 792 .
In this rule—
mutual recognition Act means—
the Mutual Recognition Act 1992 (Cwlth) ; or
the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Act 1997 (Cwlth) .
r 24 amd 2007 SL No. 155 s 20 ; 2015 SL No. 124 s 19 (3)
(sec.24-ssec.1) A decision of the registrar in relation to the admission of a person under a mutual recognition Act as a lawyer in Queensland is not subject to appeal or review by the court or the Court of Appeal. Under the Mutual Recognition Act 1992 (Cwlth) , section 34 and the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Act 1997 (Cwlth) , section 33 , a person may apply for the review of a decision of a local registration authority in relation to its functions under that Act.
(sec.24-ssec.2) Subrule (1) applies despite the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 , rules 791 and 792 .
(sec.24-ssec.3) In this rule— mutual recognition Act means— the Mutual Recognition Act 1992 (Cwlth) ; or the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Act 1997 (Cwlth) .
- (a) the Mutual Recognition Act 1992 (Cwlth) ; or
- (b) the Trans-Tasman Mutual Recognition Act 1997 (Cwlth) .