ACTIn ForceAct
Supreme Court Act 1933
37LAppeal judge unable to continue sitting
Start here
Get a plain-English read of 37L
Turn the raw legal text into a practical explanation grounded in Supreme Court Act 1933.
37L Appeal judge unable to continue sitting
(1) If, before a proceeding on an appeal is decided, 1 of the judges
becomes unable to continue to sit on the appeal, the proceedings may
continue before the appeal court constituted by the 2 remaining
judges, if the parties agree.
Note If a judge’s term of office ends before the proceeding is decided, this
section does not apply (unless the judge is removed from office, or is
otherwise unable to continue to sit on the appeal). Section 60A provides
that, in this circumstance, the judge continues to hold office for the
purpose of the proceeding, and may continue to exercise the jurisdiction
of the Court of Appeal for that purpose.
(2) If the parties do not agree to the continuation of the proceeding before
the 2 remaining judges, the appeal must be reheard and decided by
the Court of Appeal constituted by 3 judges ((including, if
practicable, the 2 remaining judges)).
(3) If the parties agree to the continuation of proceedings before the
2 remaining judges, and the remaining judges are divided in
opinion—
(a) if they are divided in opinion about the decision on the appeal—
the appeal must be reheard and decided by the Court of Appeal
constituted by 3 judges (including, if practicable, the
2 remaining judges); or
(b) if they are divided in opinion about any other issue—the
decision of the court is the decision of the most senior of the
remaining judges.