sec.35HCriteria for evaluating proposed change

### sec.35H Criteria for evaluating proposed change In making the evaluation, the Coordinator-General must consider each of the following— the nature of the proposed change and its effects on the project; the project as currently evaluated under the Coordinator-General’s report for the EIS or IAR for the project; the environmental effects of the proposed change and its effects on the project; if, under section 35G , public notification was required—all properly made submissions about the proposed change and its effects on the project; if the change relates to a project for which an EIS was required—the material mentioned in section 34A (1) (a) to the extent the Coordinator-General considers it is relevant to the proposed change and its effects on the project; if the change relates to a project for which an IAR was required—the material mentioned in section 34I (1) (a) to the extent the Coordinator-General considers it is relevant to the proposed change and its effects on the project. s 35H ins 2005 No. 57 s 28 amd 2014 No. 40 s 42 - (a) the nature of the proposed change and its effects on the project; - (b) the project as currently evaluated under the Coordinator-General’s report for the EIS or IAR for the project; - (c) the environmental effects of the proposed change and its effects on the project; - (d) if, under section 35G , public notification was required—all properly made submissions about the proposed change and its effects on the project; - (e) if the change relates to a project for which an EIS was required—the material mentioned in section 34A (1) (a) to the extent the Coordinator-General considers it is relevant to the proposed change and its effects on the project; - (f) if the change relates to a project for which an IAR was required—the material mentioned in section 34I (1) (a) to the extent the Coordinator-General considers it is relevant to the proposed change and its effects on the project.