sec.200Continuation of inconsistent activity under existing permission

### sec.200 Continuation of inconsistent activity under existing permission This section applies if— before the commencement, a person was authorised under an existing permission to enter or use a part of the former marine park to conduct an activity; and from the commencement, the granting of a permission to conduct the activity in the corresponding part of the new marine park would be inconsistent with the new plan. From the commencement, the person continues to be authorised under the existing permission to enter or use the part of the former marine park to conduct the activity as if— the Marine Parks (Declaration) Regulation 2006 , schedule 3, as in force immediately before the commencement, had not been repealed; and the repealed plan had not been repealed and the new plan had not been approved. This section stops applying at the end of 120 days after the commencement. s 200 ins 2024 SL No. 25 s 39 (sec.200-ssec.1) This section applies if— before the commencement, a person was authorised under an existing permission to enter or use a part of the former marine park to conduct an activity; and from the commencement, the granting of a permission to conduct the activity in the corresponding part of the new marine park would be inconsistent with the new plan. (sec.200-ssec.2) From the commencement, the person continues to be authorised under the existing permission to enter or use the part of the former marine park to conduct the activity as if— the Marine Parks (Declaration) Regulation 2006 , schedule 3, as in force immediately before the commencement, had not been repealed; and the repealed plan had not been repealed and the new plan had not been approved. (sec.200-ssec.3) This section stops applying at the end of 120 days after the commencement. - (a) before the commencement, a person was authorised under an existing permission to enter or use a part of the former marine park to conduct an activity; and - (b) from the commencement, the granting of a permission to conduct the activity in the corresponding part of the new marine park would be inconsistent with the new plan. - (a) the Marine Parks (Declaration) Regulation 2006 , schedule 3, as in force immediately before the commencement, had not been repealed; and - (b) the repealed plan had not been repealed and the new plan had not been approved.